I'm trying to wrap my head around how backward this guy's reasoning is. He wants the "new atheists" to provide him with a compelling logical argument that his god does not exist. It seems like an oddly backward supposition of where the burden of proof lies in this argument.
4 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 22.0 ms ] threadthis is him: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bentley_Hart
Also, atheism == disco.