> Neural networks are useful tools, even comparable to human intuition, but Parkhill and Aspuru-Guzik agree they cannot replace trained chemists. `Chemists [can] make rational choices about molecular structures in the same way a chess grandmaster makes decisions about chess.`
I don't think they have said both phrases as close together as they appeared on the article.
5 comments
[ 2.0 ms ] story [ 19.2 ms ] thread> Neural networks are useful tools, even comparable to human intuition, but Parkhill and Aspuru-Guzik agree they cannot replace trained chemists. `Chemists [can] make rational choices about molecular structures in the same way a chess grandmaster makes decisions about chess.`
I don't think they have said both phrases as close together as they appeared on the article.
probably a bit too late for that thought nowadays
https://www.kaggle.com/c/MerckActivity
It was won by Dahl, Salakhutdinov, Jaitly, Jordan-Squire, and Geoff Hinton using deep learning.
https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/quantum-computer-simulat...