In Win2000 you could read from and write to memory of any app [1]. Which we did for minesweeper. By setting proper values and forcing the window to repaint we implemented a simple snake game. The body of the snake consisted of bombs and "fruit" you had to eat were flags. I don't remember how we captured keyboard input though.
There were GameHack and ArtMoney, they allow you to track memory address for specific value in game (gold, money, scores...) by input the value before and after changing it, and then allow to change the value at that address.
We as a community should be pushing back hard against open source developers who want to monetize their work with malware. There are better ways for them to make money from their work than something that's ethically dubious at best.
I once wrote a tool like that but for gnu+linux. You first have to retrieve the memory mapping of the targeted process by reading /proc/<PID>/maps [1] then use process_vm_read/write[2]
I always thought Minesweeper would compute the minefield dynamically as you played instead of generating a fixed map of the minefield at the beginning of the game.
There’s the possibility of painting yourself into a corner (generating an inconsistent board) if you do it on the fly. It could be done, but it’s probably just simpler to generate it at the outset and then do lookups.
edit: unless you just meant that the adjacency numbers could be generated on the fly, in which case painting yourself into a corner isn’t a concern
There is one place where it's dynamic, which is that if your very first click is on a mine, then it'll relocate it to the upper-left corner (or the next available spot).
I once wrote a “clone”[1] and when someone here pointed out the “first click is safe” feature, I implemented it by putting the reshuffle inside a while. Never thought of the first click as being “pre game”...
The fact that it doesn't can be exploited by running it in a virtual machine and using the snapshot feature to go back in time. That's how we made this Website is Down video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SNxaJlicEU
On Windows XP we still had xyzzy[1]. I had so much fun that time in school, claiming that I had psychic powers of seeing through the minesweeper table... ;)
23 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 63.0 ms ] thread[0] http://www.ollydbg.de/
[1] If your app had admin rights IIRC
There is a link on the download page to a zip of the files, without an installer (or the installCore adware/bundleware).
>"For those that want to have Cheat engine without automated installer and installCore recommendation during installation, click here"
We as a community should be pushing back hard against open source developers who want to monetize their work with malware. There are better ways for them to make money from their work than something that's ethically dubious at best.
[1] http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/proc.5.html
[2] http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/process_vm_readv.2.html
only if it's a different user. you can read/write to your own processes without admin
edit: unless you just meant that the adjacency numbers could be generated on the fly, in which case painting yourself into a corner isn’t a concern
I once wrote a “clone”[1] and when someone here pointed out the “first click is safe” feature, I implemented it by putting the reshuffle inside a while. Never thought of the first click as being “pre game”...
[1] https://www.ronilan.com/bugsweeper/
https://guangcongluo.com/dminer/
is a version I wrote while trying to teach myself React.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xyzzy_(computing)#Other_comput...
edit: The article links the original WinXP binary, and the cheat still works, even with wine ( https://www.winehq.org/ ) ;)
It's just weird. https://www.instagram.com/p/BeuHAcogZKS/