[–] KirinDave 9y ago ↗ We could start holding companies responsible for their products as opposed to suggesting they are blameless even in the face of shoddy software.Right? That'd certainly add economic incentive to quality.
[–] lotsoflumens 9y ago ↗ Still relevant but apparently unknown to the trendy conference speakers and FP ranters:http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~hehner/aPToP/
[–] loup-vaillant 9y ago ↗ > We’ve already figured out a lot about the structure and composition of good softwareI can't satisfy myself with such a teaser. What have we figured out? Pointers, please!
[–] mynegation 9y ago ↗ > perhaps only because we haven’t had a sufficiently dramatic incident of this sort yet.How about Therac 25 and Ariane 5?
4 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 15.8 ms ] threadRight? That'd certainly add economic incentive to quality.
http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~hehner/aPToP/
I can't satisfy myself with such a teaser. What have we figured out? Pointers, please!
How about Therac 25 and Ariane 5?