> [...] there is no question that women cannot think as men do and vice versa
This is garbage. The tone of the article often implies that the way women think is superior to the way men think, but none-the-less, this is sexism. As a woman it is extremely frustrating to be continuously pigeon-holed because of my anatomy. I'm sure it is equally frustrating for men.
> Rather than demand a return to her own domain (e.g. to be paid and recognised for the ‘uneconomic’ shadow-work she had been doing), rather than refuse entry into the nightmarish market-economy, [...] she instead accepted the assumptions of the male world and began to fight for ‘equality’ and ‘recognition’ within it.
I have absolutely no desire to be relegated to the realm of home-keeping, whether or not such work would be fairly compensated. No shade to those who prefer such a lifestyle, but the choice is what is key here. To have your experience limited is the true nightmare.
1 comment
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 7.0 ms ] threadThis is garbage. The tone of the article often implies that the way women think is superior to the way men think, but none-the-less, this is sexism. As a woman it is extremely frustrating to be continuously pigeon-holed because of my anatomy. I'm sure it is equally frustrating for men.
> Rather than demand a return to her own domain (e.g. to be paid and recognised for the ‘uneconomic’ shadow-work she had been doing), rather than refuse entry into the nightmarish market-economy, [...] she instead accepted the assumptions of the male world and began to fight for ‘equality’ and ‘recognition’ within it.
I have absolutely no desire to be relegated to the realm of home-keeping, whether or not such work would be fairly compensated. No shade to those who prefer such a lifestyle, but the choice is what is key here. To have your experience limited is the true nightmare.