6 comments

[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 24.5 ms ] thread
Not too beautiful.
What don't you like about it?
He has an interesting eye for the built environment. Nothing I'd hang, but there's an appeal in some of his work.
(comment deleted)
The interesting part in your comment is the triggering of the old aesthetic discussion about photography and beauty.

Beauty in Photography by Robert Adams might be an interesting starting point to expand your comment:

http://aransomephoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Robert-A...

Regarding the photography of Wouter Rietberg, there is probably a certain beauty which can touch and can be related to a specific cultural background (maybe an heritage from the Bauhaus design). Everyone is influenced and maybe your perspective of beauty is composed from your own cultural heritage.

On a personal level, I find the work of Wouter Rietberg very dense but towards this too perfect or describing too-polished structure of the world. I'm missing a bit the human imprint or decision to make the photography more natural. It doesn't mean it's ugly or not beautiful, it's just I don't feel my sense of beauty being touched by this photographic approach which looks a bit systematic to my eyes. I'm sure many photographer or viewer might be touched by this systematic approach.

Maybe we're just all blind due to our own perceptions.