40 comments

[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 94.9 ms ] thread
I see Matt Ridley referenced. The Red Queen by him is one of the most enlightening books I've read. I highly recommend it.
>The Dunedin Study, which began as a study of childhood development, has become one of humanity’s richest treasure troves of data on what makes us who we are.

Maybe I'm quaint and silly but this kind of overhyped byline makes me doubt that there will be any kind of insight here which thousands of years of recorded human thought hasn't already captured.

Thanks for the insightful comment. Let's just not bother doing research any more and just go with our hunches from now on.
I am kinda new to hackerrank and I don't know what it means when a comment is grayed out (it doesn't sound like a good thing), but I totally agree with you. I read the first part of the article and I just couldn't read further. It's like the article is about how great of an accomplishment that study is, instead of the data that supposedly came out of it.
It means it was heavily downvoted. Others don't agree with us. That's okay though. At least I'm not alone!
It means this comment was heavily downvoted.

In this case the comment was originally at least five times longer than it currently is so many of the reasons for the downvoting are no longer apparent.

> I am kinda new to hackerrank and I don't know what it means when a comment is grayed out (it doesn't sound like a good thing)

This is hackernews, not hackerrank, and when a comment is grayed out it means more than a few people have downvoted it.

https://www.hackerrank.com/

Whoa I didn't think I'd see Dunedin on the front page. If you're ever in town the Early Settlers / Toitu museum had a good exhibition on this study the last time I was in there.
Twice! Higher up is an article on the Beverly Clock.
When I hear Dunedin can't help but think of the Dunedain [1], who had a lifespan three times a regular one.

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%BAnedain

Before I clicked on the article I just assumed that the name was a reference to Tolkien since it was studying aging!
Also what I did. It's really the only logical assumption!
Not only did they live much longer, they didn't suffer the effects of aging until nearly the end of their life.

I don't believe in any supernatural phenomena, the afterlife, or fate etc., but I find his concept of the Gift of Men to be a fascinating look at death.

See: http://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/Gift_of_Men

http://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/Immortality

I found that too. I read these as a child, and I remember siding with those elves who thought Illuvatars Gift to Men to be a hard one to accept. Still, I tried to understand it a gift and not a curse, at last in later years, thinking that there must be something to it, when some elves chose to become mortal and receive this gift.

When I thought of the elves perspective, I can see that while they are super cool, they can't live the lives the way we of mankind do. We have the ability to appreciate life and feel life very intensely, precisely because we know with certainty an upper bound to our expiration date.

(For full disclosure I lean more towards the afterlife being a reality than not, this has of course affected how I read Tolkien, and C.S. Lewis, for that matter...)

> A New Zealand City the Size of Berkeley, CA

Population of around 120,000 for people like me who found that less than informative.

0.04 Wales, in standard units.

on an area of how many square-bananas?
The area of Dunedin has changed over time due to various political changes, we got rid of counties, it's now ~3300 sq km (don't know what that is in bananas, they don't grow here) - that's about 80 times the size of Berkeley (somewhere else I have lived). The population hasn't changed much.

However area is irrelevant since they chose everyone in the original city who was born during that period, the identity of the people they are studying hasn't changed

Remember when these guys were starting the software for this study, they were using cards.

Highlights:

Nature through nuture: "The larger suggestion is that it is the combination of the right environment and genetic cocktail that causes mental illness — not nature versus nurture, but, as author Matt Ridley has written, nature via nurture."

Crime: "The more common antisocial behavior, limited to peer relationships at a young age, she termed “adolescent-limited.” She also identified a less common “life-course persistent” antisocial behavior, which resulted in a persistence of violence into midlife. "

Weed: " unlike tobacco users, marijuana users tended to stay healthy into midlife."

Self control: ""boys and girls with less self-control had worse health, less wealth, and more crime as adults than those with more self-control at every level of the distribution of self-control.”Another related study suggested a 5-item questionnaire at doctors’ offices could identify children who needed motivational counseling to make healthy decisions, which would greatly increase their chances of better health later in life."

You left out the other stuff about marijuana: lower IQ and higher risk of psychosis.
You in turn left out the important note on that:

> these effects only occurred among those who smoked marijuana daily; more infrequent users suffered essentially none of these effects.

Congratulations, you both just tried to skew what was actually said.
Lower IQ and risk of psychosis if used daily.

As an anecdote, I noticed this in three of my friends who smoked daily for years (2-4 years), out of four friends who did and I didn't notice this at all in friends who smoked occasionally (out of... many friends).

Does it matter at what age you start smoking? What are the effects on ppl who start smoking daily in their mid thirties.
I missed this giant takeaway: mental illness: 1."Researchers were shocked to find that the prevalence of anxiety, depression, and substance abuse in the Dunedin birth cohort was more than twice the rate the mental health community predicted. The reason, Dunedin researchers discovered, was a chronic underreporting of these problems by subjects long after their struggles occurred, in the way most previous studies had been conducted.:

2. "method of cognitive testing and digital imaging of the brain through the retina. Using this “non-invasive window to the brain” to identify at-risk children for targeted treatment might decrease a child’s risk of debilitating mental illness later in life."

There is an interesting documentary series about the study, called "Predict My Future - The Science Of Us".
A comment aside: I just hate, that roughly 20% of the screen on top is taken by the header bar, and that there is constantly a “Open in App” icon on the bottom floating around. That’s really not a nice reading experience on a mobile device
What were the largest takeaways? Overall seemed kind of meh.
Someone already commented with the largest takeaways.

However, I ultimately think the biggest takeaway from this study is that it will provide data for researchers in multiple fields for years to come, and will encourage cross-disciplinary study. And, because it worked so well, because there was a high retention of participants, further studies of its kind can be modeled from it, which will give us an even greater perspective on the course of a human life and the events which shape us.

a population studied since birth for 45 years, with data being continually collected allowing future study, and because they don't present that as some easily consumable sound bites it rates a 'meh'?
The study is ongoing, so it's not clear what the largest takeaways will be yet.
Really neat article. In the US though we'd fly a "don't tread on me" flag and say you crazy scientists ain't gettin' my baby's data.
(comment deleted)