The beginning of this keynote is very unusual, instead of the "pumped up check out our new products"... he's talking about the responsibility of technologists? Guessing Microsoft has some cool AI stuff coming.
My guess is that he's talking about the responsibility of technologists because they are rolling out Windows 10 S, which is a step towards leaving behind Win32, an "unsafe" API that is heavily invested in by their core programmer base.
That and they go on to show technology that can be used ways that could cause privacy concerns.
I should say -- tracking people through video and image recognition in a hospital or in a factory is creepy and awesome at the same time. I can't decide just yet.
I've always been baffled at the 'last piece' cult. That piece is no more important than any other piece of the cake. What's with all the emotional baggage surrounding it?
I found this is a cultural thing, e.g. from my personal experience it is not regarded nearly as important in the Netherlands as it is in the United Kingdom.
I agree with you -- in addition, the person to eat the "last piece" has the courage to consume the piece that is both the least fresh and has most possibly been exposed to pathogens from "other piece" eaters.
"First Piece" folks should get more flak as they've destroyed a baked work of art.
On the contrary; the first-piece person is taking all the risk of the possibility that the cake was poisoned at the factory or store. Kings had "tasters", after all.
My dad frequently eats the last cookie in the box or last piece of cake. He then leaves the container there. It's slightly different than normal "last piece" cult, but really frustrating when you're looking forward to the one piece of cake after you mow the lawn, open the container, and realize there is none left.
It's because the person complaining likely wanted another piece, but now they can't because it's all gone. The "logical" person to blame would be the person who took the last one.
AFAIU, when something bad happens to us, we focus our regret on the smallest/nearest action that could have been undone to change the outcome. So in this case, the bad thing being that you wanted a piece and there are none left--it's natural to blame whomever ate the last piece, because it's easier to imagine an alternate reality where the last piece wasn't eaten, than an alternate reality with some earlier piece not being eaten and everybody subsequently encountering a cake with one additional piece.
Same reason the dude who filmed the Rodney King incident was blamed for the LA Riots. People figured that if he hadn't filmed it, the riots wouldn't have happened.
More like: "Find me the person that stole my lunch from the fridge. The bag was clearly labeled with my name! Come on people, what, are we animals here?!?!"
I think this has great potential in in the ER and in Surgery to ensure the basics are followed and forgetfulness does not allow for obvious mistakes --but at the same time allow for on the spot decisionmaking for the surgeon when things don't go as planned.
However, these immediate policy violations are strange to me. As someone who writes software for a lot of field crews, these kinds of exceptions happen _all the time_ and very often they're for explainable reasons. (the guy's hands were busy, he asked his buddy to move the heavy tool).
I'm sure they're aware of this but you have to work in some kind of tolerance to these kinds of compliance violations, because the ultimate goal is increased safety, not finger-wagging.
I don't think that whoever is using this kind of app is expecting to act on every single "violation". It is just nice and convenient that all of the "violations" are recorded, so that if something goes down, there is a documentation in form of pictures/timestamps to back it all up.
Seems to be a pretty useful technology. As a MSFT stock owner it'll be nice to be able to go back to the video and figure out exactly when Nadella made the bad decision. This sort of monitoring and recording will be utilized with CEOs and executives and such, right?
This is about safety, not about making "bad decisions". Do executives risk their lives and health daily? What about someone working with heavy machinery?
you move in to selective enforcement. there will be recorded violations of something for pretty much everyone, and only a handful of people will have access to it, and they'll selective enforce as they see fit. but maybe if you do this one little favor for them, they'll look the other way (for a spell).
I mean, that kind of selective enforcement is possible right now as well, cameras have been available for quite a while. I don't think that the technology shown today has added anything important for those who want to powertrip in the way you described.
And I bet any real system would accommodate for the exceptions you mention. However, it makes for a very poor presentation. The presentation here is a marketing device, not a product spec.
Sadly, I bet this goes into employee documentation.
Eg. If an employee has a workplace accident, company distances itself / minimizes cost by citing all your workplace safety violations that were conveniently recorded.
More optimistic use would be for re-training, identifying superstar employees. But saving on lawsuit costs is the big dollar win and probably the motivating factor (In my cynical opinion)
WinRT/UWP is a toy application framework able to produce no better than toy apps. That is why any Windows application worth using is not "modern". The real story is that today's Microsoft can no longer execute and create something new on the same quality level as Win32 was in the 90s.
Sandboxing has nothing to do with it. You can sandbox win32 and in fact they do when you submit a legacy desktop app to the store.
Centennial apps aren't really "sandboxed" in the sense that modern apps are - they use the same declarative installer format, but once the app is running it runs as the user with full trust and can party on the user's files and other apps etc. The filesystem and registry virtualization/redirection is for compatibility with the redirection the installer does and helps against accidental damage, but it's not a security feature.
Anyone know of some high-quality (meaning: good reporting, high signal-to-noise ratio), live, textual ("SFW") commentary stream covering the event? (blog? twitter? reddit? some IT news agency?)
In my experience it's better to wait for everything to be digested and released in text format. There's just too much bullshit to cut through. Live events are a world of cringe that I can't handle anymore. Last one I watched was NVIDIA's "Tom" incident, never again. Anandtech did a good job with the live blog, and that event was like 95% bullshit and 5% content.
The technology demonstrated today should have everyone concerned. Satya talked about the responsibilities that we, as technologists have... but the power isn't going to be in OUR hands, it's going to be in the hands of the people who own the technology we build. The world outside of tech needs to see this.
They have however swapped the order of presentation, which might say something about priorities. Previous MSBuilds have all been day 1 Windows, day 2 Azure.
I think that reflects where they see their predominant opportunity. How much "Blue Ocean" is there left for desktop operating systems and applications? Or what use to inhabit the Enterprise data center (Server OSs, Groupware, etc)? You could coast on that more traditional business for some time, but if you're going for real growth opportunities, seems like they've got a pretty good idea where the lies.
I would add that if an Azure strategy works out for them, the "device" wars (be it Win vs. iOS vs. Android or Desktop vs. Mobile) really won't matter if they manage to be at the center of it all.
A theme this year is that the Cloud isn't just "someone else's PC" anymore. A lot of the discussions have been about several ways of running and deploying "cloud"/Azure apps on "the edges", aka user devices and IoT machines. There was the expected emphasis on Azure Stack, the on premises version of Azure. There was the new Azure IoT stack. There were many references to Project Rome (and it's Enterprise name Microsoft Device Graph) for device roaming and contextual knowledge about all of a user's devices.
Some of the implication is that "everything is Cloud" now. Serverless (AWS Lambda/Azure Functions) and "Cloud" container models may increasingly be a way applications are built and deployed, to any device, including end user devices.
Microsoft seems to be positioning that Azure is increasingly a platform for every type of application, from IoT, to on premises Enterprise, to, of course, Cloud, and possibly everything between.
Real-time translation is the type of technology that has practical implementations. I could care less about finding designers on LinkedIn via a voice command. But if I am stuck somewhere in another country and unsure where to go or how to communicate, I guarantee I will be happy to have that translation service available.
Here is an idea for a service: You lease the translation service for the term of your trip for a dollar a day. You can lease on demand for 24 hours for 5 dollars.
I find that MS's translation tends to work slightly better... though Google is imho better in voice recognition. However, I really want to see all IVR systems burn in hell.
"I could care less" is an idiom, it means the same thing as "I couldn't care less". (This may seem somewhat odd, but it's perfectly natural once you know it started out as sarcastic.)
Speech recognition failed 2 times before managing to translate the Chinese speech: the sentence to be translate was (in Chinese) "AI is fantastic". Isn't this ridiculous ?
100 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 115 ms ] threadThat and they go on to show technology that can be used ways that could cause privacy concerns.
Eloquent as always.
Stolen, as always. Never change Microsoft.
http://readwrite.com/2012/05/07/what-data-gravity-means-to-y...
EDIT: Just read your username, you already have a predisposition to Microsoft.
http://highscalability.com/blog/2015/3/25/the-convergence-th...
My flagged comment is still 100% correct: Microsoft "borrowed" this concept.
I assume the people who flagged my original are gonna have the onions to unflag it, right?
"First Piece" folks should get more flak as they've destroyed a baked work of art.
Last beer though...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_heuristic
AFAIU, when something bad happens to us, we focus our regret on the smallest/nearest action that could have been undone to change the outcome. So in this case, the bad thing being that you wanted a piece and there are none left--it's natural to blame whomever ate the last piece, because it's easier to imagine an alternate reality where the last piece wasn't eaten, than an alternate reality with some earlier piece not being eaten and everybody subsequently encountering a cake with one additional piece.
However, these immediate policy violations are strange to me. As someone who writes software for a lot of field crews, these kinds of exceptions happen _all the time_ and very often they're for explainable reasons. (the guy's hands were busy, he asked his buddy to move the heavy tool).
I'm sure they're aware of this but you have to work in some kind of tolerance to these kinds of compliance violations, because the ultimate goal is increased safety, not finger-wagging.
Eg. If an employee has a workplace accident, company distances itself / minimizes cost by citing all your workplace safety violations that were conveniently recorded.
More optimistic use would be for re-training, identifying superstar employees. But saving on lawsuit costs is the big dollar win and probably the motivating factor (In my cynical opinion)
http://www.zdnet.com/article/why-windows-must-die-for-the-th...
Was a pretty interesting read today.
WinRT/UWP is a toy application framework able to produce no better than toy apps. That is why any Windows application worth using is not "modern". The real story is that today's Microsoft can no longer execute and create something new on the same quality level as Win32 was in the 90s.
Sandboxing has nothing to do with it. You can sandbox win32 and in fact they do when you submit a legacy desktop app to the store.
I am so impressed by the device and her reaction. Something so small can give someone just enough sense of control in their lives. It's incredible.
I watched the episode and was blown away!
I would add that if an Azure strategy works out for them, the "device" wars (be it Win vs. iOS vs. Android or Desktop vs. Mobile) really won't matter if they manage to be at the center of it all.
Some of the implication is that "everything is Cloud" now. Serverless (AWS Lambda/Azure Functions) and "Cloud" container models may increasingly be a way applications are built and deployed, to any device, including end user devices.
Microsoft seems to be positioning that Azure is increasingly a platform for every type of application, from IoT, to on premises Enterprise, to, of course, Cloud, and possibly everything between.
Here is an idea for a service: You lease the translation service for the term of your trip for a dollar a day. You can lease on demand for 24 hours for 5 dollars.
Google Translate by Google, Inc. https://appsto.re/us/kT-Ty.i
It's "couldn't care less" [1].
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=om7O0MFkmpw
How ugly can that be?
Can anyone explain what's with this: "you are running ML algorithms in the cloud, and we enable you to run them locally!"
Can't we already run them locally??? Why not run them locally in the first place if speed and low latency is required?