> Are tariffs Trump's way of making up revenues for his tax cuts?
If they are, that's a stupid idea; tariff revene may make up for the revenue lost in regular taxes due to the tariffs themselves, but there is no level of tariff that is going to meaningfully offset the Trump tax cuts, and trying would just kill the economy.
Calling them a stupid idea that "would just kill the economy" is a rather unsophisticated way of looking at it. But I don't know, maybe you have a well researched opinion and are knowledgeable on this topic. We shall see !
More like protect blue collar factory workers who voted for him for his very reason. These same people used to be the democratic base a few decades ago.
They are Trump's way of not having every industry hollowed out so we are only a nation of consumers. What country survives (or is stupid enough to) give up its IP on a monumental scale and survive?
I've seen many economics101 arguments against these tariffs but I actually am cautiously in agreement with them. These are similar to sanctions and China has been gaming the market in it's own favor in various ways for a long time. Hopefully a longer term solution will see both countries making concessions and hopefully come to a political and economic agreement.
14 comments
[ 2.5 ms ] story [ 42.4 ms ] threadIf they are, that's a stupid idea; tariff revene may make up for the revenue lost in regular taxes due to the tariffs themselves, but there is no level of tariff that is going to meaningfully offset the Trump tax cuts, and trying would just kill the economy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariffs_in_United_States_histo...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infant_industry_argument
And...so?
Presumably, historical US was not implementing tariffs with this reason in mind.
What does that mean? Which IP are you talking about?