Tesla owners sue: “Enhanced Autopilot Features…simply too dangerous to be used” (arstechnica.com) 8 points by nwrk 9y ago ↗ HN
[–] mulletbum 9y ago ↗ Can't Tesla just refund them the cost of the car and be done with it? Why would these plaintiffs receive anything beyond that? [–] slededit 9y ago ↗ Not making a judgement on whether their claims are accurate, but they are arguing Tesla intentionally made false and misleading advertisements.Companies should not be allowed to false advertise with impunity. A mere refund is not sufficient to stop the behavior.
[–] slededit 9y ago ↗ Not making a judgement on whether their claims are accurate, but they are arguing Tesla intentionally made false and misleading advertisements.Companies should not be allowed to false advertise with impunity. A mere refund is not sufficient to stop the behavior.
[–] BenzinNZ 9y ago ↗ Probably would have been better if Tesla branded it "co-pilot". Autopilot while technically correct doesn't function the way people assume it does.
4 comments
[ 1.9 ms ] story [ 22.8 ms ] threadCompanies should not be allowed to false advertise with impunity. A mere refund is not sufficient to stop the behavior.