2 comments

[ 6.5 ms ] story [ 22.9 ms ] thread
Yes, it's old by academic standards. And do read the comments. Remember that getting something through peer review is not unlike a siege, but once within the fortress walls, a mighty army guards glamorous findings against high-profile refutation.

But in the interest of "balance" here it is.

Only saccharin is mentioned in the figures; did they only test saccharin and then generalize the result to all NAS?!