Not that impressed with it. Perhaps when it leaves Alpha and the content is richer then it would be competitive with Wikipedia but for the time being there is no competition IMO. Not that I like Wikipedia but that is a different story.
It's definitely killing Wikipedia in the area of random text generation. Reading Cpedia is like dropping acid and having William S. Burroughs read you search results.
9 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 21.1 ms ] threadThank you for the link!
http://www.cuil.com/info/blog/2010/04/08/introducing-cpedia-...
It is about as accurate as cuil itself, which means less coherent than timecube.
http://www.cpedia.com/wiki/Javascript/AJAX_&_Javascript
Is this informative? Much less readable?
The only thing Cuil seems to have successfully killed is a large amount of VC money and their reputation.