Strange, I thought hospitality workers were H-2B. I was surprise the local McDonald's had foreign workers here on visas. I think there was an article on HN about shortages of workers under those programs (east coast resorts?).
This does nothing. The 'little guys' have gotten scape-goated.
I don't see Infosys, CapGemini, TCS (Tata Consultancy Services), Cognizant, Tech Mahindra or for that matter any of the Top 10 H1B Visa Abusers [1] in this List.
Business as Usual.
It's strikingly similar to the list of countries in the Trump's Muslim Ban wherein countries that sponsored terrorism, but that in which he had business interests in ,were not listed, incl. Saudi Arabia ( 15 of the 19 911 hijackers were Saudi Citizens)
EDIT: Addressing @praneshp's question. Microsoft might be a red herring, but the rest, esp. the Indian Companies like TCS, Infosys, Congnizant are also the TOP 10 Abusers of H1B Visa. Speaking from personal experience here. I've written at length about this on Quora, so don't want to re-hash it. You can read it here => https://www.quora.com/Being-on-H1B-is-it-worth-joining-TCS-i...
Not only do these Indian Companies abuse the H1B Visa program, but they also abuse and underpay the workers they bring on the H1B Program. I've written about this also in my Quora answer linked above.
Asking because I have no clue: You just linked to the top-10 H1B holders, not abusers, no? I see Microsoft on that list, and find it difficult to believe they are abusers.
From what I know from extended family, firms like the ones in the link do things like faking a job/resume, etc. Do the large Indian firms do that as well, in addition to flooding the lottery pool?
Microsoft hires thousands of H1B workers for generic roles like project manager and software developer.
Do you really think there aren’t Americans that could fill those roles? Of course there are but it would cost more. A true shortage would not affect Microsoft at all. They have as much money as anyone.
This is a dirty secret of tech that you can’t discuss without being labeled racist or xenophobic no matter how untrue that is.
> Do you really think there aren’t Americans that could fill those roles?
Would they fill them at a similar level of quality? That is to say, if you forced similar wages on both and removed the cost of bringing someone from overseas into the country, would the employer hire the foreigner? If so, I see the visa programme as fulfilling one of its roles: adding to the American braintrust. If not, you have a point.
Most studies I've seen don't attempt to answer this question, instead devolving to the easier-to-answer if useless "could they have found an American who met the job requirements".
> Would they fill them at a similar level of quality? That is to say, if you forced similar wages on both
Forcing certain wages on American workers is not the way that H1B is intended to work which is basically the point here. H1B is ostensibly intended to allow employers to fulfill roles that cannot be filled at any salary by US workers.
If anything, coders aren't the ones who are under paid in US. Their salary are HIGH.
To be the devil's advocate, the H1B visa is created specifically for the purpose to bring down the cost of employers, by opening up to global talent supply, no matter under what disguise. And software industry seems to me is exactly the sector what H1B is intended to apply on.
And I do think it is misleading to say programmers' salary is not high because of the cost-of-living. Cost-of-living applies on EVERYONE, there are many waiters/drivers/artists living in SF, and I don't believe they get additional rebate because they are not doing computer work.
It's a side-point. If somehow there aren't Americans that could fill generic roles like "Project Manager" then sure, bring in somebody that can. But before doing that you should be doing work to do on the job training, or finding some other way to bring an American into that job. If your company is located here, your executives reside here, and you make use of our government, taxpayer funded infrastructure, university system, etc... then you should be doing what you can to ensure your fellow Americans have access to jobs from your company. If you don't want to do that, that's fine, just move your company out of the country, renounce your citizenship, and relocate your executives and other workers.
I get that there can be trouble filling specialty roles, jobs like data scientists, cancer researchers, university researchers, etc... but project manager? Nope sorry. Analyst? Nope sorry. Those jobs just about anybody off the street could do with the right amount of training, experience, or motivation. And before somebody says "oh but the poor corporation will have to pay or spend time training somebody" yeah that's just too bad.
> Do you really think there aren’t Americans that could fill those roles
The onus is on you (or an authority) to show that that they ignored Americans. I'm sure they could hire a person of any nationality to put a body on the seat, but probably not someone who could solve their whiteboard problems. I'm especially biased about MS because I failed to clear their interview twice.
I downvoted your other comment about Google (that's now dead) because I thought you were making nonsensical claims with zero evidence; I don't think your comments were racist or xenophobic.
Congrats on getting to the interview phase. I've heard horror stories of Microsoft interview process and reluctant to go through their interview meat grinder.
If I remember correctly, the initial phone screen was a joke. They literally just asked me to code fibonacci once, and something similar the other time. All the interviewers themselves were nice to me, etc.
Best interview experience I've ever had. They had me do a quick online thing then come to an event with a bunch of people. No waiting around for weeks between each stage, no multiple phone screens, no waiting for weeks after for a yes/no.
I feel that hard to believe, if anything, I would say foreign workers are more expensive than local talent, in big tech firms they are paid just the same as Americans, but they come with added expenses due to international relocation, visa feeds, etc.
* I might be biased thou, since I work on the US under a work Visa.
I have hired a few H1-Bs, and here is how the first step goes:
Before you file for a H1-B visa with USCIS, employer needs to get Department of Labor (DOL) certification. Employers have to advertise the job in local media for 30 days. Jobs have to offer median salary for the given skill based on DOL numbers (Roughly $104K per year).
All resumes received, and interview notes must be included in DOL application for labor certification. If a qualified American applied for the job, DOL rejects the certification request.
I would love to hear where you see a material flaw in this process. To me it signifies there is a real talent shortage.
This is not really true: the main limiting factor with H1-B visas is the yearly cap; as others have said, the rest of the requirements are normally easy to check off (especially if you already have an H1-B).
Since you are not subject to the H1-B cap when reapplying if you are already on an H1-B, and since there is so much demand for tech jobs, it's not clear that H1-B tech workers have to be loyal to their employer.
Here is the flaw, material or otherwise:
(a) companies post jobs with descriptions that filter out all but the candidate they are filing for DOL certification. Next time, look at your company postings with exacting requirements: 3 yrs of experience in the stack A, 5 years in the language X, 6 years in Y, etc. That's how the game is played.
(b) During green card processing, I have seen companies setting up fake interviews only to disqualify whoever comes for the interview. I was a victim of that.
I have seen pretty much every company be guilty of (a), so it is hard to regulate it away.
(b) seems downright malicious and/or stupid. Why conduct fake interviews if employer is going to pay the same amount? Especially when you future foreign worker won't be able to work for you till next October at the earliest?
(b) is to file I-140 for those who have been already on H1B. If I were an employer, and if I wanna apply for I-140 for one of my employees who is on H1B, I need to do that.
> Employers have to advertise the job in local media for 30 days
So like, newspapers nobody reads? A website you really hope nobody finds? There's a wide variety of strategies to claim you found no applicants. Don't have to take my word for it, consultants at Cohen & Grigsby go in far more detail: https://web.archive.org/web/20150725212924/http://www.ethics...
I have worked at companies in the past that actively rejected all applicants (Americans included) to the job postings, even if they were qualified. These were entry/mid-level PM and software engineering positions.
> Employers have to advertise the job in local media for 30 days.
Are you sure? It's only true if by "local media" you literally mean a piece of paper on a board in the break room.
>All resumes received, and interview notes must be included in DOL application for labor certification.
You are definitely confusing PERM with H1B. PERM (certification for EBGC) requires advertising, interviewing and is, essentially, a process of proving that there are no Citizens or Resident Aliens willing to take the job. For H1B DOL just certifies that the wages you are paying are adequate for the position. Plus there is a requirement to inform your own employees about the H1Bs, which is done by positing these jobs in "local media" (in one company I've seen those posted in a closet, which also contained a soda machine so it had some foot traffic).
I don't think you understand what the word "shortage" means. A shortage logically cannot persist in a free market unless some external factor is artificially constraining supply or restricting prices. There is no supply constraint; unlike physicians or lawyers there is no formal training or certification required for software developers (outside of a few secret or safety-critical positions). And the government hasn't placed any limits on salaries. If there was a true shortage then we would be seeing huge increases in compensation, which obviously isn't happening. Perhaps you're just not willing to pay the market clearing price.
It's often hard to split work between countries effectively (especially in large corporations). A lot of the larger & more impactful projects tend to be done at a home base - for political or logistical reasons.
I don't know which part of Amazon you worked for - but this was totally done in Amazon: We had/have major pieces of kindle, aws, payments et. built out of India. I worked for one of those teams for two years. Amazon is so big that segmenting like this isn't a big deal at all.
I am all for shutting the door on under-qualified engineers being hired just because they will work for much lower wages, But applying the same rule to companies like Amazon / Microsoft etc would just mean work moves to those offices.
Personally I moved here because the team I wanted to work for was here (DynamoDB - given my history building storage engines before). I stayed because of the quality of life / opportunities. I mean if my visa gets revoked, I would sell my house etc here, pick up my money and probably end up in Canada / Europe offices of Snap anyway.
I try not to attach myself to material stuff too much, I'd like to think I can make the best out of wherever I am, improve when I can. But not many (including my family) are like that. They like the security provided by a good immigration policy - means this will only take high paying jobs away from here.
Ha, I'd have to get a golden parachute to work there. Some SJW googler would try to scalp me within 30 minutes of me saying the problem with policing in America is the lack of secret police. And the problem with airport security is that it's reluctant to embrace differential scrutiny.
In addition to technical skills, there are other considerations:
1. Diversity.
2. Cultural fit.
3. Results.
Companies know better what they want/need -- not some loud random strangers on the internet, and definitely not the government/USCIS.
That said, driving down US wages should definitely be punished as it is illegal.
For international companies either they import overseas skilled employees to their headquarters (e.g Microsoft) and/or they open up offices in other countries where those skilled employees can work(e.g Google).
There's a pretty good argument for the US to import those skilled employees rather than export those jobs. But as a non US citizen, I'd be more than happy for H1B workers to be more restricted and have more big tech companies open offices in my country.
> Do you really think there aren’t Americans that could fill those roles? Of course there are but it would cost more.
"Shortage" means that even if you pay insane salaries, you will not get a qualified employee. Thus a thought: make it a requirement for H1B workers that they are paid, say, 3 times what the average of a typical salary for a related job is. This way companies can solve their shortages via H1B, but they will only do it to stop shortages of qualified workers (for an insane price) and not to reduce costs.
By your definition, is it ever possible to have a labor shortage? As long as there's one qualified individual who doesn't already work for you, there should be some "insane salary" that would entice them, no?
> By your definition, is it ever possible to have a labor shortage?
Yes, it is quite possible, though not common. Centrally jobs, where you need highly intelligent people with qualifications that only very few have (and are insanely hard to get) or an insane amount of experience.
Think of people with decades of experience developing chip architectures from ground up (example: Jim Keller).
Think of willing to apply mathematicians of Field-medalist quality to work on your insanely hard problems (example: Microsoft Research (Station Q) applied Michael Freedman to work on the mathematical foundation for topological quantum computers; or it is well-known that Terence Tao also does consulting work for the NSA (source: http://www.smh.com.au/good-weekend/terence-tao-the-mozart-of... )).
Or think of gurus in AI/machine learning of an above-ordinary-human level of competence.
But I am aware of companies that actually do have this kind of problem (not in the extreme of my previous post, where I exaggerated my point somewhat to make it more marked):
They are looking for some kinds of people with some very specific and rare qualifications who are rare and hard to find and if they really do find such people, they of course pay such people really well. In other words: Their problem really is finding such people and not the money.
So in this case there is a shortage of people and not of money.
"Jobs that Americans could fill" is not what people are talking about when they talk about H1B abuse.
H1B abuse is when you do things like pay people the minimum salary as required by law, and THEN set up some illegal contract with the employee that says that if you leave before 2 years, the engineer has to pay back 10s of thousands of dollars.
Or another common thing that happens is that the same company will submit a person multiple times through shell companies, so that the person has an unfair advantage in the lottery.
> THEN set up some illegal contract with the employee that says that if you leave before 2 years, the engineer has to pay back 10s of thousands of dollars
is true, and VERY prevelant with Indian 'Companies' [called 'Bodyshoppers'] that abuse the H1B visa program. Some even hold your passport hostage (which is also VERY ILLEGAL). Again, speaking from personal experience of some of my Indian friends who came here on H1B around the same time as me...
Agreed. There's 100s more. I wish there was an avenue to directly report these body shops. Here's one: http://www.ccsiusa.net/ (Corporate Computer Services, detroit). Even their Glassdoor reviews are fake.
Weren't the countries from the travel ban already identified under the Obama administration as being failed states incapable of verifying documents or nations refusing to do so?
It makes sense that he would do business in nations with functioning government.
Strange move given that all you could do to stop the current abuse is to start prioritizing the applications by salary rather than picking them randomly until the cap is reached.
Startups do not use H1B workers. A startup is actually hiring someone for a role and they can't take the risk that their guy will lose the lottery. Plus, the application is just beyond what most startups are going to have the time to do.
That is not even remotely true. Anyone who can afford a software developer can afford an immigration attorney to handle applying for an H1B.
Plus it usually takes 2-3 years to know if someone isn't going to get the H1B lottery during their OPT which is a longer time horizon than most startups are concerned with anyways.
I think most startups simply hire who they view as the most qualified person regardless of immigration status.
Source: Have a startup that hires software developers.
> That is not even remotely true. Anyone who can afford a software developer can afford an immigration attorney to handle applying for an H1B.
The problem with using sweeping statements like "anyone who can..." is that one example is enough to disprove you. There'll be Who's Hiring thread in a couple of days, watch how many young startups say no new H1Bs on that.
Your OPT case is only true when hiring a student on F1
> The problem with using sweeping statements like "anyone who can..." is that one example is enough to disprove you. There'll be Who's Hiring thread in a couple of days, watch how many young startups say no new H1Bs on that.
(I was confident about this because I was job hunting about a year ago, and was exclusively looking at companies under 50 people. Most of them were fine with H1B transfer, but explicitly said no new applications.)
Not really. Not every one come from fresh H1b. There are tons of H1B transfer cases. If you're interested, pick your favourite startup, go to H1bdata.info, very likely you'll find few cases of h1b hire. Hopefully, may be next time, you'll be more factual.
> A startup is actually hiring someone for a role and they can't take the risk that their guy will lose the lottery.
If they hire someone who already has an H1B working at another company they only have to perform a transfer, which is processed as a lottery-exempt new application i.e. same salary and credential and experience requirements as a new application but no need to go through the lottery. Most startups likely aren't going to hire someone fresh out of school or straight from another country (hence needing a new, lottery H1B). They will prefer someone who is local and has some experience.
> Plus, the application is just beyond what most startups are going to have the time to do.
H1B transfers take 15 days if premium processed, which is an additional fee of ~$1500. That's well within the budget of your average VC-funded startup. The transfer also adds an extra 2 weeks to an H1B candidate's start date over a domestic candidate (because no candidate is going to give 2-week notice at their current job until the transfer is approved) but it's not an insurmountable issue.
It's true that super-early stage startups (< 20 employees) may still not bother with this extra bureaucracy. But there I think it's because at that size the founders' and early employees' professional networks provide a sufficiently healthy pipeline of candidates, so they'd rather keep working and shipping than deal with immigration lawyers. On the other hand if someone on the founding team isn't a citizen/permanent resident, they'd still do it (eg. Laks Srini at Zenefits).
they are already penalized. H1B farms like tata and inforsys just submit thousands of applications knowing most wont make it through the lottery. They are just throwing shit and the wall and seeing what sticks. Startups cant afford to file that many applications and only submit one application for the worker they need and most likely wont get it
I don't see how by only blocking firms will help clean this H1B abuse. The H1B visa abusers and spammers should be screened out before the applications are put into the lottery. Having this process in place, companies like Infosys, TCS etc. can't misuse it as all the 'real' and 'well-deserved' applications are in lottery.
88 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 146 ms ] threadBusiness as usual for H-1B cheaters.
"The Wage and Hour Division maintains the list below of willful violator employers under the H-1B program."
One really odd stand out on the list... Popeyes chicken?!?
Yummi Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Popeye’s Louisiana Kitchen 1310 El Camino Real San Bruno, CA 94066
I don't see Infosys, CapGemini, TCS (Tata Consultancy Services), Cognizant, Tech Mahindra or for that matter any of the Top 10 H1B Visa Abusers [1] in this List.
Business as Usual.
It's strikingly similar to the list of countries in the Trump's Muslim Ban wherein countries that sponsored terrorism, but that in which he had business interests in ,were not listed, incl. Saudi Arabia ( 15 of the 19 911 hijackers were Saudi Citizens)
EDIT: Addressing @praneshp's question. Microsoft might be a red herring, but the rest, esp. the Indian Companies like TCS, Infosys, Congnizant are also the TOP 10 Abusers of H1B Visa. Speaking from personal experience here. I've written at length about this on Quora, so don't want to re-hash it. You can read it here => https://www.quora.com/Being-on-H1B-is-it-worth-joining-TCS-i...
Not only do these Indian Companies abuse the H1B Visa program, but they also abuse and underpay the workers they bring on the H1B Program. I've written about this also in my Quora answer linked above.
[1] Source: https://sc.cnbcfm.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/files/...
From what I know from extended family, firms like the ones in the link do things like faking a job/resume, etc. Do the large Indian firms do that as well, in addition to flooding the lottery pool?
Do you really think there aren’t Americans that could fill those roles? Of course there are but it would cost more. A true shortage would not affect Microsoft at all. They have as much money as anyone.
This is a dirty secret of tech that you can’t discuss without being labeled racist or xenophobic no matter how untrue that is.
Would they fill them at a similar level of quality? That is to say, if you forced similar wages on both and removed the cost of bringing someone from overseas into the country, would the employer hire the foreigner? If so, I see the visa programme as fulfilling one of its roles: adding to the American braintrust. If not, you have a point.
Most studies I've seen don't attempt to answer this question, instead devolving to the easier-to-answer if useless "could they have found an American who met the job requirements".
Forcing certain wages on American workers is not the way that H1B is intended to work which is basically the point here. H1B is ostensibly intended to allow employers to fulfill roles that cannot be filled at any salary by US workers.
To be the devil's advocate, the H1B visa is created specifically for the purpose to bring down the cost of employers, by opening up to global talent supply, no matter under what disguise. And software industry seems to me is exactly the sector what H1B is intended to apply on.
And I do think it is misleading to say programmers' salary is not high because of the cost-of-living. Cost-of-living applies on EVERYONE, there are many waiters/drivers/artists living in SF, and I don't believe they get additional rebate because they are not doing computer work.
I get that there can be trouble filling specialty roles, jobs like data scientists, cancer researchers, university researchers, etc... but project manager? Nope sorry. Analyst? Nope sorry. Those jobs just about anybody off the street could do with the right amount of training, experience, or motivation. And before somebody says "oh but the poor corporation will have to pay or spend time training somebody" yeah that's just too bad.
The onus is on you (or an authority) to show that that they ignored Americans. I'm sure they could hire a person of any nationality to put a body on the seat, but probably not someone who could solve their whiteboard problems. I'm especially biased about MS because I failed to clear their interview twice.
I downvoted your other comment about Google (that's now dead) because I thought you were making nonsensical claims with zero evidence; I don't think your comments were racist or xenophobic.
* I might be biased thou, since I work on the US under a work Visa.
Didn't you realize that. Oh and that guy they dragged out of your office when you arrived was the American you totally replaced.
Before you file for a H1-B visa with USCIS, employer needs to get Department of Labor (DOL) certification. Employers have to advertise the job in local media for 30 days. Jobs have to offer median salary for the given skill based on DOL numbers (Roughly $104K per year).
All resumes received, and interview notes must be included in DOL application for labor certification. If a qualified American applied for the job, DOL rejects the certification request.
I would love to hear where you see a material flaw in this process. To me it signifies there is a real talent shortage.
Since you are not subject to the H1-B cap when reapplying if you are already on an H1-B, and since there is so much demand for tech jobs, it's not clear that H1-B tech workers have to be loyal to their employer.
(b) seems downright malicious and/or stupid. Why conduct fake interviews if employer is going to pay the same amount? Especially when you future foreign worker won't be able to work for you till next October at the earliest?
So like, newspapers nobody reads? A website you really hope nobody finds? There's a wide variety of strategies to claim you found no applicants. Don't have to take my word for it, consultants at Cohen & Grigsby go in far more detail: https://web.archive.org/web/20150725212924/http://www.ethics...
Are you sure? It's only true if by "local media" you literally mean a piece of paper on a board in the break room.
>All resumes received, and interview notes must be included in DOL application for labor certification.
You are definitely confusing PERM with H1B. PERM (certification for EBGC) requires advertising, interviewing and is, essentially, a process of proving that there are no Citizens or Resident Aliens willing to take the job. For H1B DOL just certifies that the wages you are paying are adequate for the position. Plus there is a requirement to inform your own employees about the H1Bs, which is done by positing these jobs in "local media" (in one company I've seen those posted in a closet, which also contained a soda machine so it had some foot traffic).
As for talent, that's basically a myth. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2002/07/22/the-talent-myt...
Speaking from experience at Amazon & Google.
How do you come to claim "especially in large corporations"? I would intuitively rather believe that it is much harder in small companies.
I am all for shutting the door on under-qualified engineers being hired just because they will work for much lower wages, But applying the same rule to companies like Amazon / Microsoft etc would just mean work moves to those offices.
Personally I moved here because the team I wanted to work for was here (DynamoDB - given my history building storage engines before). I stayed because of the quality of life / opportunities. I mean if my visa gets revoked, I would sell my house etc here, pick up my money and probably end up in Canada / Europe offices of Snap anyway.
I try not to attach myself to material stuff too much, I'd like to think I can make the best out of wherever I am, improve when I can. But not many (including my family) are like that. They like the security provided by a good immigration policy - means this will only take high paying jobs away from here.
There's not enough available at the price I want to pay. So sad. The market's clearing but not for me. Pay more or adjust my expectations.
I'd hazard a guess they don't lose most people due to pay issues.
or someone who doesn't want to live in a totalitarian hellhole.
SJWs agree that they hate white cismen's hellholes but they just hate white cismen. SJWs love diverse hellholes.
There's a pretty good argument for the US to import those skilled employees rather than export those jobs. But as a non US citizen, I'd be more than happy for H1B workers to be more restricted and have more big tech companies open offices in my country.
"Shortage" means that even if you pay insane salaries, you will not get a qualified employee. Thus a thought: make it a requirement for H1B workers that they are paid, say, 3 times what the average of a typical salary for a related job is. This way companies can solve their shortages via H1B, but they will only do it to stop shortages of qualified workers (for an insane price) and not to reduce costs.
Yes, it is quite possible, though not common. Centrally jobs, where you need highly intelligent people with qualifications that only very few have (and are insanely hard to get) or an insane amount of experience.
Think of people with decades of experience developing chip architectures from ground up (example: Jim Keller).
Think of willing to apply mathematicians of Field-medalist quality to work on your insanely hard problems (example: Microsoft Research (Station Q) applied Michael Freedman to work on the mathematical foundation for topological quantum computers; or it is well-known that Terence Tao also does consulting work for the NSA (source: http://www.smh.com.au/good-weekend/terence-tao-the-mozart-of... )).
Or think of gurus in AI/machine learning of an above-ordinary-human level of competence.
I can only do Fermi estimates (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_problem ) on this kind of question - which surely many people on HN can do better than me.
But I am aware of companies that actually do have this kind of problem (not in the extreme of my previous post, where I exaggerated my point somewhat to make it more marked):
They are looking for some kinds of people with some very specific and rare qualifications who are rare and hard to find and if they really do find such people, they of course pay such people really well. In other words: Their problem really is finding such people and not the money. So in this case there is a shortage of people and not of money.
H1B abuse is when you do things like pay people the minimum salary as required by law, and THEN set up some illegal contract with the employee that says that if you leave before 2 years, the engineer has to pay back 10s of thousands of dollars.
Or another common thing that happens is that the same company will submit a person multiple times through shell companies, so that the person has an unfair advantage in the lottery.
> THEN set up some illegal contract with the employee that says that if you leave before 2 years, the engineer has to pay back 10s of thousands of dollars
is true, and VERY prevelant with Indian 'Companies' [called 'Bodyshoppers'] that abuse the H1B visa program. Some even hold your passport hostage (which is also VERY ILLEGAL). Again, speaking from personal experience of some of my Indian friends who came here on H1B around the same time as me...
That shouldn't be cheap.
That's not a list of abusers, it's just a list of companies getting the visas.
Still informative, since you can see that Deloitte and Microsoft have a pretty massive gap in salaries over the rest.
It makes sense that he would do business in nations with functioning government.
Plus it usually takes 2-3 years to know if someone isn't going to get the H1B lottery during their OPT which is a longer time horizon than most startups are concerned with anyways.
I think most startups simply hire who they view as the most qualified person regardless of immigration status.
Source: Have a startup that hires software developers.
The problem with using sweeping statements like "anyone who can..." is that one example is enough to disprove you. There'll be Who's Hiring thread in a couple of days, watch how many young startups say no new H1Bs on that.
Your OPT case is only true when hiring a student on F1
We don't have to wait - we can look at the one from last month: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15384262
I did a Ctrl+F and nothing came up for "H1B" and the only thing that came up for "citizen" was a job posting for the US government itself.
Edit: I had to get to page3, but: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15391862
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15386201
(Though I believe the second one is some team specific thing, I know that at least AWS sponsor H1Bs for fresh grads).
Then on p5: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15384311
(I was confident about this because I was job hunting about a year ago, and was exclusively looking at companies under 50 people. Most of them were fine with H1B transfer, but explicitly said no new applications.)
If they hire someone who already has an H1B working at another company they only have to perform a transfer, which is processed as a lottery-exempt new application i.e. same salary and credential and experience requirements as a new application but no need to go through the lottery. Most startups likely aren't going to hire someone fresh out of school or straight from another country (hence needing a new, lottery H1B). They will prefer someone who is local and has some experience.
> Plus, the application is just beyond what most startups are going to have the time to do.
H1B transfers take 15 days if premium processed, which is an additional fee of ~$1500. That's well within the budget of your average VC-funded startup. The transfer also adds an extra 2 weeks to an H1B candidate's start date over a domestic candidate (because no candidate is going to give 2-week notice at their current job until the transfer is approved) but it's not an insurmountable issue.
It's true that super-early stage startups (< 20 employees) may still not bother with this extra bureaucracy. But there I think it's because at that size the founders' and early employees' professional networks provide a sufficiently healthy pipeline of candidates, so they'd rather keep working and shipping than deal with immigration lawyers. On the other hand if someone on the founding team isn't a citizen/permanent resident, they'd still do it (eg. Laks Srini at Zenefits).
The startup doesn't need to file the H1B themselves. The employee can transfer it from another company.
Or if you really want, the government could just turn it into an auction, and reap the money earned from it.