72 comments

[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 79.0 ms ] thread
That is awesome! I cant wait to see one of those in a coffee shop.
I can't wait to see one of these on an airplane... just hope I'm not the poor sod in the next seat!
That would be a hell of sight. Bonus points if they have all the displays folded out while reading their kindle :p
Obviously those who can afford them also fly first class.
(comment deleted)
I'm curious how long the battery lasts. That thing must have a beefy discrete GPU given Razer's pedigree.

I'm guessing 2 hours might be wishful thinking (which is actually OK for me, since I'm plugged in >90% of the time).

> I'm curious how long the battery lasts. That thing must have a beefy discrete GPU given Razer's pedigree.

I guess that the dGPU is only used when all three screens are extended or an application that requires a dGPU is running. Similarly to MBPs which by default use the Intel GPU and only on demand switch to the dGPU.

I think the latest onboard Intel graphics (the ones used on gaming laptops at least) can drive a trio 4k screens [1] - I assume that would allow the battery last longer when not gaming. FWIW (anecdotal), I have a 4K non-touch Windows laptop with nVidia dGPU switching, and I can barely get 3h on battery (am a heavy Chrome user).

[1] http://ark.intel.com/products/88967/Intel-Core-i7-6700HQ-Pro...

That might be due to a lack of Chrome optimization on Windows - on OS X Chrome activates the dGPU for me only when something employs WebGL or plays any form of media.
Not just any beefy discrete GPU... a GTX 1080.
Please support vPro (VT-d, TXT and TPM) and lots of RAM for security virtualization use cases, e.g. Qubes secure compositing desktop with colored borders around VM windows, or Windows 10 Enterprise virtualization-based security.
They really should walk over to LGs booth and take a look at their small, flexible OLED screens. These babies would make great panels for foldout screens as they are crazy slim.

Even the TV-Size ones are only 2.57mm thick.

(I badly want slideout screens, although at a 13 inch formfactor. My Dream would be something like the Surfacebook, with the option to slide out screens on both sides)

It looks nice and all, but Razer's customer support and driver software is abysmal - that cannot be overlooked.
Let's not forget build quality. They're the only¹ brand of mouse I've ever had die on me — multiple models, within 6 months of use.

A Boomslang or whatever it was called back in the day, then two Diamondbacks within a year, in like 2007.

I've had friends say their Naga and Lachesis or whatever die within a year too, usually the buttons or entirely.

I've now used a Logitech G1 since 2007 or so, with extremely heavy gaming abuse, and no problems at all. I am considering buying several more off eBay just so I can use it forever in the case this one breaks.

¹: Okay, I had the wheel go out on my $20 "Logitech Wheel Mouse" from 1999 after 10+ years of heavy use, and a $10 Dell generic mouse at the office after 5 years of heavy use. Just the wheel though. Might have just been dust, really, and fixable for both. The Logitech was used to death in gaming for at least 5+ years.

My Razer DeathAdder (which I bought because it was the top pick on the Wirecutter) lasted about a year before it started giving me phantom clicks. I bought the DeathAdder after a similarly priced Logitech bricked itself after about six months.

These days, I just buy cheap wired mice, because I don't really trust the expensive ones.

> These days, I just buy cheap wired mice, because I don't really trust the expensive ones.

Yea, that's why I like my G1. It's built to last abusive clicks and has only 800DPI, which is perfect for me.

I still have my MX500 - love that mouse.
I loved my ASUS ROG Gladius It comes with different pressure switches and is easy to change the switches (Bad switches is what killed all my other mouses before) and a detachable cord. I've had it 2 years and it is a tank. I hate switching mice.
YMMV; I have a Razer Diamondback that's seen almost daily use since 2005 with no issues.

Conversely, had a super nice Logitech MX crap out on me in a year or so.

I wanted to get a Razer Blade Stealth but the internet is plagued with ugly customer support stories and QA issues.

No thanks.

In addition to build quality issues, Razer's products are often inherently broken by design even if you get a "working" one.

Their Core dock, the Stealth ultrabook, and the Orochi mouse, are all currently sold and not one of these products is fully functional with itself/its counterparts, even if you get a "good" unit.

Their designs are often neat / interesting / innovative. But until they learn how to create and ship working functional products, it's all just pretty artwork.

Quick, @TimCook... look here.
Reminds me of Lenovo's dual display laptop, and its truly awful advert:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MhGkxkzmPbQ

That advert is amazing. It's as if they gave $200 to a couple of their staff and said "we need an advert by this afternoon!"
Isn't the W-series business-class? This seems pretty out of place for marketing towards corporations.
You'd be surprised before 2000 or so.
Wow, when I went to hit the back button in my browser, a jarring "HEY, BEFORE YOU GO" pop-up appeared on the page, prompting me to do whatever. Haven't seen that trick before! Nice to see annoyance-delivery is still an area of active innovation.
Good old times when the "window.unload" and "mouseout" events were used to annoy people.

At least it only does it once, unless you clear the browser cache.

    // view-source:http://www.razerzone.com/project-valerie:1667
    setTimeout(exit_signup, $('#signup_new_exit').data('popout-exit-time') || 15000);
    function exit_signup(){
      if (typeof(Storage) !== "undefined") {
        if(!localStorage.getItem("exitintent_signup")){
          addEvent(document, "mouseout", function(e) {
              e = e ? e : window.event;
              var from = e.relatedTarget || e.toElement;
              if (!from || from.nodeName == "HTML") {
                if( e.clientY < 0 && !localStorage.getItem("exitintent_signup")){
                  signup_new_exit_popout();
                  localStorage.setItem("exitintent_signup", "true");
                }
              }
          });
        }
      }
    }
Oh man, I see that all the time. Mouse leaves the window and I get a fullscreen ad begging me to sign up.

Half the time, I'm still reading the damn article, I was just playing with the mouse. Now I have to find your hidden Close button to keep reading. Go to hell, marketers.

Yea I see the "subscribe to our newsletter popup before I even get a chance to read anything" pattern all the time. This is the first time I've seen it actually wait and trigger on my taking an action to close the site. I mean, I guess that's kind of better than doing it just as I've read 3 words into a 3000 word article...
FWIW, the Esc key normally gets rid of these. Regardless, it is such an annoying marketing trick. Who knows... it must still provide a positive ROI if so many sites are still using it, unfortunately.
The esc key is about 50/50 for me, at best. I usually find that the back button is more effective.
cmd+w tends to work well. As for ROI, as a former ecomm product manager I can tell you that our marketing department's reasoning for requesting the feature was not based on ROI, rather, herd mentality. And, once a feature is there, it's extremely difficult to remove.
You also have to love how snarky those ads are. "Yes, I want to drown in spam." "No thanks, I'm a total scumbag!"
Exit intent marketing. You must not do a lot of shopping online -- or you're shopping at classier places than I work at.
Annoyance-delivery Innovation? This has been almost as old as the web (window.unload hook).

What has also been as old as the web is the first voted comment on any HN story being some totally irrelevant gripe.

The first thing it reminded me of was the ThinkPad W700ds, but I didn't remember the second display was that small.
I wonder if something like that was the reason they keep calling it "the world’s first AUTOMATED triple display laptop" (emphasis added). Is/was there another triple display laptop for which you had to manually extend the screens?
I previously ran a quick Google search and found no other triple-display laptop, but I must admit I didn't spend too much time looking.
Looks heavy. And fragile.
Props on them doing something new, I guess.

But also yeah, looks like a hinge can easily snap off... and knowing Razer's wildly fluctuating quality in its products, this thing is "Hingegate" in the making. Calling it right now.

3x 17.3 inch screens < one 40" screen

The 40" will have double the surface area. And can be had for under $500!

http://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/by-usage/pc-monitor/best

That's a misleading metric.

You could just as easily say this laptop has the equivalent of a dozen 1080p screens, but at that pixel density, it's misleading too.

But the 40" it doesn't fit into a 11" × 6.2" box when you carry it around. And it doesn't have the wow factor with friends.
Finally, I can program on the go :^)
Reminds me of the Dell XPS laptops which were like bricks, incredibly heavy. Not to mention the battery life was awful and the power brick was huge. Two of my college roommates had them and I remember they had huge backpacks and lugged them around campus.

I guess the people who would want these laptops don't care too much about portability or battery life?

I imagine this Razer "laptop" will have a price-tag of at least $5,000 and will have a battery life of less than a movie. This is a dogshow hardware to give to a few enthusiasts, industry people, and trade floors to build up the brand; it's more of a "we're enthusiasts too" brand pitch than it is a product.
Maybe not at that price point, but I would consider buying one. I normally use 3 screens and I like to travel.

The segment of the population that requires a real GPU to get work done buys desktop replacement laptops and probably always will. Not everyone is a "digital nomad" or whatever. Sometimes you've just got to show a client a few tens of millions of polygons of art/CAD and you want to apply the finishing touches on the plane ride over cause you're way behind.

Though admittedly it's more likely to be a Dell Precision or a BOXX than this monstrosity I think there's more room in this market segment than you might think.

I wouldn't bet on a lower price point or any sort of portability with a GTX 1080 (the lightest 1080-equipped single-screen laptop I could find is over 7lbs).

> I think there's more room in this market segment than you might think.

I have an external display that I bring along to try to bridge the gap in loss of productivity of working in annoying places, but it (asus mb168+) has garbage drivers (can't adjust brightness on OS X or windows 10; crashes OS X), which is why I'd even consider a native multi-screen device. I think there's more room in the "external displays that aren't terrible" market than the big/heavy performance desktop-replacement market.

Its got a GTX 1080 so they can ditch the screens and bundle a VR headset and give you virtual screens through Big Screen!
You can't read in VR for very long and it's probably the number one thing you do with your screen.
Good on them for calling it a "Mobile Desktop" instead of a laptop.
This might be when calling something a notebook instead of a laptop and making a big deal about the name is worthwhile.

I can't really imagine trying to use this on my lap.

Opposite meaning today?

I went to check and 9 years ago laptops were bigger then notebooks.

Back in 2008 - What is a Laptop Computer? (n.) A laptop is a small, portable computer -- small enough that it can sit on your lap. Nowadays, laptop computers are more frequently called notebook computers, though technically laptops are somewhat larger in size than notebooks, in both thickness and weight. - http://www.webopedia.com/DidYouKnow/Hardware_Software/laptop...

Interesting. I was never aware of any actual distinction between them, I always assumed they were alternative names for the same thing. A niche technical marketing failure, at least in my case.
At first, I thought "damn, I want one right now."

But then I realized something - most of the time, when I use a laptop, I'm fairly space-sensitive. You can't use one of these on a train, tram, bus, plane, or in any situation where there are people next to you.

And even when there is enough room, you pretty much instantly give up any semblance of privacy. Even though 99.9% of the time what I have on my monitor isn't something that I'd mind a random person seeing, sometimes it is. My current laptop's an Ideapad Yoga, 13" screen, and if I close a window and a sensitive document, or picture, or what have you is on the screen it's not a big deal. My body easily hides the screen from anyone behind me, and since the laptop is so small it's usually kinda tricky to see stuff on the screen from the sides anyway. Besides, I'm one of several people in the (train car|bus|plane|area) that have a laptop open, so usually nobody's watching my screen anyway. If someone's got one of these things? I'm going to take a look at it, probably look at what they've got open and what they've got on the screens. So are the other 40 people around me.

When they say "mobile desktop", that's exactly what it is, to me. If you use the 3 screens anywhere you wouldn't use a desktop PC, things become awkward. The problem is that the vast majority of places where I use my laptop aren't places I'd use a desktop PC.

I wonder if there will be an option to keep the two extra screens collapsed. Certainly there's still the weight factor, but this would allow it to be more compact and would probably extend battery life considerably (though I imagine it will still be laughably bad).

I think it would be awesome to have access to three screens when you're on the road, but this thing definitely won't be replacing any ultrabooks anytime soon.

I think there is a comedy routine in there somewhere. Imagine the passenger in the middle seat of a crowded flight and suddenly their laptop keeps growing and growing :-).

IBM did a similar idea with a dual screen thinkpad, it was not very successful. My impression was that it just didn't make a lot of sense. Imagine a couple of USB-C connected displays on either side when you wanted them, no need to lug them around when you didn't. That would seem to be a bit more sensible to me.

Heh, funny you mentioned the IBM laptop. I actually have been thinking of getting one of those (W700ds) and gutting them to be more modern. I like it cause it's IBM (so pretty strong), the second screen is small-ish and not that intrusive, it's easy to take in or out, and it wouldn't take up that much space on a train/plane/wherever.

But yeah, I'm with you that I'd like a mini display that's detachable instead. I think one exists, but horribly overpriced, ugly, and horrible resolution.

Also, on every laptop-like device I've used, there are four things that ever break (well not counting cosmetic damage and five if you count hard drives; I've been lucky with memory). Two of these are display hinges and the display cable. Three integrated displays sounds like asking for trouble. Seperate displays like you suggest might at least make it easier to replace the parts that break. Also you could then use them on a different laptop more easily too.

(The other two things that break for me are the power connection inside the laptop and the power cord where it bends just outside the laptop. I don't think I'm that rough on them...)

> You can't use one of these on a train, tram, bus, plane, or in any situation where there are people next to you.

Oh you can. You just use the display that gets slided at the front position.

> And even when there is enough room, you pretty much instantly give up any semblance of privacy.

I have a 3M display view protector foil. Works quite well, except if the spectator is directly behind you.

can see it being useful for people who do a lot of business travel. you use it in single screen mode in public places, and expand to three-screen back in your hotel room or on your desk at the client's site.
AWESOME. I want one. :)

Now if they only did it in the 12" and 15" as well....

really not feeling that keyboard layout. I really hate an off-center keyboard on laptops (like ones with a number-pad). I actively seek out machines that have the keyboard centered. Otherwise really interesting concept.
Oooh, a laptop with the touchpad next to the keys, not underneath! I want one!
Shit! I didn't realize that until I saw your comment.
I never seem to have been able to purchase a razer laptop. I recall there was one with a built in touchscreen at one point, possibly a keyboard with a built in touchscreen too, but have never seen it for sale. Do they ever come to fruitition? :(