Breitbart misrepresents research from 58 scientific papers about global warming (climatefeedback.org) 5 points by roucoulawan 9y ago ↗ HN
[–] sharemywin 9y ago ↗ A majority of reviewers tagged the article as: Cherry-picking, Derogatory, Flawed reasoning, Inaccurate, Misleading.
[–] Finnucane 9y ago ↗ "Breitbart article is bullshit" is pretty much taken as read, but letting the cited authors have a Marshall McCluhan moment ("you know nothing of my work") does hav e its own satisfaction. Too bad it won't be seen by as many people. [–] emvincent 9y ago ↗ 33k social media shares for the Breitbart article, 15.1k for Climate Feedback's debunk + 6k for Snopes' (http://www.snopes.com/scientific-papers-global-warming-myth/), not too bad... [–] Finnucane 9y ago ↗ Are we assuming shares is proportional to total viewing?
[–] emvincent 9y ago ↗ 33k social media shares for the Breitbart article, 15.1k for Climate Feedback's debunk + 6k for Snopes' (http://www.snopes.com/scientific-papers-global-warming-myth/), not too bad... [–] Finnucane 9y ago ↗ Are we assuming shares is proportional to total viewing?
4 comments
[ 2.5 ms ] story [ 17.5 ms ] thread