Cor blimey. That is one heck of a whinge. What's the quote? Spotting problems without offering a solution is not criticism. It's called whinging? The parenthesised argumentative additions to every wrong or right conclusion drawn is just perposterous and utterly childish.
As to the actual meat of the article, the whole thing seems to be yet another "us" "them" hit piece, another partisan hate-brew in a long line of clickbait...
I don't really understand why the writer disagrees with "white men" belief that it's pipeline issues rather than anything else. I mean, they offer zero counter other than essentially "women don' believe in themselves enough and it's the white man's fault". That's a pretty thin and tired counterpoint. What does the writer want (since there's a clear bias here)? Companies to not hire based on merit?
1 comment
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 9.6 ms ] threadAs to the actual meat of the article, the whole thing seems to be yet another "us" "them" hit piece, another partisan hate-brew in a long line of clickbait...
I don't really understand why the writer disagrees with "white men" belief that it's pipeline issues rather than anything else. I mean, they offer zero counter other than essentially "women don' believe in themselves enough and it's the white man's fault". That's a pretty thin and tired counterpoint. What does the writer want (since there's a clear bias here)? Companies to not hire based on merit?
Isn't that discrimination in itself?