Ask HN: Any Headphone Recommendations For Around $100 US?
Hey all.
My wife and I decided that for our anniversary this year we'd both get $100 to spend on whatever we want. I've wanted a nice set of headphones to use when coding/mowing/etc, but have yet to purchase any because I do not know which to buy.
A couple of guidelines: I like noise canceling, but that usually pumps up the price and I hate when headphones require an extra battery. I usually prefer over-the-ear headphones to earbuds, but I won't rule earbuds out.
Kind of an oddball question, I know, but the fact is that I respect you all's opinions quite highly especially when it comes to which tech to buy.
I appreciate any assistance you might provide!
40 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 87.2 ms ] threadI'd suggest earplugs over headphones for mowing, unless you're trying to lose your hearing (or have a really quiet mower). =)
The noise isolation alone an in-ear headphone can provide gives them a major leg up.
There are some great ones out there (like the Shure.)
Just keep in mind that if you're in an office, people will end up needing to touch you to get your attention. You really can't hear anything if music is playing.
They are earbuds, but they are amazing. They don't noise cancel, they noise isloate. I wear them in NYC, and whether it's a loud subway, a bus, or a jackhammer, I can keep the volume way low, and still hear the music. It's also great for your long term hearing health since you will keep the volume way low. Before I got them my iPod was at 75% volume. With them, anything over 25% is too loud. Perfect for mowing the lawn, though.
There is one con with these and that is they are fragile. The buds themselves will never have a problem, it's the cord and TRS conenctor. They will break at some point, but Etymotic is very good about giving you an RMA repair/replacement even after warranty is expired. I got tired of that, though, and I soldered on my own connector that was far more durable.
Another great sounding set is the Audio-Technica ATH-M50. I bought my brother a pair for $100 new on eBay. They're more durable than the HD280s, and fold up better for portability.
Avoid the HD202 unless you have small ears. Also avoid anything from Grado; they're totally open (lots of sound leaks in and out), and are mostly appropriate for rock (they have a very "colorful" sound -- not at all faithful to the source material). Don't go anywhere near Bose. You'll get a lot better sound for a hell of a lot cheaper from just about anything made by Sennheiser, Audio-Technica, Beyerdynamic or AKG.
This is a great source for info: http://www.head-fi.org/forum/ Try not to get too sucked into the hi-fi tomfoolery though, for $100 you can get a great set of cans, and a laptop or mp3 player will be a sufficient driver. A lot of the higher-end gear will require an amp to sound decent, and there's some wickedly diminishing returns once you pass the $100-200 point. There are a lot of conflicting reviews on that site, but there's seems to be a general consensus about certain models (the ATH-M50 is widely respected, for example).
[For the best noise blocking (aside from in-ear), you want a set of closed "circumaural" (around the ear) headphones. Open-back cans don't block any external sound, so you have to crank up the volume to drown it out.]
For music, I have a pair of Shure E2Cs. They not only block out sound really well, but in my opinion produce very good sound. One big advantage of in-ear design like this is that you can significantly lower the volume of your sound source, which will keep your ears happy and healthy. But not everyone feels comfortable with the in-ear style. When I bought the Shures they were @100; today the Shure SE210s are available for $100, but I don't know their product line very well, so I don't know the difference, say, between the SE210s and the cheaper SE110s.
Also note that with most of the in-ear headphones, you can take them to an audiologist and get custom plugs made, as well. It's probably not worth it to buy a $100 set of headphones and then pay an extra $100 to get custom molds, but if I were purchasing a higher end set of Shures (or a similar product from Westone or Etymotic), I'd get the molds.
http://www.shure.com/americas/products/earphones-headphones/...
Stay away from anything by Sennheiser or Bose. Bose is crap, and Sennheisers are nice, but just overpriced. For comparison, my Shures plugged directly into iPod (shitty built in preamp) vs. Sennheiser HD650s ($500 headphones) WITH a $275 preamp (so my $140 setup vs an $800 setup), my Shures won by a slight margin.
If not these, anything Shure.
The best large diaphragm in your price range is the Sony MDR-7506. It's a stunning headphone for the price. Almost every professional recording studio I know has a couple from that product line on hand.
As others have pointed out, there are a couple of good earbuds in your price range, but this runs against your preference. Earbud sound depends a great deal on fit, and it's harder (==$$$$) to get good bass reproduction on something that small than it is to get it on an overear pair.
Seems to be even cheaper now, sitting at around 80 bucks.
http://gizmodo.com/5033455/ultimate-cut+the+crap-in+ear-head...
/edit to fix the link
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000B5XU06
I love my 240s...
http://www.amazon.com/AKG-Acoustics-K-240-Studio-Headphones/...
they are wonderful. Great sound and very comfortable. You could keep them on all day and ears won't hurt.
http://www.klipsch.com/na-en/products/image-s4i-similar/
No offense, but do you have to wait for a year to get to spend 100$ for whatever you want ? Man, you make me feel bad.