QF is no different than other areas of engineering, like programming, where there is some exchange of information about methods between professionals. You can exchange a lot of information without revealing a specific trading strategy. Also there are usually auditors and risk managers that need to understand what is going on in a position and QF provides a language to describe the reasoning behind why a trader has a certain position.
There is actually alot of useful traffic that goes on there. Having said that, the Wilmott forum acts more like mathoverflow than stackoverflow in it's non tolerance for basic questions.
The majority of the questions on that first page of proposals have nothing to do with Quantitative finance. Moderating such a forum would be a nightmare.
Perhaps this indicates a market for a separate "Hokey-pokey finance" StackExchange ...
Having worked in this area and been frustrated by the lack of an online knowledge base, I can assure you this is a terrible idea. Come to find out there is a very good reason there is no info online about tools, methods, and tricks.
Unlike other areas, the quant space is all about secrecy and not helping your competitor, in any way. In fact, I suppose more misinformation would be given then actually helpful advice.
9 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 29.3 ms ] threadThere is actually alot of useful traffic that goes on there. Having said that, the Wilmott forum acts more like mathoverflow than stackoverflow in it's non tolerance for basic questions.
Perhaps this indicates a market for a separate "Hokey-pokey finance" StackExchange ...
Presumably those won't be upvoted on a real site.
Unlike other areas, the quant space is all about secrecy and not helping your competitor, in any way. In fact, I suppose more misinformation would be given then actually helpful advice.