467 comments

[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 256 ms ] thread
RIP one of the greatest physicists in human history
Wow, that really sucks.
Dost thou love hawking? Thou hast hawks will soar

Above the morning lark.

– Shakespeare

Very sad news for the physic and science community in general his book A brief history of time made me understand black holes.
Do we know what killed him? All of these articles have very little information. Was it the natural progression of ALS or some other kind of disease?
Like black holes, very little information ever escapes death.
At 76, I think it's fair to say he just died.

I actually had no idea he was that old. Maybe he looked younger than he was because he had no wrinkles.

Yes, and given his adulthood-long health problems, it's a bit of a miracle he lived as long as he did. Amazing man.
Nobody "just dies". Most "natural deaths" are still heart failure. The rest are other kinds of organ failure.

For a lot of people that die natural deaths they could have lived longer if they had kept fit. It just gets really hard to either do or justify when everything hurts and gets harder to do year over year. Or when you are confined to a wheelchair since your early 20s, were told you would only live two years, and then beat that prognosis 27 times over.

But if you are able, even small amounts of cardio exercise could dramatically extend your health and lifespans in old age.

It's true that an autopsy will show a cause of death for anyone. In that sense, you don't "just die".

But after a certain point, that cause of death starts looking pretty meaningless. Everything is failing at once; if you hadn't died of your actual cause of death, you would have died shortly afterwards from another one. In that sense, you do "just die" of old age.

In the UK, old age isn't a legal cause of death for people under 80.
It's called being colloquial, jeez
I'm sure we'll find out more in due course. Right now, it's 4am and all we have is a statement from the family. I'm sure they have much better things to be doing right now.

That said, his original prognosis was that he wouldn't reach his 25th birthday, so he hasn't really done too bad.

In ALS and other degenerative neuromuscular disorders one loses the ability to swallow effectively and protect against aspiration along with the inability to speak. People affected by this, like my grandfather, will usually require a feeding tube to allow enough calories without risking aspiration. However, even with this, we are constantly relying on our epligottis and swallowing reflexes to prevent microaspirations of saliva and oral bacteria. Because of this, people with ALS are at extremely high risk for pneumonia, which would be my first guess as being most likely. His was lucky in that his ALS was a subtype that didn't progress as rapidly as most do.

I think you don't deserve the downvoting you are getting even though the timing of your question is not great, you're still trying to understand what the natural progression of ALS is.

He was an amazing inspiration to me and I am sure many others. I raise a glass tonight to a very special human being.
Thank you for everything
He was a living triumph. Lived and achieved beyond what his body would allow.
What a beautiful mind. He played a big role in who I am today - I majored in Physics and later in engineering because of his book. He inspired me to understand science and use it to improve the world.
RIP to one of the great. Not only he was one of the genius minds of our time, but he also was an important symbol of perseverance for all of us.
A great loss for humanity.

Is this the fastest upvoted HN thread? I don't think I've ever seen a discussion go up to +200 upvotes in under 10 minutes.

(comment deleted)
This reads like a pre-prepared obituary. No additional information regarding his death.
Pre-prepared is exactly how most obituaries are written. Newspapers keep such pre-prepared obituaries of famous people on-hand so that they can publish them instantly if that person happens to die.

Any newspapers who don't do this will lose the all-important race for publication to newspapers that do.

And in celebrating someone’s life, the specific details of their death aren’t so important anyways.
And because obituaries are pre-prepared, they're sometimes mistakenly pre-published.
On at least one occasion that I can recall, an obituary for Steve Jobs was published prematurely. As you can imagine, this caused a minor panic before retraction.
(comment deleted)
From that obituary, this line resonates:

Those who live in the shadow of death are often those who live most.

That quote resonates a lot with me.

My lowest points are when life becomes too easy. When I start to miss the point of living.

I quit my job and moved to a new country because I was becoming complacent, repeating the same thing every day.

It's the moments closest to death when we are truely alive. Whether it's being struck by a disease, as Stephen Hawking tragically was all those many years ago, or climbing a mountain (and in my cause, getting stuck).

If you don't mind sharing, how are you right now?
At least humanity will buy and read more Stephen Hawking books from now on. We must feel more special only by sharing the our timeline with this brilliant mind. More great discoveries and light will be in the future, we will exist to provide proof of the visionaries.
Wow, I was not prepared for this. Rest in peace.
Stephen Hawking defined an entire generation. Say what you will but he created a culture far beyond that of just a physicist. He was both parodied and revered.
There aren't that many humans that have made such a dent in the world as Stephen Hawking.

He will not be forgotten.

Rest in peace.

Few have accomplished as much while overcoming so little compared to Hawkings. Hawkings is and will always be a hero.

To think when he started out black holes were just a myth. He got to witness not only their acceptance and his own vindication but actual gravitational waves as well!

His work will be built upon to make the next greatest discovery, but I don't think there will be a man this accomplished in the next few decades.

We miss you already, Mr. Hawking.

>but I don't think there will be a man this accomplished in the next few decades.

Somehow reminded about that New Generation episode with Newton, Einstein and Hawking.

>> Few have accomplished as much while overcoming so little

It's weird; I individually understood both achievements but never thought about their combination that seriously until it was worded like this. Very well put.

Shouldn't it be "while overcoming so much"?
I think the intent was to say that few people have accomplished as much as he has, and they have overcome little compared to him.
On Pi Day, no less. RIP.
England doesn't have Pi day (assuming he died on the 14th with isn't clear yet)
Much more significantly, it's Einstein's birthday.
Nature couldn't have chosen a better day to honour both.