8 comments

[ 149 ms ] story [ 760 ms ] thread
I recently started a project with React Boilerplate. I like its defaults and the discipline it imposes from the start. There is a lot to learn but you can get started by looking at example code included in the project. Would I gain much by adding Structor to an existing project?

One thing I miss from react-rails is error messages with full stack traces and references to source code locations. Is there a way to get this with Boilerplate?

Please update structor npm module: npm uninstall -E -D structor && npm install -E -D structor

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Why people is so interested of Facebook technology with silly licensing, when there is multiple better or similar alternatives available?

Facebook, google - no thanks.

Please update structor npm module:

`npm uninstall -E -D structor && npm install -E -D structor`

Sorry for the inconvenience.

What puzzles me the most, that nobody managed to create highly customizable editor for websites. People have two extremes – create everything from scratch, or use some hardcoded solutions, mostly for people without any programming knowledge.

So the whole niche is empty – for the people who have programming knowledge, but want this task done quickly and with best practices.

This exact solution seems to be too complicated. It is promising, I agree, but without careful consideration of composability we might end up with another monster. Also, I'd like to notice that I think it should be extremely simple, and code should be hidden completely; though the idea of "marketplace" is amazing, because all components, basically, already exist.

I have thought about this topic the same way. But what is that "ideal" solution ? What is the middle ground ? Perhaps a widget/component based drag/drop but customizable HTML/CSS if needed ?