Ask HN: Best options for wearable computing? How can I type and walk?
There is significant proof that staring at screens all day without moving is killing us
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/14/phys-ed-the-men-who-stare-at-screens/?hp
Here are the 3 options I have looked at
1) A full setup like this guy at vassar
http://www.cs.vassar.edu/people/priestdo/wearables/top
- Vuzix Glasses http://www.vuzix.com/iwear/product_presentation.html
- chorded keyboard/twiddler http://handykey.com/
- Expensive - $2000
- Vuzix is low res (800 x 600)
- Have to learn new keying method
2) Picking up a viliv N5 and typing directly on the device with my thumbs http://www.dynamism.com/notebooks/viliv-n5.shtml
- 1024 x 600 screen
- No PixelQ screen
- $650
- Not sure if I will be able to type
3) Sticking with my Nokia n900 with bluetooth headset (or Blackberry)
- Cheap
- Not all software is available but could in theory access via VNC anything I need
- Have to stop occasionally to use but screen works in daylight
Any suggestions?
BTW I need to be billable during time I am walking.
28 comments
[ 2.1 ms ] story [ 70.5 ms ] threadMind you from the article:
"Regular workout sessions do not appear to fully undo the effects of prolonged sitting."
Here is the guy with the world record in typing and running
http://uk.video.yahoo.com/watch/563605/2808706
I think one of the reasons driving/cycling/walking is so productive thinking time is precisely that you are constrained. You can't just waste time, you can't launch into stupid half thought out plans.
Edit: I forgot to mention, the same can be done with babies. When you have a baby, and have to feed it, rock it, clean up after it, change it etc. You're forced to just think about problems. It's excellent thinking time. Babies do come in useful after all!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPjN07JyVjo&NR=1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcE_JHx5_gA
If you are into bulk writing, then I'd pick a twiddler and text to speech rather than a heads-up-display.
"Very fast. Let me explain.
"I work in 2 modes: (A) At the computer and (B) Away from the computer.
"When I'm in Mode A at the computer, I'm cranking out lines of code, testing, revising, testing, revising, etc. This process must be very fast. Several hundred lines of code (or whatever) in less than an hour. A complete cycle in less than a couple of hours. My guideline is that if I'm not working that fast, then I must not be prepared to work that fast, so I don't deserve to be at the computer. I should be in mode (B).
"Mode B is generally much slower. Reviewing code, specs, or notes. Refactoring code. Laying things out with pen and paper. When I have enough work clearly laid out, I know it's time to get back to the computer and return to Mode A."
Also just another point. don't over work yourself, we're all humans (except those damn bots) and you have to give yourself down time to let your brain simmer on the latest and greatest thoughts.
You are way overthinking this. Don't bother with dorky wearable computing gear.
http://jott.com./jott/jott-assistant.html
I don't think he uses it while walking--he tends to stand around in the hallway while using it. I also never found out how easy it is to see the screen in sunlight...
it works pretty well even if you are moving about, since it doesnt depend on accuracy of position.
http://www.soldf.com/images/s_ra180soldat.jpg
http://www.laptopsarena.com/type-on-your-laptop-while-walkin...
But, the Twidler does look cool! Has anyone here used one? I'm not sure about walking around while typing but I can imagine setting in a comfy chair with one.
http://www.alphagrips.com/
Anyway, I would first practice read-only browsing e.g. with Vuzix Tac-Eye LT¹ attached to iPhone (or smartphone of your choice). If that worked, I'd add one-hand bluetooth keyboard, such as FrogPad².
Generally speaking, wearable computers are definitely the future, but the technology is not yet ready for the prime time. Today's virtual glasses are clunky, low-res and expensive; input methods are primitive.
[1]: http://www.vuzix.com/iwear/products_taceye_lt.html [2]: http://www.frogpad.com/
http://mobilecommunitydesign.com/2006/11/writing-while-walki...
I have a twiddler. I'd prefer to not use it when walking, although I prefer a normal keyboard when sitting in front of a computer.
I think that the best interface for working when walking would be speech recognition/spoken word. If I had a screen in my glasses I'd probably walk right into a tree.
Perhaps you could dictate to some kind of voice recognition on a mobile phone?
There are HUDs of various resolutions that can put SVGA, XGA and higher into unobtrusive glasses (or perhaps into safety glasses, given your accident). There's plenty of hardware of every possible form factor to provide processing power and you can run x86 and Windows, or ARM and Linux and use whatever desktop software you're used to.
The issue is that all of our desktop (and even iPhone) hardware and software both is designed to be the focus of our attention. Even walking, you'll end up like people who are texting while driving. You can't do both at the same time, neither safely nor productively.
I got rid of all of my hardware because I came to believe the only way to safely and productively do something like that is without traditional interaction at all. You want a system like Steve Mann's, where data is projected onto the environment: http://www.flickr.com/photos/caseorganic/4521834460/
Longer form information needs to be able to be read to you, and you need to be able to slow down, speed up and repeat that information through the noise of the real world as the real world distracts you: http://hirevito.com/oldportfolio/smartdevice/
You want to be able to respond and act with simple gestures as to not draw attention to yourself, and to dictate longer form information out loud (so long as you don't mind being that rude guy yelling into his Bluetooth headset).
You need all new software to support these paradigms, because your UI is rendered not onto windows and boxes in an opaque, bright display taking up your field of vision, but onto the side of a building, and then another one, and then another one, advancing down the street as you continue to walk, a line or two at any given time.
The hardware to process all of this is out there; the iPhone 3GS can handle augmented reality just fine. But every task you want to accomplish needs new software.
You would probably be better off taking a cab home.