The Conceptual Penis as a Social Construct: A Sokal-Style Hoax on Gender Studies (skeptic.com) 13 points by safek 9y ago ↗ HN
[–] Finnucane 9y ago ↗ I think the joke was on them--the real journal figured they were rubes who could be taken for a few bucks in a vanity publication. [–] [deleted] 9y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] macscam 9y ago ↗ This is funny but dont get cocky because STEM is not immune. Think about abstract design patterns or something [–] Finnucane 9y ago ↗ The fundamental problem--vanity publications that will publish anything for money--persists in all fields these days.
[–] Finnucane 9y ago ↗ The fundamental problem--vanity publications that will publish anything for money--persists in all fields these days.
4 comments
[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 19.3 ms ] thread