The article title seems pretty biased to me. This seems to be about the Indian government obtaining biometric identification data from its citizens.
Do readers successfully infer this from the article title, or do they think the matter at hand is some kind of physical invasion? I thought the latter, which is why I think the title is misleading and that this journalist is biased.
I understand the concerns about a government mandating the collection of biometric data, but it's hardly about their "right over their bodies".
3 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 20.1 ms ] threadDo readers successfully infer this from the article title, or do they think the matter at hand is some kind of physical invasion? I thought the latter, which is why I think the title is misleading and that this journalist is biased.
I understand the concerns about a government mandating the collection of biometric data, but it's hardly about their "right over their bodies".