It's worse than that, it proves that short-term money drives Oracle. What kind of effect do they think this behavior will have on long-term Java vs. .NET/CLR platform adoption?
I was worried when Oracle acquired Sun, but I never thought I'd see them clamp down on Java to the extent that .NET is a significantly more open platform. But there it is.
Well, I think I am wrong on my initial gut reaction, kindly pointed out by wmf. This would be like Microsoft suing RedHat for creating a non-compatible C#-like language and virtual machine.
This has nothing to do with the JCP or Harmony. Sun's long-standing policy has been to grant Java licenses to compatible implementations, which Dalvik certainly is not. Also, Sun was only willing to grant free licenses to open-source non-mobile VMs, which again Dalvik is not eligible for.
13 comments
[ 2.5 ms ] story [ 42.2 ms ] threadThis may mean that JCP is dead, harmony is doomed and it must be pretty scary for companies heavily invested in Java.
http://www.microsoft.com/interop/cp/default.mspx
I was worried when Oracle acquired Sun, but I never thought I'd see them clamp down on Java to the extent that .NET is a significantly more open platform. But there it is.
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=dyQGAAAAEBAJ, http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=G1YGAAAAEBAJ&dq=6... - Does Dalvik even use the Java security model?
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=5GMZAAAAEBAJ - related to the dex file format
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=U-4UAAAAEBAJ
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=mEwEAAAAEBAJ