If you've reached a point where this is even a question, it's time for you to get out and find something else to do with your time.
Employment is not chattel slavery, if you are dissatisfied with your workplace to the point where you want the organization to fail; then either fix the issues that are making you feel that way or get out.
No could mean I have lack of motivation for their success, or presence of motivation for their failure. This is where I like the geeky preference voting instead of yes/no, because it includes motivational nuance. The scale is:
+1 strong yes
+0 ambivalent, prefer yes
0 ambivalent
-0 ambivalent, prefer no
-1 strong no
in this case I would put +0 as I don't want them to fail and leave me unemployed, but I can't put +1 because more success means more customers and we can't scale customers without more effort, so more success means more work and stress for the same pay, which is worse for me.
My ideal is enough customers to keep us afloat, minimum viable effort, the company's ideal is max customers everyone at full effort, max profit. That's a conflict of interest right there.
3 comments
[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 14.7 ms ] threadEmployment is not chattel slavery, if you are dissatisfied with your workplace to the point where you want the organization to fail; then either fix the issues that are making you feel that way or get out.
My ideal is enough customers to keep us afloat, minimum viable effort, the company's ideal is max customers everyone at full effort, max profit. That's a conflict of interest right there.