Ask HN: Why are web directories dead?
I wondered how many other job search sites there are that I don't know about, and this immediately made me think of web directories. Gee, wouldn't it be great if all job search sites were in one list that someone maintained?
I went to DMOZ (the "open source" directory) and typed 'job.' Went to the appropriate section and a lot of the results were outdated including missing the $62mm startup that's #3 in Google. I applied to be an editor after carefully putting together an application, and was denied exactly 4 minutes after -- with no reason why. DMOZ basically seems rotten to the core and outdated as it's used by a lot of self promoters.
My question is, why isn't there a good web directory out there? Internet advertising is many billions of dollars large... unnecessarily. If there was a directory, people would have an easier time finding sites they like.
8 comments
[ 4.5 ms ] story [ 39.0 ms ] threadGoogle doesn't really seem to know what's relevant when I search for "job search". The first page of results is okay, but the rest has lots of odd results. (Eg. Job search pages of particular companies when there are surely more broad job search sites that I'd rather see)
Even the jobs posted on jobs sites can be fake. Understand first how companies employ people, through friends of a friend, etc.. and it will be much easier to find what you want.
Additionally, categorization is useful for quickly answering only a tiny subset of query types.
The only hard part is to be objective about listing pages, or just list those who you see fit.
DMOZ had a history of being very strict with applications of both, editors and sites and in the end was primarily used to improve ranking.
In my opinion, the future of web directories, if there is any, is a combination of strict moderation, wiki-like collaboration and automated processes. Some questions will arrive from personalization and real-time content (think of news, weather, twitter/blogs...)