Ask HN: Will you hope S3 become a real file system?
1) eventual consistency, do not known whether it's consistent or not, could result in wrong answer for analytics.
2) lacking of cheap/atomic rename, also symlink, it's painful to manage huge amount of data.
EFS is great, but can only be accessed from same VPC, also too expensive. Setuping up a DFS (GlusterFS/Ceph/MooseFS) in the cloud is also expensive and hard to manage.
ObjectiveFS looks great, after tried out, it still kind of eventual consistent from distributed system's point view(other nodes can't see the updates immediately). A distributed version of S3QL will be great.
Are you also hoping to have a solution that's as easy and scalable as S3, but also provide the same ACID guarantee as file system? If you know a solution like that, please leave a comment, thanks!
6 comments
[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 23.5 ms ] threadFlat fee offerings will be an enabler, not the technological advancement.
If the $ per byte of storage is relatively small comparing to the cost of S3, I actually like that model, pay as you go.
"AWS S3 and Google GCS charges are not included."
It only seems to be flat fee if you store your data on your own server and even then, I would quote 'flat fee', as your costs will go up when you add storage. You also take responsibility for backing up the data.
It's on-server-encrypted, version controlled, supports all platforms including Linux and also flat fee-ed.
I personally use Delimiter's Obj.Space service. I bought a 2tb bundle, with 20tb of monthly bandwidth, for 3 years. It was a one-time fee of $100.
I know OVH has some attractive offers too.
https://www.delimiter.com/objspace-object-storage/ https://www.ovh.com/us/cloud/storage/object-storage.xml