Because they like working there. The few cases that didn't succeeded in making a large stink because of the media echo chamber - the media feeds on controversy.
It says a lot when a person likes to cast the reporting of issues as the biggest problem, and not the actual issues themselves.
When in reality, If certain people at Uber, had of watched how they conducted themselves, instead of acting like they were lords sent from Hubristan, then its safe to say there would not have been legal, nor journalistic interest in such issues.
Really, Who has the cash for a legal fight with any large corporation, let alone Uber?
In Ubers case, add in an alleged toxic employment environment for some employees/staff, and what motivation is there?
Like many other investment vehicles, Uber has truckloads of other peoples money to spend, to protect the investment, and those lawyers are only to happy to help them spend, regardless of the rights or wrongs.
8 comments
[ 6.1 ms ] story [ 33.8 ms ] threadWhen in reality, If certain people at Uber, had of watched how they conducted themselves, instead of acting like they were lords sent from Hubristan, then its safe to say there would not have been legal, nor journalistic interest in such issues.
I mean, should the press only be allowed to do a power point presentation, once, for posterity when a story breaks and then never revisit it?
I'm failing to see what your gripe is here.
In Ubers case, add in an alleged toxic employment environment for some employees/staff, and what motivation is there?
Like many other investment vehicles, Uber has truckloads of other peoples money to spend, to protect the investment, and those lawyers are only to happy to help them spend, regardless of the rights or wrongs.