Apparently Google doesn't want people to waste money on ineffective commercials.
This actually is a good fit with Google's advertising policy elsewhere. The idea being that the more useful ads are to users, the more likely it is that users are willing to pay attention to them.
I'm wondering what's the point of the guitar and hoopla? If they are trying to promote CouchDB, I would hope (dear God, I would hope) developers would choose databases based on technical merits and not image. I think image-based advertising would go better for soft drinks and such. Are they trying to go viral by hitting the delicate sweet spot of so-bad-its-good?
10 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 40.1 ms ] threadYeah, the audio was kinda poor.
This actually is a good fit with Google's advertising policy elsewhere. The idea being that the more useful ads are to users, the more likely it is that users are willing to pay attention to them.
But I suggest you take the feedback from Google and others and use that to inform the next iteration. It can only get better! ;)