Ask HN: Would you switch to Win 10 from OS X on a MacBook Pro?
I feel like Apple's QA recently is really bad. Several bad bugs. I'm still plagued by "Month 13 out of bounds" and many of my apps won't run currently.
Microsoft has seemed to make a log of improvements over the years and perhaps it is time for me to return to Windows. With Windows services for Linux, I am at home in a terminal. My other needs are c++, markdown, etc. I could still keep a small OSX partition for Final Cut Pro and some very Mac specific tasks I still have.
Has anyone considered this? Am I foolish for running Windows 10 on my MacBook Pro? Should I just wipe and downgrade back to 10.13 before I had problems and wait to see if Apple gets better?
19 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 37.5 ms ] threadBoth Mac & Windows have their pros and cons. My wife uses Windows 10 for Adobe Premiere Pro but she really wants to get her hands on a Mac OS (iMac) for further design purposes, as both systems do come with their own benefits for videography & graphic design.
May as well go back to what you know works for you.
And if you can partition for use in both, why not? :)
I just suggest both because they do have their benefits.
I have almost fully switched to nix and have had 0 issues. It is a but harder to find applications, but that is the mix when you are running non-commercial software... And if you really need that one application that only runs on Windows... Ask yourself why you have to use it... You probably don't and there is a terminal application that works better on *nix
I made the mistake of upgrading my laptop with it. Calculator takes around 5 sec to load, purely due to phone-home BS.
edit: I've had the best luck with Debian, then segregating all of the Windows stuff into a VirtualBox VM. Tried KVM. It ran well enough, but I could never get the clipboard to work between guest and host.
RedHat/CentOS are also fairly nice on real hardware, but they seem to be even more conservative than Debian on what they put into the distro and the package manager. That and with the popularity of Ubuntu, just about everyone has a .deb package or even an apt repo for their software. Debian uses the same format.
But I mostly do software development using all of the old, old command line tools, so stability is my priority. With different priorities, one of the other distros may be better.
I recently switched from OSX to W10 and after a week it was just all the same.
If I wasn't doing dev for Linux targets, the move wouldn't be as painful as it is. WSL absolutely does not get the job done, and it messes with things you create in a way that you can't really use it for deployment stuff as you'll always be doing fixing after you move stuff from WSL -> target.
My solution? run a full Linux VM.
I'd run Linux natively if it weren't for a customer who won't allow Linux clients to connect to their VPN.
At the moment, macOS still is the only operating system that provides that alongside with a consistent, usable UI and an overall decent user experience.
Perhaps give Fedora or Ubuntu a try (just two off the top of my head, not looking for a distro fight).
Let me ask, how is the hardware support on a MBP, say the latest Ubuntu? I like to be able to close my lid, toss my laptop in a bag and go. They open the lid and continue. Linux distros I tried to use as my main OS years ago never let this happen. Any other hardware support that is lacking? Touch pad, I have a Magic Trackpad 2 also, wireless, etc should be supported I would think.
Apart from those tools I'm really not a fan of metro and generally how Windows is laid out; everything feels pretty clunky while macOS feels smooth (though I'm definitely biased having used a mac for the last 4 years). I love the macOS window management and gestures, so there'd definitely have to an equivalent for those for me to move over. They all may well exist at the minute; I've not done any research for ages.