Is it worth co-founding a startup with great funding but a poor team?
They are certainly friends, but are not the most disciplined or experienced business people. They have a primarily legal background, so I don't think they've worked on a software development project before. And their attitude is 'funding first, business plan after,' which immediately sets off a red flag in my mind. Basically, I question their ability to found and grow a company successfully.
They have access to a few hundred thousand dollars (possibly more down the road) in funding and the support of some 'heavy hitting' business people, including the CMO of one of the major airline ticketing sites on the web. (I am going to leave out the name of the company for their own privacy).
My question is: is it worth jumping on to this project for the networking opportunities, the increased pay, and the obvious freedoms from a 9-5, even though I do not necessarily have faith in the idea or people? Who you know is a lot more valuable than what you know, especially as you get higher up in business, and I would love to be able to incorporate the 'heavy hitters' into my network for future advice or funding for a personal project. At the same time, I am horrified of dealing with a group of people who don't know what they're doing for six months, only to realize that the entire project has been a naive waste of time.
As a note, I am pretty happy with my 9-5 job right now ... it is rewarding and I am paid well (although I would ask for much more to join the startup), but there is no chance of me becoming a 'heavy hitter' there in the next three years or so.
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
10 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 32.6 ms ] threadhaving said that, if you do go for it, make sure to set them straight. you might not need an official business plan, but you do need to at least have a road to profitability written somewhere on a napkin before you get started. it needs to be shown that it can be done. make sure the startup follows a good path and make sure that your investors/partners understand what needs to be done. introduce stability so you can maintain a stable paycheck.
and i think its been said elsewhere on YC, so i'm probably stealing the idea, but being a startup founder doesn't mean that you can expertly produce the startup from start to finish by yourself. it means that you have the knowledge and leadership required to make sure that the task gets completed. if you guys need better coders, hire some freelancers or new employees.
this sounds like a heavily technical project. before jumping in to it, you should assert majority control on the direction of the project. not necessarily ownership or anything, but would you want a team of lawyers with no piloting experience flying a plane? no, the pilot should be at the wheel, making the directional decisions.
such is this project. a developer should be in the lead of building an application. you're the developer, so make sure that they understand that while you'll seriously consider everything everyone says and bow to others in their areas of expertise, the final decisions lie with you because at the end of the day, you're building an application.
that'll probably make you more comfortable :)
If the idea eventually resolves to a more solid plan, I would certainly be committed to it. Thanks for the feedback.
how is this not a win-win.
best case: you take control and make this startup work
worst case: you fail and go back to your old job, richer
If the answer was yes, you never would have asked the question in the first place. You'd already be working.