There's an interesting conflict in the wired article here - it claims the photo to be a selfie taken by the animal (and I'm assuming Indian copyright law would similarly classify animal-taken photos as non-copyrightable) but then later on refers to them as "his photos" (presumably referring to the main image in the article).
"Takes a Selfie" is disingenuous at best - the cat was caught on a motion-sensing camera. It seems like Wired was just trying to put a buzzword in the headline.
@garblegarble it seems pretty clear that the photographer would own the copyright.
When did tripping IR sensors become 'taking a selfie'? By that logic, every time I'm on a security camera it'd be a selfie - and by extension that would be my copyrightable imagery.
Like, in the dorm hallways? Were they scavenging food? Were they eating freshmen? What's the protocol for when you are greeted by a leopard when you're getting up to piss in the middle of the night?
I remember back when I was a kid my uncle told me a story about a night watchman who had a few drinks to alleviate the boredom of his job. He got really drunk and wondered off into the jungle ( back then the line between where the city starts and the jungle begins was shall we say blurred, probably still is ). Anyway they found his half eaten body the next morning not far from his post. I think my uncle told me that story to scare the hell out of me but, it had the opposite affect. I just said that that was the coolest thing ever and we should go leopard hunting.
Every human in Mumbai is probably hunting that cat now. I wish a conservationist had seen the photo first. The article is likely a death warrant for the cat.
25 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 73.9 ms ] threadhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbScW81yYKU
@garblegarble it seems pretty clear that the photographer would own the copyright.
Ridiculous article, ridiculous headline. Click-bait...
we had leopards in the dorm at night.
they eat dogs. They usually dont attack humans.
Note to Wired: "Enlarge Photo" doesn't mean what you apparently think it means.
http://i.imgur.com/EHnTYef.jpg
I think that is the original size, I uploaded it to imgur so the source didn't get killed. https://theculturetrip.com/europe/united-kingdom/articles/20...
Edit: sorry it looks like imgur resized it? the original was 4928x3264 https://cdn.theculturetrip.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/-n...
Mumbai is also unusual in being a large city that has a national park within its limits.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_coyote https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanjay_Gandhi_National_Park
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/nayan-khanolkar-mumbai-bb...
You can read from the summary his motivations for his project shooting this image....