[–] cdancette 8y ago ↗ This is cool, but why is there a huge blank disk in the scene ? Couldn't it be made transparent? [–] royjacobs 8y ago ↗ That's the light source, I suppose. [–] tudorw 8y ago ↗ yes, if you place it 'behind' you, the cubes are nicely lit. This is lovely, if you have a decent GPU it flies along ! [–] shiven 8y ago ↗ Flies on an iPhone 6S! [–] [deleted] 8y ago ↗ (comment deleted) [–] ocfnash 8y ago ↗ I think that disc-ish object is the light source, which I suppose is rendered to make it clear why one side of a polygon is dark while the other is bright etc.
[–] royjacobs 8y ago ↗ That's the light source, I suppose. [–] tudorw 8y ago ↗ yes, if you place it 'behind' you, the cubes are nicely lit. This is lovely, if you have a decent GPU it flies along ! [–] shiven 8y ago ↗ Flies on an iPhone 6S!
[–] tudorw 8y ago ↗ yes, if you place it 'behind' you, the cubes are nicely lit. This is lovely, if you have a decent GPU it flies along ! [–] shiven 8y ago ↗ Flies on an iPhone 6S!
[–] ocfnash 8y ago ↗ I think that disc-ish object is the light source, which I suppose is rendered to make it clear why one side of a polygon is dark while the other is bright etc.
[–] cfontes 8y ago ↗ Make it a screensaver! [–] 52-6F-62 8y ago ↗ Yes, please [–] actionscripted 8y ago ↗ I have no idea how well it would run or what the process for this might be. Could you use a web view to get a sort-of-working version built quickly?Edit: in my old days I would just convert the JS to ActionScript and drop it into Flash to generate an SWF for use as a screensaver. :)
[–] actionscripted 8y ago ↗ I have no idea how well it would run or what the process for this might be. Could you use a web view to get a sort-of-working version built quickly?Edit: in my old days I would just convert the JS to ActionScript and drop it into Flash to generate an SWF for use as a screensaver. :)
[–] bobajeff 8y ago ↗ This is cool it runs very well on my phone. [–] cr0sh 8y ago ↗ Amazingly it runs really well on a standard MBP with Intel graphics (under Chrome 62); though if you choose "insane" mode it chokes hard.
[–] cr0sh 8y ago ↗ Amazingly it runs really well on a standard MBP with Intel graphics (under Chrome 62); though if you choose "insane" mode it chokes hard.
[–] AdmiralAsshat 8y ago ↗ Looks like if I click to pause, rotate the camera, then resume, the camera jumps back to where it was when I paused.It would be cool if it could resume the animation state at the camera's current position.
14 comments
[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 39.9 ms ] threadEdit: in my old days I would just convert the JS to ActionScript and drop it into Flash to generate an SWF for use as a screensaver. :)
It would be cool if it could resume the animation state at the camera's current position.