Ask HN: Every website wants to send me notifications

I've never clicked allow. I don't turn on notifications for phone apps either though.

I actually like this feature. It's more useful on sites that don't update as frequently or have more obscure content. However, I really dislike notifications from the mainstream websites because I was going to visit them during the day anyway.

If I want notifications from a website I add its RSS feed to my reader.

I'm surprised you are seeing this with "most" sites - I barely ever see it, but I agree that it's infuriating when I do.

I don't think this trend will last, though. If a user denies the notification request then the site is never allowed to ask again - the user has to manually enable the permission. People are going to learn quite quickly that if you don't put the request in the context of a specific action you're screwing yourself over.

That said, I wouldn't mind it if these prompts could only be shown in response to click events. Small downside, but it would stop the request spam quite effectively.

I don't think it is ruining the experience because it's easy to not allow them, my question is: how is it that so many people are clicking allow that businesses see it worth the annoyance to add this to their site. That's what baffles me.

Example: Never miss a great news story! Get instant notifications from Economic Times http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/finance/gov...

This news site is showing a custom popup to ask for permission and blocking the content.

That's what RSS is for, no? Keeps the subscription under your control, you don't have to share anything with anyone, you can unsubscribe easily and it's trivial to anonymize through a reader that caches/proxies the requests.

Perfect for the end user. Not so perfect for the spam industry, of course, but whenever those guys get to decide how something on the internet should work it always turns ugly, so that really has to stop.

   dom.webnotifications.serviceworker.enabled
   dom.webnotifications.enabled

And every blog (and not only blog) asks me to subscribe to their newsletter before i even read the article.

Are these things so effective that everyone uses them?

I run Slack in it's own Chrome Window via the Add to Desktop Feature in the Chrome options menu. With Notifications Enabled it is a viable replacement to the desktop app.

Slack's Desktop app is built on Electron, so it's a second installation of Chrome anyways.

Maybe reverse the behavior. Instead of asking, make it a standard feature in UI:

Alt-N => browser pop under:

[offers notifications][show all][show some]

Or maybe just some icon in the url bar ?

My main annoyance is that I'm not sure what they're asking for?

What kind of notification? How does it work? When/where will I be notified? How would I turn it off?

Has anyone got lucky and had a site do all of the following on the same page?

• Ask to send notifications,

• Ask to use your location,

• Say something about you not having the SharePoint plugin or asking permission to use it or something like that?

Chrome lets you disable that request: Preferences->Show advanced settings->Content Settings (under 'Privacy')->Notifications

Select "Do not allow any site to show notifications"

Myself, I find this just as bad as the constant overlays asking for you to sign up to a mailing list. I use the 'Behind the Overlay' extension to kill those, but I'd like something that prevented them appearing in the first place.

Increased engagement from the users who stay is more visible than the attrition of the users who don't return because of notification overload.

There's a 'silent majority' effect when you measure the impact of a feature that increases engagement.

Imagine a feature causes 50% of users to immediately read another article and the other 50% to never return. That may look like a win after 2 weeks of testing, but the long-term effects on your business can be iffy.

Subscription popups/overlays are the anti christ

I hate those in news sites, but I did find them useful for a couple of websites—mainly where I was waiting for a reply for an auction or booking request.

Google will punish pop ups in the future. [0] I heard something about early 2017, but cannot find where it's written down.

- [0] https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2016/08/helping-users-easi...

I think the best way to go about it is to have a switch/checkbox for the user to opt-in. Only then will the browser prompt the user to enable notifications. It's trivial to make this change.

I'm amazed so many sites have this feature, because it was an absolute nightmare for me to get it working alongside Google's sw-precache library.

One good thing about web notification requests is you can use them as an opportunity to evaluate what sites you want to continue reading on a regular basis. When I get a notification request I always stop and think about it for a minute. If a site isn't notification worthy then is it worth reading everyday? Sometimes yeah but I've been able to purge a lot of sites of my daily reading list using this method. I was surprised at just how many sites I was reading purely out of habit. Being forced to judge their quality / importance to me was super helpful.

Is the new Pop Up Banner Option?

Notifications are the most annoying thing ever. Facebook innovated on the notification icon and concept back in 2008 or so. Since then every one has followed their path. I do not like notifications on my phone unless it is for my email and I am currently on call (Thanks FastMail for having an amazing notification system (real time)).

I've been tossing around building a global notifications blocker.

You could turn it on / off when you just want to browse Facebook or whatever site without the notifications and that tiny red badge nagging you away from what you're doing.