> Although Google is part of the minority of the C++ community that doesn’t use exceptions, we recognize that it is a minority and believe that code is often better when it’s exception-safe. We’ve done our best to make things exception-safe. However, we won’t contort things to support all possible exceptions — if you have a hash functor or operator== that throws, we may just mark it noexcept instead.
6 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 23.1 ms ] threadLooks at first glance more comprehensive than the Intel TBB.
https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/blob/master/README.md
You can? I looked all over the site, and I couldn't find it (other than going to GitHub and reading the source code).
> Although Google is part of the minority of the C++ community that doesn’t use exceptions, we recognize that it is a minority and believe that code is often better when it’s exception-safe. We’ve done our best to make things exception-safe. However, we won’t contort things to support all possible exceptions — if you have a hash functor or operator== that throws, we may just mark it noexcept instead.