190 comments

[ 3.8 ms ] story [ 217 ms ] thread
I prefer the version of Hacker News from four months ago to the current version, and all of the viewers listed here, even on mobile. I wouldn't think my opinion would be niche.
What changed four months ago? I didn't notice any change.
Weird stuff like collapsing downvoted comments (and their replies) by default. I even browse with showdead on, so I don't want to have to manually expand comment trees just because slightly more people disagree than agree with the point being made.
You've been reading Hacker News wrong your whole life.
They don't want you to know the secret to reading HN!

On a more serious note, I'm pretty happy with seeing it right here on this very domain. Hell, I haven't even changed the orange header.

The layout and navigation are simple but intuitive. The site is very light and loads quickly. I don't like how voting will make me jump around the page, but I can live with that. No site is perfect for everyone, after all.

Yeah, I think I'll just keep reading it right here.

> voting will make me jump around the page

What do you mean by that? Voting is handled by AJAX requests, so it shouldn't jump around.

Comment, then vote, and it brings me back to my comment.
just use https://news.ycombinator.com - works great on mobile too
I was just about to say the same thing. A few years ago it was a bit annoying to read on mobile, but they eventually made some minor CSS tweaks which made it much better.

Performing certain actions, such as upvoting, require zooming in a lot in order to hit the desired arrow. I'd love to see that improved, but it's hardly a deal-breaker for me.

But that boring web app doesn't even have pretty fonts.

It even has a "next" button, so you can see more than 30 posts, who needs that?

It shows the point count in a smaller greyer font, instead of a big circle, so I can't instinctively choose posts by popularity instead of their headlines.

It doesn't even pull up a random image from the article that might not have anything to do with the actual topic, and display it along with a preview of text, so I can't get distracted and pulled by fundamentally more attractive colorful pictures instead of boring text topics.

It's not written in the newest JavaScript framework, it's just plain old HTML, some simple CSS and Racket making it all run. Racket! That doesn't even have "JS" in its name. What is this, 2013?

Whoever wrote that version clearly doesn't know how Hacker News is meant to be viewed.

ahem

But seriously, the Hacker News site is one of my favorite "news" sites. Simple, clean, no distractions, just headlines.

Also, some of the websites listed in the article are quite useful, like the search engine. Most of the others are simply different ways of reading Hacker News, not "better". Might be better for some people. Not for me.

I like it. The code blocks on mobile are terrible (totally unusable) and the up/down vote buttons could be a bit bigger, but overall it's pretty good.
aannnnd that is about all, which is kind of amazing really.
Good one, first few lines almost gave me a brain aneurysm before realizing what Im reading :-)
It's a very clean and easy to read site. The navigation is logical and visible and the text is easy to read. I'm very happy that is hasn't followed the current horrendous trend of large text, infinite scrolling, and no logical structure. I really dislike the current trend and find it a big leap backwards in usability.
I'll add my voice to this echo-chamber too.

I've tried a few of the alternatives, but I always come back to the main HN site. A lot of the alternative sites are laggy; these either cache their DB fetches or simply only refresh on a schedule.

Right now the only thing I'd change, is move the Search box from the bottom of the page to the top - simply because I always forget it's there.

Actually, thought of a second one - a native RSS feed for the '/newist' page - I currently use the feed provided by HNRSS, but it's not realtime.

I found the normal website really hard to use, and have tried using a bunch of third-party skins and userscripts and stuff to make it look better, but they all seemed even worse in some way.

Then i had a revelation and zoomed in 150%, now i'm perfectly happy with the normal site.

I've used hn.premii.com for years and couldn't be happier. I also like the name, it means 'prizes' in Romanian.
Seconded! Been using it forever, if he'd implement replying and voting I'd have no reason to ever use the vanilla site.
I've used the Hacker News Enhancement Suite for the past few years and thought it did just enough things to make the site a tad more usable without going overboard:

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/hacker-news-enhanc...

I've been making the switch from Chrome to Firefox over the past month, and HNES is the one thing I truly miss that I haven't found a good replacement for.
I use the "Chrome Store Foxified" extension which lets you install some Chrome plugins including HNES.
This ought to be the kind of simple extension that Firefox's ongoing migration to Web Extensions will allow to be plugged in and used.
I'd consider HNES's highlighting of new comments to be nearly essential to reading HN. I don't understand how others can follow long discussions without any indication of what comments have been posted since a previous viewing or refresh. And it doesn't seem to me like it would be a difficult feature to add.
I wish there were a way to display news from a custom time interval, as opposed to always getting news from a fixed interval of time (I think there are three different settings as of now).

If I haven’t visited HN for, say, 6 days, I find it’d be really helpful to be able to display all news from this time period, based on number of upvotes in descending order.

In other words: I’d appreciate complete control over the algorithm that decides which news to display: time interval, minimum upvotes, minimum comment count, upvotes-per-hour, etc.

Ok, so all of those are for reading, but I don't see any that would allow voting and commenting on HN. It's also the case with pretty much all other HN apps/interfaces I've seen (with notable exception of HN Enhancement Suite, which is a browser extension).

I don't understand why that is. Is there some important rule of HN that disallows any third-party interaction except through the official interface? Or do people simply treat viewing HN as a MVP, and give up after making it?

As it is, those tools seem only useful for HN readers / lurkers, not that much for those of us who participate in discussions here.

There is no proper API, IIRC. All those clients scrape the website.
There is (or at least was) an API, AFAIK read-only though. I still don't see why one couldn't combine the API and scrapping to get a full read/write interface going.
Wouldn't that require you to give a random site your login to post on your behalf?
It would. Whether you should is another thing entirely. I'm asking why noone seems to even offer the option?
I can't speak for anyone else, but if it were me, I wouldn't expect anyone to trust me enough to use it, so why bother?
People likely would use it. It's a HN account, not a bank account.
Yes, but they shouldn't.

Even though I have no ill intent and it's just an account on a silly web forum, they shouldn't and it would make me sad if they did.

Some of those are apps. Apps should be fine to use those accounts, as they should not contact anything else than HN and HN's API.

But I guess the only way to be sure is to write one yourself.

MiniHack on iOS let's you post and vote if you login through the app.
Or better: why can't HN developers please work on API? Probably brcause building one takes too much effort.... and they don't see reasons to develop one.
Option #1 hckrnews and some of the other options don't disrupt voting or commenting much at all, they're just a bunch of links to the main Hacker News web site: you have to click through to Hacker News to read the comments, so that's how you upvote and/or comment.

Preventing you from upvoting without actually reading the articles and/or comments is probably a good thing.

I want one with a big hide button for posts/comments and anonymous comments.

I don't need to vote or something, I just want to get rid of uninteresting stuff as fast as easy as possible.

There are anonymous comments?
"anonymous" meaning posting through an alt account.
I would have liked to see widgets and small apps or things instead of just mostly sites. The responsive ones for mobile are nice and I use http://hn.reapp.io myself on my phone.
They didn't even mention haxor-news. This is basically a command-line interface with a lot of features. Maybe there is justifieble objection to the "read Hacker News without the eyestrain"-bit in this case.

[0]: https://github.com/donnemartin/haxor-news

Thank you for posting this. This is, imo, the most important front end to hn. I'm surprised it was left out of the list.
Aren't derivative posts of hacker news derivatives a bit derivative?
I'd like to see some kind of filtering for HN based upon some preferences or, better yet, an ML style system like with Netflix that learns the kinds of stories you're interested in.

I skimmed through the descriptions of the "21 better ways", but didn't see anything that would help you to find the HN articles that you're interested in.

Related: Do you use any native apps on mobile (preferably iOS)?
The most useful HN addon is HN Replies by Dan Grossman. You get an email if someone replies to your comment. Simple UI and real value.

http://www.hnreplies.com/

Fiiiinally! Also, an interesting blast from the past, I used to play a MUD with Dan back in the nineties, he was doing well even back then.
Thank you! I had been looking for a way to get reply notifications for very long.
Thanks, this is great. There has been a lot of vitriol about Disqus but I love how easy it is to follow a conversation on there.
Thanks! That's useful.

Long time ago, there was a similar service that used push notifications (via now-dead Notifo; they also had emails https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1720763 but, personally, I felt that pushes were nicer).

I wonder if there's anything that uses Web Push notifications...

I'm sure the lack of this feature is intentional, to prevent back-and-forth arguments and give others a chance to contribute.

Years ago when I read Slashdot, it felt like the bulk of the discussion was the same few regulars, who would reply within minutes to any response they got. That wasn't healthy or informative, I'd prefer not to see the same here.

do you really need notifications that badly? whats wrong with clicking "threads" (4th link on the top of page) once per day.
Because if an active debate is going on in response to my comment, I'd like to be able to participate. But, I'm not so self-centered as to assume that is likely, so I don't normally check.
and at the same time you are ready to receive live updates while eating dinner/taking nr2/attending funeral. You are conceding control over your time(life) to some third party.
It’s an email. I get to choose when to read it and whether to click the link and respond!
Iv got a feeling most people will use it with push notification to 'stay connected', brrrr
1 vote for HackerWeb for your phone. Wish the full HN had collapsible threads - a feature on Reddit I find very useful for traversing long threads without getting "sucked" into a "reply black hole"
They seem to have added this feature to the main site within the last couple months. It works for me on my iPad anyway, maybe give it another try.
OMG I feel dumb - I didn't notice it! Awesome. For those looking, the "collapse" function is after the "ago" [-]
I find this meta HN site quite entertaining:

http://n-gate.com

I found the about section there very useful since I always wondered what hn was about:

> Hacker News is an echo chamber focusing on computer posturing and self-aggrandizement.

I was going to say the same thing, but we can't both be right.
Does anyone remember the front-end to HN that categorizes posts according to proper topic categories like "Privacy," "Coding," "Startups," etc. with ML?

I remember it being posted or mentioned in a comment but cannot find where it is.

(comment deleted)
(comment deleted)