Do Not use namecheap.com for any large site or important domain
I run a forum site with MILLIONS of visitors and about 5,000 TB of traffic per month. Namecheap.com suddenly sent me a link warning that they will suspend my domain completely within 24 hours, if I did not delete two problem images (which were inappropriate/troublesome images but in the context of the forum posts, "a very poor attempt at humor"). I deleted the images and avoided being suspended, but the way they threatened to suspend my domain due to two images was ridiculous. If I missed the warning email or checked my email after 24 hours they would have completely suspended my domain. I'm talking about a site with MILLIONS of visitors per month and ten thousands of posts per day, not some small blog.
They may be suitable for some blog, but I can now say to NEVER use them for any enterprise site.
22 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 47.5 ms ] threadI am considering them and a few foreign registrars right now.
I still am in shock how namecheap might have suspended my domain.
I don't even use their nameservers... They threatened to yank my domain in a registrar level which is so amateurish it shocked me.
It is ridiculous that they gave me 24 hours to delete two images or suspend my domain without any warning. I didn't even know that was possible! If I had missed their email or checked my email 24 hours later, my domain could have been suspended. This is a site with visitors in the range of hundred thousands per day...
I am still shocked on how they managed this.
If this is action they take at scale with millions of visitors I wouldn't even risk it with something so intimate as a blog.
Anyways, if your domain sites contents break the AUP at https://www.namecheap.com/legal/universal/universal-tos.aspx , it seems they will suspend your domain that fast...
Again ridiculous. They even replied "Yes, we have checked the content of the web-site and based on its not deliberate nature we have provided a reasonable time-frame for removing the illicit content."
Reasonable time-frame being 24 hours. More ridiculous.
b.t.w. hosting and DNS registration are totally different, legally and technically.
Don't want to seem harsh, but I don't care for unqualified rants against a named entity, when the "accuser" doesn't name his own source.
And using vague words like "inappropriate/troublesome" seems a bit mysterious. Were they ISIS propaganda posters, nudity of celebs, or penguins making out? Might make a difference.
And as others have already stated, it's pretty SOP for hosting and domain companies to have this standard in place. Hate to say it, but it's in the User Agreement. Else, run your own servers and domain name registrar (oh, and also be liable for those same posts possibly).
Why we insist on not understanding that DNRs and hosts are, basically, publishers, who have some rights, is beyond me.
Let me guess... this guy is upset because he might have not gotten the email within 24 hours (in 2017... yeah, right). Is he off-the-grid hunting sea lions in the north sea? And if his site is so big, he has no one to help him and no backup staff except... only him?
This same crowd will balk that FB didn't remove that last murder video in 12.3 seconds, but demand that THEIR host or registrar give them 30 days.
Sheesh... internet shenanigans never stop, do they?
I did not "police" a single one of those domains.
Like I said below, I was NOT using namecheap DNS or hosting.
> And using vague words like "inappropriate/troublesome" seems a bit mysterious. Were they ISIS propaganda posters, nudity of celebs, or penguins making out? Might make a difference.
I don't care how much problematic the images were. 24 hours warning for threatening to suspend a domain is ridiculous.
> Let me guess... this guy is upset because he might have not gotten the email within 24 hours (in 2017... yeah, right).
Yes that is reasonable reason to be upset. I thought the email was spam/phishing at first. The email also could have easily have been deleted by spam filters.
The even acknowledged the the site "Yes, we have checked the content of the web-site and based on its not deliberate nature". I have no idea if they really would have suspended within 24 hours, but that is definitely is not how a customer should be treated.
I don't think any important domain should be on such a service, when other equal services will be much less threatening to customers.