Sexist? I saw no sexism in that memo beyond stating the obvious facts followed by a neutered VP response further followed by SJW neutered Google employee "males" on social media stating they stand by their female counter-parts hoping to get a piece.
And it came from a "classical liberal" no less, consider me shocked. I thought Google was entirely castrated, but it seems only the public mouthpiece parts are. Which this new "VP" demonstrated so disgustingly. And seriously, did they have to go so over the top to make sure the diversity VP was a woman as well? Pffh
Not because the ban, but because of this single comment (https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/6shf5j/i_work_a...) I'll retract PART of what I said. Perhaps all is not lost, but I adhered to HN policy where I didn't personally attack any HN user as previously outlined. Still, I am now shadow banned and "dang," perhaps you will be the only person to read this. Perhaps none will. Its a website, we both know accounts are a dime a dozen. I have no desire to try to unwind your idea of what HN is, should, or could be. Hackers ask questions, sometimes and oftentimes without permission of the folks being "hacked". If a community portraying itself as a bastion of speech by this community cannot handle dissenting opinions, however harsh, wrong-footed or verbose they may be. Welp, I'll just say "ok", and we'll see our different ways. You can see the upvotes and downvotes on my comment and you see they leveled at zero. The community is split. Realize that. Cheers and truly, best wishes!
6 comments
[ 4.0 ms ] story [ 27.5 ms ] threadAnd it came from a "classical liberal" no less, consider me shocked. I thought Google was entirely castrated, but it seems only the public mouthpiece parts are. Which this new "VP" demonstrated so disgustingly. And seriously, did they have to go so over the top to make sure the diversity VP was a woman as well? Pffh