I appreciate people posting novel scientific findings on HN. This isn’t that: this is a typically overblown press release from a uni press office. I’m not sure such explicit marketing material masquerading as a science article is a value-add here.
As a scientist in a related field, I totally disagree. I feel this is a very balanced article. From my own experience being interviewed by popular press (and in some cases, with my work being overblown to my dismay), I particularly appreciate how Prof Vamivakas was cautious to say that applications are "down the road."
This is a press release, to be sure, but not overblown. This is legitimately an interesting result.
(Full disclosure: I am in no way connected to this work.)
It's still a clickbait headline, no matter how interesting it otherwise is. "Negative mass" and "negative effective mass" change the implications quite a lot. One potentially means wormholes, warp drives, quantum gravity, faster than light travel, and time travel. The other does not.
Yes, but "negative mass " evokes the idea of non-Baryonic exotic matter. It's a nontrivial difference since exotic matter has applications for things like Alcubierre drives.
15 comments
[ 0.21 ms ] story [ 48.0 ms ] threadhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15885404
Sounds like polaritons and excitons are part of the same area of study, that a number of groups are looking at right now.
This is a press release, to be sure, but not overblown. This is legitimately an interesting result.
(Full disclosure: I am in no way connected to this work.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_mass_(solid-state_ph...
Is there hope that this could be the future of semiconductors as a replacement for NMOS?