[–] iandanforth 8y ago ↗ More descriptive title: Making a 3D reconstruction of a very well preserved nodosaur fossil for National Geographic. [–] EllipticCurve 8y ago ↗ Or: Using basic computergraphics to display a nodosaur 3D model [–] mechnesium 8y ago ↗ It was very misleading. I eagerly clicked on the article expecting genetic research... cloning a dinosaur using a common ancestor or something. [–] Zyst 8y ago ↗ Why is this down voted?I was gonna give the article a skip then I thought "What if they actually engineered a dinosaur into existence", felt I had to click it just in case.Instead I got an, albeit interesting, article about 3D. [–] Maken 8y ago ↗ It was the same for me. I was expecting cool biotechnology, found web programming.
[–] mechnesium 8y ago ↗ It was very misleading. I eagerly clicked on the article expecting genetic research... cloning a dinosaur using a common ancestor or something. [–] Zyst 8y ago ↗ Why is this down voted?I was gonna give the article a skip then I thought "What if they actually engineered a dinosaur into existence", felt I had to click it just in case.Instead I got an, albeit interesting, article about 3D. [–] Maken 8y ago ↗ It was the same for me. I was expecting cool biotechnology, found web programming.
[–] Zyst 8y ago ↗ Why is this down voted?I was gonna give the article a skip then I thought "What if they actually engineered a dinosaur into existence", felt I had to click it just in case.Instead I got an, albeit interesting, article about 3D.
[–] Maken 8y ago ↗ It was the same for me. I was expecting cool biotechnology, found web programming.
6 comments
[ 3.8 ms ] story [ 27.0 ms ] threadI was gonna give the article a skip then I thought "What if they actually engineered a dinosaur into existence", felt I had to click it just in case.
Instead I got an, albeit interesting, article about 3D.