Ask HN: Thinking of moving to Europe from USA

161 points by alexhakawy ↗ HN
Not sure where to begin I am a US Citizen not a felon but wondering what I can do or the process to get started in moving to Europe?

what's it like out there comparing to America. I want a new life fresh start new faces.

I have family in Europe I don't have a degree or anything yet. I know some programming but I plan to live with an aunt out there. No kids no job 26 years of age

238 comments

[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 303 ms ] thread
Find a job in your country of choice and get your visa - then move, about as simple as that.

If you're looking at a job on the continent make sure you know the local language fluently (not English). It is said that its ok to know English alone but it really isn't.

You'll come to the reason that most Europeans in the tech space opt for the US - the compensation factor in Europe is relatively poor.

Lower compensation, but better social security (if you manage to get citizenship), better working hours, more holidays.

I second learning the local language. That is one of the most important requirements to truly integrate.

Having gone through the experience myself it depends what you're aiming at. In my opinion, in the tech space in particular the US is a no brainer for the European to move to:

If you're aiming at your own startup, Europe is downright awful you control the working hours, holidays and social security. Entrepreneurship is terrible because the culture doesn't adapt well to it. Raising cash is like selling a fridge to eskimos. There is a culture of hitting yourself at failure and extremely conservative risk. Your own parents wont support you in a startup.

For a job in tech: In Silicon valley all those things you mentioned are quite easy to come by? Social security, holidays, working hours and even better + a wage which is why the draw is the other way from here.

This is really interesting, I wonder if Stockholm is for some reason in its own bubble when it comes to startups in the EU. We have so many (funded) startups forming here it's kind of getting crazy (but in a good way). I mostly only hear about new games companies forming as that's the industry I'm in - quite a few people have recently left larger companies in Stockholm to start their own game dev studios. I guess with time we will know how successful they will be, but at least the process of branching off and starting your own studio here seems quite accessible.
Social security is mostly independent of citizenship.
You don't have to be a citizen to get at least some forms of social security in many European/Scandinavian countries. Norway will pay me unemployment if I am made redundant even though I am not a citizen because I have been paying tax here for the last thirty years.
Go first, then learn the language. It will be much easier to learn a language when you are in a country that uses it. Tell all your Anglophile friends and colleagues to speak the local language to you as much as possible and attend evening classes for immigrants (many of whom won't speak English). It's much faster and easier than learning it on your own.

I say this from my experience learning Norwegian in Norway which was much less painful and more successful than learning French at school in England even though I had many more hours of formal French instruction.

You can't easily go first because of the Visa issue, where you need the job first where you need the language first.
You won't exactly get fresh faces, but have you thought about working remotely for an American company from Europe? Many companies are open to this and you can skirt visa issues just traveling as a tourist. This way, you can dip your toes into the locale you're interested in with less commitment and upending.
Man, you have a very vauable asset for a tech career - a US Citizenship. I am very envious of folks who have it. The tech career opportunities outside of US are really not that diverse and are heavily scattered across the world - i.e. maybe the rest of the world combined is as interesting tech-wide as US is - but with lower salary and language/immigration barriers (i.e. try job-hopping, over a span of say 5 years, from Germany to New Zealand to China vs NYC to SF to Seattle).
> a US Citizenship. I am very envious of folks who have it.

Not everyone wants to move to/stay in the US, the world has a lot of beauty.

----

I for one am very happy to live in Europe. But Europe is a very diverse continent so it's an extremely broad question. I've lived in a few places within Europe, traveled through others. But there is still so much hidden for me. If I were to move outside I would probably go to Asia.

A lot depends on the kind of career you want to have. If you're happy with staying within the mainstream business/web programming, then Europe does not constrain you that much (except lower salaries, which means less savings, which means retiring later). On the other hand, if you want to go into something niche (compilers, graphics, anything math-based), then US is really the place to be.
There's a reasonable amount of graphics and compiler work in the UK - we have ARM, and Imagination Technologies, plus some other boutique local companies, and offices of international companies like Broadcom and IBM (Hursley did a lot of IBM's JVM work, not sure if that's still going).
> you have a very vauable asset for a tech career - a US Citizenship

DAFUQ ? I am a French research in computer science, now working for a company producing and streaming contents on the web.

I can assure you that my carrer opportunities — as sysadmin, researcher, or developper — are pretty good in France and in Europe :)

(comment deleted)
I didn't say it's impossible, it's merely generally harder and for less money.

Re: sysadmin and developer roles - my post was mostly about diversity and breadth of available roles. These sysadmin and developer roles are generic enough that one will be fine in them in Europe. A sufficiently specialized researcher, on the other hand, usually has only a handful of places in the entire world that are interested in hiring him within his specialty - a lot of which are in the US.

I see this in a friend of mine. He's a young PhD Machine Learning Researcher with top credentials (Ivy League, top publications, won awards in his field). He wants to live in Europe due to family concerns, but he really can't find a position that would allow him use his talent, and is semi-wasting his time in random bad Data Science jobs for now - while he's getting numerous awesome offers from the US (like leading a research unit at Google or faculty positions in Ivy League schools).

> it's merely generally harder and for less money.

My experience has been the opposite in terms of difficulty. In most EU countries the market of software engineers who can also speak the native country's language is really small so its way easier to stand out from the crowd. In the US, you have to compete in a 350 million+ population pool plus global candidates who have studied English their whole lives. In any given EU country the candidate pool is a fraction the size and of those the one's who can communicate fluently in the native language is a fraction of that fraction.

You can't ignore the demand side of the equation though. US is leading economic and military (which leads to lots of tech as well) superpower and a lot of European countries are relatively backwater in comparison.

For example, in the UK, there's little real tech companies and most developer roles are confined to non-tech support roles in other economy sectors (finance, retail etc.).

No? I've worked in plenty of software developer roles in the UK, not sure where this is coming from.
What our disposable friend claimed was that there are few "real tech companies", not that there are few roles. There's some truth in that; there are lots of jobs working for banks, supermarkets, consultancies, publishers, etc, but relatively few in companies which are either pure-play tech (who is the British Microsoft or Dropbox?) or even consumer web (who is the British Facebook or Google?).

That might or might not be a bad thing. It means you're more likely to be working for a real company, with a real business model, rather than some freak kept above by advertising and VC misallocation.

ARM is pretty well known
Yeah that's literally the one that comes to my mind. Germany seems to have a strong robotics market (not only industrial, but also self-driving cars kind of stuff etc.) but most job posts I see are either straight in German or require a good command of it.
I did a search on the most recent How's Hiring thread to see how many jobs are offered in each city. I think it's fair to assume that most people posting there are "real tech companies":

  San Francisco: 170
  New York: 96
  London: 90
  Boston: 38
  Berlin: 34
I just did a full text search so there might be some double counting.
> I think it's fair to assume that most people posting there are "real tech companies":

That is debatable and depends largely on a definition. My viewpoint is that a large portion of the companies in the current VC-inspired "tech" world are merely applying tech and not really developing it. For every company like Datastax there's a dozen of companies which are just applying tech solutions (packaged and sold by other companies) to a specific business/consumer problem.

Or, to put it in other terms, if the job offer does not say "Msc/PhD in X preferred" (where X is the job, like distributed systems, deep learning etc.), then it's likely not quite a "real tech" job.

This is just complete rubbish. Sorry, it looks like you have extremely limited experience of tech jobs outside of the US, and/or are purposefully trolling.
> I see this in a friend of mine. He's a young PhD Machine Learning Researcher with top credentials (Ivy League, top publications, won awards in his field).

There are top-shelf jobs for your friend in Europe. E.g. Google's got large offices in London and Zurich and a quick search shows some possible fits for a PhD in ML. I know from friends that Amazon has a large office in Berlin focused on machine learning research and applications. Microsoft appears to be hiring ML scientists in München.

I agreee with you. As a mexican with no college degree (I'm entirely self-taught), one of my 'career dreams' is to work at a company like Airbnb, Uber, Google, Facebook, etc, but the lack of work visa, or in this case, US citizenzhip, makes it IMPOSSIBLE for me unless I do some crazy stuff like getting an O-1 visa (extraordinary ability). I was offered a Product Design position at Medium but I couldn't move forward because of the visa. I was very sad.

In contrast, working in Europe or Canada is easier because getting a work or resident visa is smoother, but the salary cut is way too much.

There's always the L-1B visa option: work for a company that has offices both in the US and somewhere you can already work. After one year, apply to transfer to the US offices.
That's unfortunately not comparable to a citizenship. With the L-1 visa you get to work for this one company only - and changing jobs is usually essential to building a good career in tech.
Same here. Add the fact that I lived in the USA for most of my life undocumented. I now live in Mexico and doing OK.
> Man, you have a very vauable asset for a tech career - a US Citizenship

This isn't really that important at all. I don't really recognise this as a specific asset in any way.

> The tech career opportunities outside of US are really not that diverse and are heavily scattered across the world

That's an extremely biased and, in my opinion, incorrect view. Even if you just take the big tech capitals in Europe - London, Berlin, Paris etc - you have hugh tech opportunities in each. The opportunities in London alone rival those in New York. Sure there's not really a specific place similar to Silicon Valley - but that's really the only thing missing.

Salaries are much lower.
While I agree they are lower, not much lower, but lower. That's simply because of the market rate. I have some experience hiring devs in London and NYC so can only really comment on those two cities.

You see approx ~20% reduction in market rate salary for a given full-stack position in London vs NYC. However there are factors that the simple NET salary comparison doesn't take into account. Do these factors negate the difference? No, not entirely - but they do reduce that percentage down quite significantly. The major one, which will be of no surprise, is healthcare.

The addition of free healthcare for your family is unlikely to be equal in value directly to the entire 20% salary difference. However, often the fact is it might be worth it anyway just to not have to deal with that, often stressful and extremely difficult to budget for, expense.

These aren't the only QoL differences between the two cities, others are often rather personal/bespoke to the candidate.

The point being comparing net salary between two completely different countries is often not even close to the full picture.

Health insurance is commonly provided by employers if you are a software engineer.
The New World is better for fresh starts than Europe.
Source? Not just an opinion please, I mean an actual source - with facts, figures, data. Also, you would have to define what you actually mean by "better" (as well as what "fresh start" really means). Details. What kind of person (with enough relevant details to actually be a useful description) doing what can expect what based on what where exactly (US and Europe are both huge and very diverse places)?
I'm not obligated to provide a "source." It's called an opinion. If one seeks merely a "fresh start," then just move somewhere else in the USA. If frustrated with the government, politics, culture of the USA, then move to Europe or some other country.
With that attitude you can just pipe /dev/random to the comment section. What's the use of your comments if they contain nothing ob substance? Rhetorical question. I think /r/politics on reddit is far better suited for that kind of "discussion" than HN which aims to be of better quality.
Quite funnny that posts that don't pray as everyone else (eu > us) are being downvoted.
I think Europe is going just as nutty as the states, maybe more. I am betting that the national front wins in France and France drops out; after that the euro collapses and we see a monetary nightmare.
I would like to take you on that bet. I also wonder if you have ever been to anywhere in Europe.
I lived in Germany for a year and have spent time in the UK, Netherlands, Austria, Czech Republic, etc.

Yes, Europe has architecture where the U.S. has decorated sheds. But the social fault lines in Europe aren't that different from the social fault lines in the states.

From day one the pundits have been concerned that effects related to

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impossible_trinity

would blow up the euro -- i.e. Germany and Italy might have reasons to have different monetary policies. Many economists think the situation is truely intractable (they'd like it if the "Impossible Trinity" was a solid concept) but it certainly is intractable if you don't face the social fault lines head on.

He can just pick a country outside the EMU: UK, Czech Republic, Sweeden, Denmark, Switzerland, Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria. The last ones are in danger of entering the Eurozone, ceding control over their currencies to the EU and possibly getting in trouble like Greece did. Capital is already fleeing out of Europe to the US. I'd say it's a bad move to move to Europe right now, unless it's for college/uni and maybe job prospects afterwards. Although he's going to have a hard time as an American citizen because of silly tax agreements the US has with other countries.
I recently moved for an year's assignment to Amsterdam. Intercompany transfer.

The process has been interesting. The main thing which took time was getting my Birth certificate legalized under The Hague convention a.k.a apostilled. After that it's documentation work which my company lawyer handled. Once I got here it's taken time to get used to the differences but thoroughly enjoy it.

Highly recommend it, if you can. The best route has been this - inter company transfer.

Does the US have a working holiday visa arrangement with Europe? This is how I moved, but I was moving from Australia. Got my Australian citizenship and applied for working holiday visa to Sweden. Visa documentation was emailed to me within a couple of weeks of the application. This allowed me to move with my savings and look for a job on-site. The employer I found then helped me out with the process of applying for my employee visa and residence permit once my working holiday visa was near expiry.

If you're a senior dev you may be able to just bypass the "move first" step and get a job remotely with a relocation package. I had experience in my chosen industry but was still considered fairly junior, so moving to the country and applying from there ended up being more productive than looking for a company that would deal with relocating a junior from the other side of the world.

Many (most?) countries will give you a work visa if you have a job offer, and will let you stay if that turns permanent. It's not tied to the US.
Yes, but I'm not really sure what this has to do with my comment? A Working Holiday visa is not the same as a work visa that you get if you have a job offer. The point of my getting a Working Holiday visa was to move to the country for a substantial amount of time (the visa allows 1 year) and look for work while there instead of trying to convince an employer to hire a junior from overseas.

Most EU countries also have restrictions on the employee visas they grant - such as the position having to be advertised within the country (or maybe within the EU) first with some exceptions for very specialist roles, etc. In addition (speaking only for Sweden here) even afterwards it's not as easy as going to the Migration board and going "Well here's my offer, give me a visa!" - the Migration board checks with the relevant union to vet the offer and make sure conditions of employment are suitable. In addition to that queues can be very long, so having the assistance of a larger company that frequently liaises with both the migration board and the unions when applying for a visa can help fast track the entire process.

(comment deleted)
The US has working holiday arrangements with only Canada, Australia, Ireland, South Korea, and New Zealand. In contrast Australia has dozens of countries they can do this with. It's just a bigger part of the culture there, most Americans aren't aware of the existence of working holiday programs.
> what I can do or the process to get started in moving to Europe?

Do your homework? Learn a language besides English (maybe?)

At least rejoice, European visa processes are usually straightforward (if you have a diploma) and it usually involves much less BS and waits than the corresponding H1-B process

I moved from the UK to The Netherlands a decade ago. It was a fantastic decision. It's nice here, most people speak English (although I learnt the language) and there's a lot of demand for Developers. There are also crazy tax incentives which result in you paying basically 0 tax for the first 5 years. That covers the costs of learning the language (3k EUR and it takes 2 years).
> what's it like out there comparing to America

It's totally different country by country. I never been to the US, but I imagine it's much more homogeneous than the EU. For example you can go to Berlin, Barcelona, Milano, Stockholm or Budapest and you can have radically different experiences. It differs radically financially, demographically and attitude wise.

I'd suggest to start with a Euro-trip and visit as many countries as you can and then make a "final" choice where to settle.

From my experience traveling Europe and America, Europe is much more homogeneous even if languages are different.
No way if by America you mean the US.
I'm referring to the US, though to be honest including Canada wouldn't change much. (Mexico is a whole different story) I know it's not a common opinion, which is why I made clear that it's just my experience. I've been to 19 US states and 15 European countries and I found Arizona to be more different from Pennsylvania than Romania was compared to let's say Spain or Germany.
I'd say it's probably a matter of not having a 'european palate' so to speak. It's like if you give two red wines to someone who doesn't usually drink wine. They'll tell you they taste the same, but to someone who drinks red wine daily, they are totally different. I have traveled the US, and have lived in Europe for several years, and would completely disagree with your assessment.
> I never been to the US, but I imagine it's much more homogeneous than the EU

I'd argue they are mostly the same. IMO, The US is pretty similar in structure to the EU where the US as a whole is comprised of many states, each with their own laws. Yes there are federal laws but for the most part, each state can do whatever they want.

Each state / region has vastly different cultures and standards of living.

> Each state / region has vastly different cultures and standards of living.

The culture in the US varies some from region to region (midwest vs northwest vs south etc), but it's absolutely false to say that the differences are "vast", especially on the state-to-state level. Standards of living vary much more between urban/rural even within states than they do across states generally.

Leaving aside the fact that EU states speak completely different languages, the cultural differences there are much, much more pronounced. Everyone in the US speaks the same language, watches the same TV shows, follows the same sports, shops at the same chain stores, etc, etc.

Your comparison of the political structures is also quite off, though not very relevant to the question of cultural homogeneity.

I imagine you are correct that the cultural differences across Europe are greater, and yet everybody in the us definitely don't watch the same tv shows, and if i go to Memphis TN, there are plenty of people who I just can't understand what they're saying for the life of me, even though we speak the same language. (I'm from Montana). Probably not as much as Europe, but it is there.
You're right of course that not everyone watches the same TV shows (etc), but the major cultural divide is urban/rural, not state-by-state or region-to-region.

There was an interesting discussion of this and related topics here just the other day: 'Duck Dynasty' vs. 'Modern Family': 50 Maps of the U.S. Cultural Divide (nytimes.com) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13264083

I moved in the last year from a mid-sized city in the northeast to a sightly smaller mid-sized city in the south, and everyone keeps asking me excitedly about the culture shock. People eat more okra here and it's hard for me to understand the speech of the few people I've met from more rural areas of the state. That's it. The culture here is "mid-sized US city," just like where I came from. It's almost disappointing.

Ireland is richer than the US. Bulgaria is poorer than China. That's the gap.
(comment deleted)
Per capita, Delaware is richer than Ireland (#37 in GDP), Mississippi is poorer than Bahrain (#98). Bahrain is behind Bulgaria (#81). China (#2) is in a class of its own, because of its enormous population.

This sidesteps the question of cultural differences state to state / country to country, or even between urban/rural regions.

Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_between_U.S._states... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nomi...

If you are a programmer/designer you can get a 3 year freelance visa in Berlin, Germany. I currently live in Berlin with that visa.

Your standard of living in Europe will vary. Sure, some places offer free healthcare (not exactly free - see taxes), better public transportation, and decent quality food at lower tier supermarkets. That's all great. On the other hand, you'll likely take a huge hit in salary and pay higher taxes. That does make a difference in lifestyle. A personal anecdote: in NYC I paid $2500/month to live alone in a decent apartment in a vibrant area (East Village). That's a lot of money! In Berlin I paid $700/month for an apartment of similar quality, but because salary and taxes are so low, I wasn't able to save nearly as much as I did in NYC paying high rent, a lot of money for quality groceries, etc.

There are other benefits of living in Europe like 30 days of vacation, ample maternal/paternal leave, and some financial security if you lose your job. That said, it's harder to get these jobs. Because of the risk companies need to take when hiring new employees (ie paying for all the benefits above), there's currently a huge workforce of temporary employees. Everyone is aiming for the seemingly elusive "permanent contract."

I say make the move. You'll learn a lot about the world and yourself. You can always move back to the US.

FYI this comes from the perspective of a software engineer turned entrepreneur turned software engineer.

Berlin freelance visa: https://service.berlin.de/dienstleistung/305249/en/

Good advice, but not having a degree or showing work experience might make it hard to get the freelancer visa. I would also recommend the "preparation for study visa" which gives you two years for taking German language courses and you can always change to the freelancer or work visa before the two years is up. [1] for the OP, without a degree you can still get the work visa if you're hired by a German company.

> what's it like out there comparing to America?

Main daily difference is you don't need a car. Find a job and go there. You need to experience it yourself to really know what it's like.

1. https://service.berlin.de/dienstleistung/305156/en/

(comment deleted)
Thanks for the insight. Could you share more about how you went about getting a freelance visa as a programmer.

Most of the bullet points for Documents Required in you link actually say "not required for freelance" but then I see:

"Proof of a secure livelihood must also include sufficient health insurance."

Did you have to show a current consulting contract?

Do you have to show that you are currently contracting for a company via invoices?

If so does that consulting contract or invoices have to be from a German company or could it for a company in the US?

Is it possible to contact you off list?

I don't want to go into how I got the visa, but I will say that most people get friends with German companies (even single person companies) to write contracts for them :) The contract simply has to state the project, date of future employment, and how much you will be paid upon completion.

The contract can be for future dates. Does not need to be a project that is currently paying you.

I had one German company and one US company. I think it's safer to have at least one German company.

Sure thing, contact me if you need advice. I haven't been through the process in a couple of years but expats talk about it a lot.

I totally understand. What's the best way to contact you? I didn't see an email in your profile. Thanks again. I really appreciate it.
> I wasn't able to save nearly as much as I did in NYC

Never having lived in the US, is the savings you are talking about in terms of percentage of your cost? i.e. if the only cost you have is rent and its 2800 vs 700, i would need to save at least 4 times as much to cover the difference.

Typically these are measured in absolute numbers. I'm not sure why you'd want to measure as relative ratios.
Because i need to be able to cover the costs (i.e. what is the savings in terms of purchasing power rather than absolute savings). If i lose my job tomorrow and my rent is 2800, I don't really care that i save 1k compared to 700 per month (under the assumption i can't increase the purchasing power of my savings somehow).
One idea is that by investing a larger amount of money while living in an expensive area, later moving to a less expensive area (perhaps upon retirement, etc) will leave you with more assets to work with than if you had stayed working in the less expensive area the whole time (and investing a great deal less due to lower wages).
The ratio of savings:spending lets me know when I can retire early.

Using exaggerated figures, if I earn 100k in the US, save 10k a year but I spend 90k, then it's going to take me longer to retire than if I earn 35k in Europe, spend 30k and save 5k. Because in the US, it'll take 9 years to save enough to live off one year, while in Europe it'll take six years to do the same.

Of course you can move to a cheaper country when you retire, but you'll have to rebuild your friendships, adjust to the culture, etc.

You are taking the exactly correct way to think about savings: asset-liability matching, and being realistic about it (not imagining you can move to a new place because 'retired', so do, but many can not do so successfully).
But many can, and do. To each their own.
Indeed. But shouldn't assume the can, because that kind of assumption something many cannot survive.

Sensible planning is asset-liability matching.

But the win in that game is to save 10k per year in the US, then retire in Europe. Get full retirement in half the time.

Many do that within the US with cost of living games. Work in SF for 5 years saving 200k a year. Move to Flordia and be set living in 40k a year for life. (Or some variation thereof)

That works for some. But there is a loss of social capital and cultural capital in moving. Over a few years it's possible to build a new friendship circle (although I'm told that gets harder as one gets older). Additionally, while a basket of goods might be cheaper in Florida, as Rumsfeld said, there are unknown unknowns.

Perhaps Florida is more expensive than you might think because the cost of air-conditioning is expensive. And while lots can go without it, as a non-native, you might find the heat unbearable. I'm using this as an example of why it's difficult to estimate the true costs of living somewhere until you've put down roots there.

Furthermore, when you're on 100k a year and saving $10k, spending $400 on a new phone is a negligible expense. If you're on $30k, and saving $6k it is a bigger proportion of your savings. If you plan on moving, you're going to readjust your standard of living and your creature comforts.

Obviously your strategy can and does work, but counting on a move working out and being able to reduce living costs is a riskier strategy (with a potentially bigger payout), and it comes with its own costs.

(comment deleted)
Absolute numbers. I saved at least 4 times as much in NYC. Don't take this to mean much since I am one data point.
Thanks a lot! I didn't know about this visa. FYI, You may have just changed my life.
One thing not mentioned in this post is the minimum amount you need to have in the bank. I've heard people with as little as 3k, but technically Germany asks that you have 10k in the bank to prove that you are economically viable even between jobs. It's up to the discretion of the person at the Foreigner's Authority who decides on your application.

It is much easier to obtain the freelancer visa after you've worked for a german company for some time. I know people who have been rejected from the freelancer visa for not having sufficient money in the bank.

You can also just ask friends/family to loan you the money so you can take a screenshot of it to show to the person at the foreigners authority ;)

Edit: Also, if you're really interested in moving to Berlin/Germany, I have a bunch of content about this on my blog (incl. the entire process end-to-end) you might find useful: http://notanomadblog.com/categories/work-abroad/

Wouldn't it be smarter to just make use of his U.S. citizenship, contract for a Silicon Valley startup, make like $100k, and just travel in and out of the Eurozone whenever necessary to still be considered a tourist? Seems like he'd probably net around $2k a month after taxes doing that.
> If you spend three months in the Schengen area during any six-month period, you must wait another three months before you can apply to enter the Schengen area again without a visa. If you do not meet these conditions, or plan to stay in the Schengen area longer than three months, contact the embassy of the country where you plan to spend the majority of your time to apply for a visa.

If you are fine with this then that's a good idea. But it's hard to really settle down knowing you need to leave in 3 months, and can't return again for another 3 months. I recommend getting a residence visa like the freelance visa. You can still consult for a US company after getting the visa.

https://travel.state.gov/content/passports/en/go/schengen-fa...

Eek, I thought you only had to leave for UH day, not 3 months. Yeah, that would suck. That's for pointing that out.
Apply? When did this happen? I stayed in a Schengen country for almost a year and came in and out without having to apply for anything.
This is a great summary, nice one! mbrain, move to Europe, you will love the lifestyle. Good luck!
>> If you are a programmer/designer you can get a 3 year freelance visa in Berlin, Germany. I currently live in Berlin with that visa.

For someone like me who doesn't understand German language, is it possible to go on with the daily life interacting with the locals in English?

English is taught in every school in Germany.

You should have it easy to get by.

I don't speak German. In Berlin it's not a big problem, particularly in certain neighborhoods where even waiters at restaurants may not speak German.
In Berlin, sure. The elder may not be able to understand your English.

Some rules of thumb:

1) The younger, the more likely to be able to speak English.

2) Rural area less likely to speak English (well) compared to big cities and tourist areas.

3) In IT/tech world in Germany you should have far less problems than say farmers.

I'd say those count in general though :) if you go to Amsterdam people are much more likely to speak English than a local, small Dutch town foreigners generally haven't heard about. And, English is very practical in our globalised world. Make no mistake about German though; it is also a practical language in Europe.

Do remote work for US company...
I can't find even remote work inside the US lol I know HTML, CSS and basic JS
Nowadays that's like trying to find work as a mechanic because you know how to change a tire.

I know HTML, CSS, JS, C++, C#, PHP and Hack - and I often can't find work because the bar of competence for many programming jobs still requires knowledge of frameworks, libraries and processes that I don't have experience with, and because the freelance market is global. It can be difficult to tick all the boxes and stand out in a crowd of millions.

Good luck than. Maybe worry about the job, rather than about visa.
You can study for cheap and get a student visa in Germany, Austria or an ex Eastern Block country, get a job until senior developer there, then work for a US company.

Forget Italy. Italy is probably nice to live in, but it's at risk of becoming the next Greece right now. Big problems in the banking sector, 1st country for refugees to enter through along with Greece.

1. Learn something that can help you to do stuff that people are willing to pay for. You already know some webdev, so maybe go ahead and spend a couple of months trying out some frontend frameworks. There are ample amounts of frontend jobs everywhere in US, EU and Asia.

2. Find a remote job in US. Even a junior position with a low salary would allow you to live decently in most European places (maybe except downtown London, etc.).

3. Pick a random European city you might like, get an airbnb and just go there for a while.

4. If you like it, stay. If you don't, pick another city. If you can't make the decision in 3 months, move to a cheap place in Asia and go back when you can. Flights are cheap. Places to stay are cheap. Just lower the bar. You don't have to live in the middle of Paris or London this whole time.

5. Travel a lot and profit. Unless of course your prefer to go through a routine of choosing a single place, finding a job in there, networking, making lots of new friends, etc. There's your tradeoff, but hey, you are 26.

[edit: paragraphs]

Europe is big - not geographically, but culturally. As kowdermeister already said, you'll have _very_ different experiences in different parts of Europe. Amsterdam's culture is very different from Barcelona's culture, which is very different from London's culture. Go on a little trip: for Americans I'd suggest Berlin, Amsterdam, London, Madrid, or anything you're interested in.
Europe (the continent) is about the same size as the US, just with twice as many people living in Europe. NA is lots bigger, but a lot of empty space...
I did this: moved to the U.K. for several years. To echo some of the other excellent comments here, I think the main takeaways should be:

1. Compensation is generally lower than in the US. That's worth keeping in mind depending on your age & long terms plans, if you have those already. Don't let it turn you off from the idea, because living elsewhere can be wonderful, but it's worth being clear that this probably isn't the optimal choice for your bank balance/savings. But it doesn't sound like that's your priority, so that's fine.

2. If the primary reason for the move is a lifestyle change, I agree with others that the best way to do that is figure out where you want to live & then look for jobs there (or freelance/work remotely if that suits you). From my personal experience & seeing friends go through it with various countries, it's usually fairly straightforward & a company that wants to hire you should be able to help out with the process.

I'll second Berlin as a really good choice for location: culturally very vibrant & has a rapidly growing tech & art scene. I know several people who have moved there in the last few years.

I'll also say I personally loved living in London, and already being fluent in the language has its perks, but that may not be as much of a change as you want.

Good luck!

freelancing sounds nice but I'm willing to just work out there and start from the bottom to make my way up.
EU citizen currently living in the US here.

Hugely recommended, if only for comparison purposes. From my own experience, English speaking countries are a must. If that's not an option, cities like Barcelona or Berlin should cover your bases for at least a year, but you won't survive for long without speaking Spanish or German. There are more things than work in life, and you'll soon get tired of only dealing with expats or your own nationals.

Please do not fool yourself too early into thinking 'yeah, I'll just learn the thing', unless you have a knack for languages, or you already speak one or two foreign tongues. YMMV though, it is certainly doable if you apply.

Scandinavian countries, Ireland or The Netherlands are your best bet these days, and there is a relatively big IT sector in all of them.

Salaries are not what you expect coming from the US, your $200k rated job is no more than 80k€, but you will certainly require much less. Saving is possible and encouraged.

Edit: grammar

Second this, besides Berlin I would recommend the northern countries. They speak English natively so it's less of a culture shock. You will pay more for rent and necessities than Berlin but salaries are higher too.
>Scandinavian countries

All or some of them? e.g. I've read on HN that there is a lot of software work in Sweden, but how about Norway, Finland and Denmark?

Finland used to host Nokia, and as a result of that there are a lot of local talent that are available easily and cheaply. Unless you have great talent, as a non-Finnish-speaker you'll struggle to compete with them.

That said there are startups here, and there are some niches that are thriving (e.g. gaming).

Good to know, thanks.
I strongly recommend learning German if living in Berlin, but I also know a bunch of Americans living there who get by fine on ten words of German for the grocery store, and the rest all happens in English.
Are you a native German speaker or did you also learn? Any recommendations? I have heard the Goethe Institute is great but its very expensive.
I studied with the Goethe Institute in Sydney and highly recommend it.
I learned but I learned quite early, being an exchange student twice (high school and university, one year each). So I've been pretty much fluent since I was 17, which I realize is much easier than moving there in your 20's/30's.

But if you're in Germany I recommend immersion -- try hard to make friends who don't speak English or at least won't automatically switch into English all the time. That and the Volkshochschule.

Out of country yeah, I think Goethe Institute is the way to go if it's available where you are. Just based on reputation, but it's also a path into the German university system if you're interested in that.

I think that goes for _any_ country you move to. Yes, in many places you can get by just learning "please", "thank-you", and basic numbers.

But learning a language will let you fit in much more easily, and will make people more willing to help you.

(Recently moved from Scotland to Finland. Great country. Horrible language!)

>"Salaries are not what you expect coming from the US, your $200k rated job is no more than 80k€"

Is that a good rule of thumb then? $200k is fairly top end in the US. Obviously there are people at the big SV companies that make more but 200K is pretty close to top end for senior people. So you are saying that that 80K Euros is the general top end for EU tech companies? Given that there is more or less dollar to Euro parity now that is substantially less.

On the other hand you will work a lot of hours for that 200K in the US. Is that also true of the EU for similar? I think that proper work life balance should always be considered in addition to actual compensation.

I was indeed comparing a senior developer salary in SV with an equivalent position in a country like The Netherlands or Sweden. The bottom side of the bracket is more difficult to quantify in my view, and there are other aspects involved such as minimum salary etc.
In Germany the rule of thumb in tech is: no bachelor means some companies cap you at 50k.no way to earn more. 60k is mid level and 80 is senior high level bachelor level.
"In Europe" is kinda broad statement. It's like saying moving to americas. Honduras is not Alaska. Where to, exactly?
London UK or Italy
UK for work, Italy for holidays? To my understanding the employment options in Italy generally suck. If someone has better information please revise.
That's a big life decision.

I've lived in Europe my whole life, but I have a lot of friends and relatives in the US. I've also lived in 3 different European countries, and of course I know people from just about all the Western European nations.

There's a lot got you to think about. This is only a small part, off the top of my head:

- If you're American, you pay tax worldwide. Most countries have higher tax than the US, so you just pay their tax. Switzerland is different. I lived there, it's a pain as an American to even get a bank account. And you'll have to file a return. A friend of mine is half American and is an accountant. It's annoying for him as well.

- Languages. Which do you speak? Most Northern European countries have significant numbers of companies where they speak English. That's not to say you can't learn the language, English is a Germanic language, so not a million miles off German, Dutch, Danish, Swedish, etc. Yet you're not going to understand it getting off the plane.

- Social. Are you coming by yourself or are you married? Got kids? It's hard to find documentation for this, but the way one socialises depends a lot on which country you're in, whether you're in the countryside or the city, and whether you have kids or are single. Anecdotally I'd also say some of the Germanic nations have hard-to-penetrate social circles. It's not that they don't like you, they already have their friends and haven't needed to make new ones since college.

- Culture shock. I guess you actually want that. But remember you can drop a guy from New York in LA and they will not have a problem at all. Take a guy from Edinburgh to Rome, and they are now a tourist. The plus side is it takes a two hour flight to see something completely different, with different looking people, weather, history, and so on.

- Visa. This is going to depend a lot of the specific country.

Anyway I'm sure you'll have questions.

if I have family there do I still need visa to live with them?
You will unless they are closely related enough to give you citizenship rights. Nationality law is completely different from country to country within Europe, though.
It's my fathers sister.
Depends how she got citizenship. If she got it through bloodline, maybe you're eligible too. If not, you can come as a tourist. Probably 3-6 months, depending on country. May be eligible for cheaper visa if you'd supply an invite from her.

Keep in mind that major non-EU countries (US/CA/AU/etc) don't need visa for tourist stuff. You'd get a stamp at airport for x months and that's it.

Depends. Europe is not a single country, it's impossible to answer this question. (unless in the case where you can in every country, but I wouldn't know).
Depends on the country.

It may also matter how much money you make, whether you're married to someone who is taking benefits, and so on. Even for the countries I've lived in, it's been a mess to find out.

And when you do find out, sometimes you find there's some loophole. For instance, if you try to bring a non-EU spouse to Denmark, it's hard if you have low income. However, Sweden is right across the water from Denmark, and there's a bridge connecting them. And the Swedes have a different national law. Also there's EU law, which is another way to get in.

Oh, and the UK voted to leave the EU, so there will be even more legal spaghetti.

Try to narrow down what countries you're interested in, and find someone who can help you.

Unless you're a citizen of a EU country you need a residence permit (people call this "visa", but technically they are 2 different things) to work in a EU country. As a US citizen, you can visit for 90 days without a visa, but after that you'd need something.

AFAIK if you have a grandparent who is an Irish citizen and was born there, you can get an Irish citizenship. That is automatically an EU citizenship, and if you have that you can live and work anywhere in the EU without needing any sort of permit.

But even if you have this Irish grandparent, you can't just move into a EU country and live there BEFORE getting an official document saying you are now an Irish citizen.

I recommend Prague or Bratislava. You can save a lot and get a job in one of the US corps. People are down to earth. They really like americans and will speak english all the time when you are around.
I would also add Wroclaw, Cracow or Warsaw then.
Agreed. Awesome cities. Poles are awesome people as well!
I spent a few years living and working in Europe with EU companies or US subsidies there. The one main gotcha that no one thinks about is the tax and retirement savings side of things, both of which you should probably do.

As a US citizen you're obligated to file (and possibly pay) taxes no matter where in the world you work and reside, no exceptions. It's the price of having US citizenship and access to the US embassy. In most cases you probably won't end up paying anything when you declare the tax you paid in your resident country, but that gets complicated with that country having a different tax year than the US (April to April vs calendar year). Get a competent expat attorney and pay for it to be done for you. There's also the FBAR which you might need to become acquainted with.

As for the retirement savings, lots of countries have their own types of retirement accounts that can be invested in as part of your paycheck. The caveat here is how to repatriate the funds when you leave before hitting your 60's. I haven't found a great way to roll those over to an IRA back in the states yet.

(comment deleted)
Do you really need to declare that you paid taxes in Germany? Isn't there some sort of agreement?
As the parent said, you unfortunately need to declare the income as a US citizen but may or may not need to pay taxes on it.
There's ~90k cap. If your foreign-earned income is less than that, you state the tax paid in Germany and don't need to pay for US taxes. If you make more than ~90k, you have to pay taxes for the amount over ~90k.
Thanks, yeah, I´m trying to understand that.. Since I need to do it for my wife...

It looks super complex :(

I use TurboTax and it's built into the software finally, and makes this quite simple. Originally they just made you look at the tax form and fill it out yourself, but they've really improved the "foreign american" parts of the tax software in the past two years.
Nice! Which version should I use?

Oh boy,just realised that we need to report the last three years too. Called streamlined process... Can they do that?

You would need to buy past versions of the software I think. I don't know how that works -- I just use my parent's copy every year. You get like 3 licenses whenever you buy the software, so if you know someone else who needs to file maybe you can share ;)

But I think you'll have to print them out and mail them in manually, rather than electronic filing. But I haven't tried myself so I'm not sure.

(Edit: To be clear, the tax software is versioned by tax year. So, "Turbotax 2016" is what I will use this year. So you'd have to buy Turbotax 2015, 2014, and 2013 presumably.)

>I have family in Europe

Then if you specify country where they live may be you will get more specific answers.

London UK , and Italy Rome.
The job market in Italy (and Rome) is a very closed circle: hard to get into. Best jobs are in the defence sector but those require clearance.
I dont know the specifics as i'm not a US citizen, but to my knowledge, i think if you earn a wage in another country outside the US, you will have to pay the local taxes and also tax back to the US Gov as well. Someone please correct me or clarify if i'm wrong.
Most western countries have double taxation treaties with the USA, but there is often a period where you have to temporarily pay the taxes in both places and then get a refund on the US portion, which can be very expensive if poorly timed.
made some changes to my post to clear things up. Thanks everyone for the advices.
Concretely, check out DAFT: the Dutch-American Friendship Treaty.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/DAFT

The treaty makes it easier for US Entrepreneurs to open businesses in The Netherlands. It lowers the amount of needed investment capital from €27,000 to €4,500, frees US Entrepreneurs from the points-based test, and removes the benefit to Dutch national interests requirement. The residency permit is good for two years, after which it can be extended.

Go find out. What are your career plans? Do you want to do websites or work in a bar? How do you value short commutes/cheap living costs vs. high incomes? How do you value high income versus rain or snow? if you haven't visited many places in europe, perhaps you have traveled the US can say e.g. "I'd do anything to get Californian climate, I couldn't stand Minnesota"... With some more info we can give you a hint.
Cold weather or hot doesn't matter to me. I enjoy everything. I do want to become a web developer eventually doing remote work but until I learn everything to know about freelance web developing I will work at a bar or warehouse whatever it takes to survive out there. Not sure how the whole Visa thing works or if they'll let me stay there past 90 days I got aunt out there
Prepare to be much worse financially. You will earn less, pay higher taxes (as percentage) and will feel much poorer.

Cars, especially nice ones, are much more expensive (in absolute numbers, not only as percentage of income) to buy and own. Petrol is several times the US price.

Rents are higher in most cities (at least compared to income). Maybe only SV is worse compared to Europe.

All tech gadgets are more expensive, roughly at +20% in absolute terms, because of VAT

And yeah, on top of that you get "free" healthcare, which is usually of very questionable quality.

Do you have more info to support the "usually of very questionable quality" claim?

Edit: corrected "low" to "questionable".

Sorry, I only have my personal experience and that of my family and friends. And I didn't say "low".

Usually it's highly bureaucratic - you have to "climb a ladder" of doctors. First your GP, then a specialist, then, maybe a hospital. You wait a lot (sometimes weeks and months, because you are not "emergency"). And sometimes you encounter outright incompetence and have to go to a private doctor/hospital to have your problems properly attended to.

That summarizes my experiences with the healthcare systems of 4 different EU countries.

What countries? My experiences are excellent in Netherlands & Spain public healthcare. I hear people complain about NHS a lot but never used it so no idea.
Bulgaria, Spain, Denmark, Finland
Do you speak Spanish well? It makes a massive difference... Maybe that goes for the other countries too?
The NHS is very highly regarded in the UK as one of their greatest accomplishment. Brits are proud of their healthcare :)
Well :) I work a lot in the UK and live close to many Brits and they (middle to high class people) whine a lot about the NHS. It being slow and crappy. Like said; no idea if that is true or not.
I'm legitimately surprised to hear that. I haven't had any particularly remarkable experiences with the NHS myself, but I've never heard a british person complain about it - only ever heard praise.
It is definitely true for Poland. As for UK, I had a flatmate with intense head/chest pain wait for 4 hours for an ambulance because he was diagnosed over the phone as not being an urgent case (which was probaby right, as he did not die in the meantime) and that was the wait time for non-dying people.
This is still qualified as an "emergency".
Sorry for the misquote!

The use of "questionable" in that way is a bit idiomatic, I think, as a polite way to say something is bad.

I am not a native speaker and I translated literally from my native language where "questionable" would mean "not guaranteed to be good", but not necessarily bad.
My experience of the NHS in the UK is exactly the same. I've heard of some people gaming the system a little by using private insurance to supplement their healthcare. Then they can get a referral to see a NHS specialist from a private doctor, so no waiting to see a GP who might not give you the referral you want anyway.

Not to say that there aren't also significant problems with US healthcare.

(comment deleted)
Are you trying to spread fud? Because everything you said is either plain wrong or made to sound worse than it is.

1. All prices in europe include tax, unlike in the US where it's customary to not include tax in the price and pay it at checkout. Stuff tends to be more expensive not just because of VAT but also because of shipping prices and extra consumer protections such as mandatory 2 year warranties.

2. Just like in the US, rent varies wildly. In Athens you can pay 100€/month for a studio. In London, you'll find that same studio for 10-15 times that depending where you look. "Compared to income" IME it's about equal if not better - please cite your sources.

3. Healthcare is unquestionably of excellent quality across the board. I've lived in France, the UK, Greece, Sweden, there's no exceptions.

4. Petrol prices are kinda irrelevant when you don't need a car. European cities are far, far more tightly packed than the west coast. In all capitals you can get all your stuff done by foot, metro or cycling.

What you're somehow forgetting however while complaining about earnings is that as a US citizen, you need to watch out for double taxation when moving to a different country. So I don't know, your post here is actually super counterproductive.

What you say is correct. All things have variations. The Athens flat for 100 euro (though I highly doubt the price you cite) has it's equivalence somewhere in cheap cities of the US

I never said that healthcare was "bad", only that it has its problems.

Please note that I didn't say that Europe is worse, just that you'll be worse financially, which I didn't see you disproving.

I can cite that price from personal experience :)

You said healthcare is of "questionable quality". Everything has its problems but as far as I'm concerned, healthcare in europe is top notch. You certainly don't hear about "healthcare horror stories" in europe, unlike in the US...

I'm not sure what "worse off financially" even means. It depends. For a long time I was working from home for an international company and earning far more a month than I'd need in a year. Like you said, there are equivalents in the US.

And yet you still don't disprove his point. "More than needed in a year" doesn't deny a relatively inferior financial position.
Is "working 1 month to be well off for the entire year" an inferior financial position to you?

I have news for you: for nearly the entire rest of the world, it's not. Leave your bubble for the new year, will ya?

I also am happy with my financial situation. That doesn't mean that what I said is not true. Salaries which a re "standard" in the US, like 100-150k USD are very hard to attain in Europe, working for European employers. They are certainly not "standard".
Not only is that untrue in several places (Zurich, Stockholm, Paris and until recently London) but you simply can't look at it using just the raw numbers; you have to take perks, quality of life and how much you're actually saving up into account.

Six figures is barely enough to keep up with living costs in some parts of SF, whereas in Greece it's 1-2 orders of magnitude lower depending on which part you live in.

(comment deleted)
Depends where you are. You'll probably make way more in Switzerland than in the US for equivalent positions.
(comment deleted)
(comment deleted)
Don't know why you are being downvoted - what you write is in general correct.
Parent is being downvoted because what they wrote is in general incorrect.
It is not.

Living standards (GDP pr person) are lower in Europe. And developer wages are certainly a lot lower.

GDP per person =/= Living standards...
Whether or not living in Europe or US is more expensive depends entirely on your life situation.

If you're single with no dependents and you're healthy (and don't get an expensive sickness), then I would mostly agree US is better financially.

If, on the other hand, you have kids, and/or some sort of health condition, it becomes pretty much a wash, or in favor of (some) European countries.

Those higher European taxes pay for things that you pay out of pocket in the US. If you're not using those type of services, then you're financially better off in the US.

Absolutely true. And when you have in mind that I am actually writing to the OP, who is young, presumably healthy and in the beginning of his career, it's easy to agree that he is not taking a (financially) smart decision by moving to Europe.