Ask HN: Do you have the courage to abandon your high paying job?

147 points by tsetse ↗ HN
I'm in my early 40s and live in a rental condo with my family in a West Coast city. I have a high paying job in one of the FANG companies, making close to 500K/year. At the same time, I have a decent amount of savings (600K 401k and 1.1M in cash in my bank account from a property sale).

The only problem is that I can't really stand my job. I had prestigious positions in other major companies but I pretty much hated them all.

Yes, I should be thankful to have a gig at a major tech company. But just because I'm okay at what I do and was able to profit from my skills, it doesn't mean that I like it...

I'm considering moving to a cheaper area of the country (also due to family reasons) to start my own company. I'm not ready to share what I'll do, but just for the sake of my question, it will be something I love with a risk profile similar to creating a mobile game company - high chance of failure, average to low chance of making some money and low, but not zero, chance of making a lot of money. I'm decent at this particular activity, but not world class (yet)! This company will need at least 2-3 years before actually having a chance to make good money. Due to my savings, I can wait this much and then some.

The reason I'm writing this is because I'm panicking at the prospect of throwing away my high income, high stress, low happiness career for a risky enterprise that will likely not work out. I'm particularly concerned about having to come back to the job market if my company fails, likely working on an even worse job outside the major tech centers (the bright side is that if the company fails, given its small costs, I'll still have ~500K in bank)

My question is: has anyone here, in a similar situation, done something like this? And if your company failed, have you been able to come back to the market in a good situation?

174 comments

[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 207 ms ] thread
Take a year of unpaid sabbatical leave. If the company you work for actually wants to keep you around, they'll give you this opportunity to take a career break to really have a go at something different.

It works for you and for the company. You get to go out there and see what it's like for startups, the challenges, etc. And then apply those lessons internally.

I know lots of people in their 40's and 50's who have done this, with exactly the same golden handcuffs you're talking about. Some of them came back, and rewarded the company's trust with a revitialised vigour. Others decided to leave and pursue their chosen option.

Example: A guy I know was a senior Account Manager at a major telco in Australia. He decided to start a scuba diving business in Thailand. He took 6 months to 'test the waters' (sorry, that was a terrible pun) and decided that was his dream.

Life is short. Live it to the full.

Most company can’t leave a position open for 1 year. If they can , then they probably don’t need this person anymore.
I've seen the sabbatical option working out for some people, but in my case it won't because a number of reasons, including the fact I haven't been there long enough.
I'd say that, especially in a large corporation, if you're a company veteran, with X years of knowledge of the internals, systems, business cases, managers etc., then you're really worth a lot more than a random guy from the street, even he matches your CV in terms of generic experience. A smart company would be more than happy to take you back after your sabbatical.

In other words, in large organizations, organizational complexity can be the main challenge, while tech challenges are really secondary. I see that in a large bank every day.

I spent two years on a self funded hardware startup. It failed and I spent all but 10k of my money (including retirement) by the time I paid off debt that would have trashed my credit for years. (Thanks partner) It was hard and painful and I’m not sure I’d do it again. Certainly not that way. There is something to be said for capital preservation.

On the other hand.. my absolute worst case was losing all my money and getting another six figure job... which I did.

(36, two young kids)

Second worst case would be doing that then... not getting a job. This is always a possibility, the old adage of markets staying irrational longer than you can stay solvent is very true.
Don't... Most jobs suck. There's no way around it. Most jobs have aspects that you just don't want to do. That's why you get paid rather than you pay. You need to figure out how to make your current job fit your needs, financial and psychological.

One thing you can do is to decide how much it takes for you to retire in a more affordable part of the country and work until you reach it at the fastest rate.

Starting a successful business is harder than what you imagine and you'll be surprised how quickly it sucks up your money. Don't put your self in a situation where you have to find whatever job comes along because you are desperate for money.

(deleting)
Thank you for the response. Remote work not an option even though it's FANG (trust me I tried), college fund already established and enough money in it, not mentioned in post.
(comment deleted)
Many high paying jobs suck, but there are salary jobs positioned variously on the satisfaction-pay spectrum. You can apply tech knowledge in other places besides big tech companies and still get paid - eg NGOs, arts/culture, research, small tech consultancy doing a 4 day week with emphasis on life-work balance, etc.

Making a lot of money at miserable jobs and retiring young is a valid alternative strategy, depends on whether there are any satisfying jobs for you. But if you can't imagine one, it may be a sign of burnout...

"Have aspects you dont like" and "can't really stand my job" are two fundamentally different statements. It is not the same.

Majority if tech jobs are not "high stress" either. They are "somewhat stress" at max.

I think there is a huge difference if you do things that suck for the success for your own company (plus outsource that more and more) than doing the same for a company you at best have some options for shares.
Started a mushroom growing business myself, self funded, ran out of money in 6 months. It was hard to get back to work, but I don't regret it. If I would have conserved capital better it would have had a chance.

There are two groups of people when it comes to business those who are sure to fail and those likely to succeed. I was no doubt in the former category at the time.

I left my full time job about 3 years ago and havent looked back since. Glad you have some money put aside. Hold onto enough to get your family through if times get tough, but do ehat you love. Life is way too short to waste on anything. And money means very little compared to anything else in life.
I’ve been in this exact same situation. My best advise would be to start your business aside while maintaining your current job. Do not quit until you have some sort of version #1 of your product or whatever that is. You need data before making your desicion. I planned everything in my head but my steps were way too vague. I will build this kind of products or I’m even gonna try that business that has nothing to do with tech since I have these extra skills. That’s BS. In reality the only smooth transision from a guaranteed paycheck to your own net profite is huge. I lost too much time “trying out things” rather that executing tasks that were already planned ahead of time for a specific business. A business I knew from a fact that would generate an income right away based on feedback or prior experiences. In other words, time was the only missing variable in achieving those steps. In which case it would make total sense to quit your fulltime job to complete your tasks. Again, I didn’t have the data prior to leaving my job so I was running off of guesses and hope.

Back to reality after running out of savings and after freaking out, I took a huge slap in the face interviewing for 30 companies... trying to get the same job I hated before, having to go through all the painful and stressful interviews while seing my bank account getting closer to $0. At the end of the day I took a huge pay cut, I’m no longer working for a top tech company and I feel like I took 5 steps backwards in my 9-5 career. There are hundreds of young candidates out there who have the same skills, same background etc. And they all want your job. I don’t have any savings and I’m back at a crapy job at an average tech company. That sucks, but at least I still know I will ot retire from a 9-5 job in 20 years from now. I will try over and over until I’m able to generate a sufficent income from my own business. I had to go through this experience in order for me to learn something. Today I know exactly what to do next. Just need to recover from that free fall.

At many companies, including all FANG-like companies, you can't start a business on the side. Your employer may claim ownership and you can be fired for breaking your employment contract.
In California, that's not the case. As long as it's not a competitor or in a similar space the company should have no claim to your business or ideas generated while not using the companies resources.
I made the assumption that the new startup would be in tech, in which case it almost certainly overlaps with his FANG employer.
The problem is that 'similar space' is too easily misconstrued. What exactly is the 'space' that Google or Amazon operates in?
I asked a California business attorney this question. She said that you really don't have that much protection. If your idea/company is valuable enough, your huge tech company employer will just sue you into oblivion. The legal costs alone will bury you. The specific California statute that protects what you do with your own time and resources doesn't protect you very much.
It's some protection, and there are niches that none of those tech companies have touched yet. I don't see why people don't see them. If it's a thought that should normally occur in your work day because it could related to your job description or company's products that you could reasonably have an impact on then you're not protected. If it's completely out of left field relative to the previous items then there's no way they could lay claim to it. How could they? Tech is much broader that a lot of people generally think about. Let's say you're doing front end work and your company is some social network but at night you have a brilliant idea for automating biological sample isolation using some robotic system you conjured up during a cup of hot cocoa on the weekend? How is the company going to even attempt to sue you for it when you used none of their resources, the idea was worked on during non-standard hours, and it has nothing to do with them?

If by tech you mean "along the same lines of what I'm doing at work" then you're gonna have a rough time. I do hope that your mind has the ability to wander a bit further from the train of thought you have you typically have while doing what you're paid for.

This goes for the other two replies above as well. If you have an original idea then you're safe. The hard part is having an original idea or even an idea that is several steps removed from a previous idea but still useful.

If you’re working at a FANG company, everything you could possibly do is “in a similar space.” They will lay claim to everything you do while simultaneously employed there.
My best advise would be to start your business aside while maintaining your current job.

If the OP is struggling with the stress of his current role I fail to see how adding additional work is going to help.

I would give just the opposite advice - a man with one behind can't dance a two weddings. He has the savings, go for it. If he fails, go out and get another job.

Either decide to go all out or don't do it all. The stress of trying to juggle a full time job and a starting a business and being there for your family isn't worth it.

My point was for him to at least light up something first not to fully run a business on the side. Of course it's hard to maintain a 9-5 job and to run a business at the same time. Do you know Tarzan? It's exactly the same thing, make sure you're getting a grip on another liana when you make a move otherwise it'll hurt.
Quit tomorrow. You’re smart enough and capable to make a salary most people could only dream about. You’ll be fine. Most people retire on two years worth of your salary.
Well, most Americans anyway appear to retire on about one-fifth of two years' worth of his pre-tax salary. [0]

[0] http://www.transamericacenter.org/docs/default-source/resour...

Unfortunately (or fortunately depending on the perspective), I'm still relatively young and will likely have to pay years of living costs. The average retiree is much older - which is an advantage in this case.
Avoid drastic moves. The older I get the more I realize most “drastic move” stories are bs PR pieces. Think how you can move in the direction you want to go in steps. Move to a cheaper location: see if you can move to a satellite office or work remote. No, then look at other jobs you could interview at in the area you want to move to. Translate your FANG experience into a career jump. Then you will have experience and connections in the area, so if your business flounders you have options to fall back on and aren’t starting cold. Starting your business: find a job with better work life balance and lay the foundation for the jump in your spare time. Focus on the some money path vs. the a lot of money path. See if there are people in the area you move to who can help. Take steps and avoid jumps. But it sounds like you should start moving in this direction now so you don’t get so fed up at work that you make the move in a reactionary fashion. Good luck and godspeed!
(comment deleted)
I agree that drastic moves are not always wise. OP said they had 1.1M in the bank. If that money was invested in dividend stocks, they could have over 38K of passive income a year. In the US, dividend income is only taxed at 15%, too. They could opt to withdraw the 600K from the 401K, use that to buy a condo in cash, and live off the dividend income. Retire now, basically, and live a fairly comfortable life.

It's not princely living, but if I had that option, I would seriously consider it. Having the freedom to do whatever you want with your own time, without the pressure of a job, sounds amazing. I think if I were in that position, I would end up doing something monetizable anyway, through hobby programming projects, but it would be so great to have the freedom to do it at whatever pace I want, and to get to pick what I work on.

If retiring on 1.1M cash + 600K 401K doesn't seem like enough, then sucking it up and staying at the 500K/year job for 2-5 years more is also an option. Cut down on champagne a bit, delay the yearly car upgrade, and you should easily be able to put away 100K a year.

> If that money was invested in dividend stocks, they could have over 38K of passive income a year. In the US, dividend income is only taxed at 15%, too. They could opt to withdraw the 600K from the 401K, use that to buy a condo in cash, and live off the dividend income. Retire now, basically, and live a fairly comfortable life.

Yep, I agree. This is my first thought as well. I don't think it necessarily needs dividend stocks either, general stocks should do the trick. My back-of-the-envelope is:

  * expected return on investment from US stocks at current valuation [+]: ~6%
  * expected inflation rate: ~2%
  * expected real return: ~4%
  * assumed tax rate: 15%
  * annual investment return: (1100000 * 0.04) * (1 - 0.15) = USD $37.4k / year after tax
Assuming you don't have a large family with many dependants or unusually high expenses (medical care, etc) it certainly sounds doable, but perhaps with a dramatic decrease in annual spend for non-essentials (overseas holidays, living in an expensive part of the country, etc).

[+] Compared to historical prices, US stocks are currently very highly priced, hence expected real returns (~4%) are lower than historical average real returns (~7%). See e.g. http://www.philosophicaleconomics.com/2018/01/future-u-s-equ...

The 4% rule is a good one as it's (as you mention) much more likely. Also, if your withdrawal rate is 4%, the likelihood of you seeing that income until you die is much, much higher.

As stated elsewhere, getting yourself down to spending 37k a year is going to be the hardest part, no matter where you live.

The problem I see, time and time again as a bystander to the financial industry is that people simple aren't saving enough, or what they have saved is overspent at a rate that's unsustainable. If one needs to live off of 24k/80k/200k a year in retirement; then their investments should reflect that.

15% is for long-term capital gains. Dividend income is taxed at a much higher rate.
> If retiring on 1.1M cash + 600K 401K doesn't seem like enough, then sucking it up and staying at the 500K/year job for 2-5 years more is also an option. Cut down on champagne a bit, delay the yearly car upgrade, and you should easily be able to put away 100K a year.

Definitely. Decide how much a modest retirement is, and then hit that goal. If non-city dwelling is something you like, you can live far away from the city very cheaply.

On top of that, I'd try to find ways to cheapen your life now. 500k/y is a lot, and while everything's relative, you could lower your standard of living and put away a ton of money in just a year or two, getting your goals faster.

If you retired with a family and have 38k and got $28.5k after tax. Do you know how much health insurance costs for a family? Property tax on a property that's $600k is not going to be cheap either. Add utilities, property maintenance. You are going to be looking for another job fast or dipping into your savings.
(comment deleted)
In the right states (ie, those who took ACA subsidies from the federal gov), your premiums are based on your income. Low income = low health insurance premiums.

Agreed that a 600k condo is a poor choice; move to a college town where you can get a single family home for $150k-200k and the property taxes are only ~$2-3k/year. Avoid an HOA.

You can retire at any time if your investment income can support your expenses. Think about those expenses carefully. It is entirely possible for a family of four to live off of ~$30k/year if you receive ACA subsidies, your house is paid off (no housing expense), and you have no outlier expenses.

withdraw the 600K from the 401K, use that to buy a condo in cash

OP wants to move to a lower COL area. Around here $600k, even if you take the tax + penalty hit for an early withdrawal, buys plenty of house. We're talking 5,000 sq ft on 3-5 acres about 15 minutes outside town if rural living floats your boat.

I'd do it in a heartbeat!

Excellent advice. Esp thinking ab how u can minimize risk as much as possible!
$500k per year?! You would be insane to walk away from that. Keep it up for a decade, save as much as you can, and retire in your 50s.
$500k a year Cali translate to $100k a year where I live. Cost of living in Cali is crazy expensive.
Cost of living in Cali is crazy expensive, though your example is a bit exaggerated. $250k if it's medium-ish midwest town maybe.
There is a website that calculates this kind of stuff.

https://www.bestplaces.net/cost-of-living/charlotte-nc/palo-...

*Edited: Should also say I fully understand that if your duckduckgo skills are hardcore mode you can find a website to support anything you say.

Sure if you cherry pick like literally the most expensive 25sq mile neighborhood, and are dead set on buying real estate and not renting.

But even then, the calculation on bestplaces.net appears to be a bit farcical:

Assuming you spend $8k/month on renting a large modern 2500+ sqft house, and are in the tax bracket which knocks your after-tax income to $300k from $500k, you still have ~$200k after tax and housing. The rest of your expenses are not going to be so much more expensive (~4x) that they don't vastly exceed $100k - tax (~25k) - housing (24k for similar) in NC.

$250k in NC vs $500k in bay area though sure, that's in the right realm.

Also, you're in a tax bracket where you're basically a golden egg-laying goose for the government.
I have lived in California and I can't think of many places in the continental US where $500k CA translates to $100k locally. And I've lived in several cities in the east coast, west coast and the Southeast
The title question is about courage, and I think that's what you're after. So I would say, yes, I do have the courage to abandon my high-paying job.

Your description of what you'd like to do sounds like an adventure, and if you're looking for someone here to tell you, "Yes, I started my own business --- it was awesome, and now I'm a ba-zillionaire!", well, I can't do that; but I can tell you that I too am chasing my dream like a fucking madman, and you should absolutely go for that thing you love with all your heart.

... the more conservative side of me thinks you'd do well to put in a good show/do some good work for your current employer, before setting off for the high seas. If not enough for the golden handcuffs, at least enough to part on friendly terms.

good luck to you!

Before you do this (quit to start your own company), consider FIRE -- financial independence, retire early. With a 500K salary look at reducing your expenses to bare minimum for the next 2 - 5 years, and see if you can build up your investment portfolio to a couple million -- that would give you 80K a year (using a safe withdrawal rate of 4%) to live off of. (Remember that income from long-term investments is taxed at a lower rate, and no FICA is taken out either). That is more than enough if you move to the middle of the US. Of course, many people do FIRE at much lower, all depends on what you are willing to accept.
(comment deleted)
I was at a FANG peer, making > 900k/yr. I have savings similar to yours, a little bit more perhaps, but also expenses (mortgage, private school x2 kids, 2x car payments). I'm not bragging, just providing context.

I quit my job a month ago to go join a much smaller company and took a 70% pay cut. I'll still make enough to pay the bills, and I have some equity so that if it works out I'll probably break even in 5-6 years. But it probably won't, and if it doesn't I won't be crushed. I am making this decision for a reason (personal development, interest, wanting to learn something new, etc), and if it's a disaster I'll be able to find another job relatively easily I hope. Luckily, I'm not changing cities.

Anyway, you asked if someone had done something similar, so wanted to jump in and mention it.

I think you responded to the post rather than a comment. Not sure what is the parent of this comment
My experience..the older you get, the more willing you are to give up income for freedom.

Happy to trade my nice house and cars to get a lower monthly cost basis. That then allows me to take a lower stress, lower hours, but lower salary job.

I guess it's as simple as ageing makes your non-work time seem more valuable.

"Very few sit on their deathbed wishing they spent more time at work"

I would call it : prepare for retirement.

Reduce cost. ( Change house / Appartement)

Reduce working hours ( don't need to be drastic)

Get a hobby! ( Make sure it is one with social interactions)

Look for a position you like. With even less working hours. For example 40.

Prepare for retirement with a nice hobby. New friends and stress free environment.

In 2009 I left my well-paying job at Google to start a startup. I wasn't terribly unhappy at Google - I just didn't want to spend my whole life there, so it seemed like a good time to do something else. Over the next year and a half or so, that startup fizzled.

Psychologically that point of failure felt pretty bad. But it seemed pretty clear that I would be able to come back on the job market in a fine situation. Employers seemed to consider a year working on a startup as either a neutral or a positive item on my resume. And I had certainly learned a lot more about many different things than I would have in a few more years at Google.

Anyway, I felt like I had more fun working at the startup, and since my fizzled startup was actually able to pay me a bit I still had decent savings, so I did another startup. Investors thought the experience at the previous failed startup was a positive, and the experience from the first failed one really seemed like it was helpful to me too.

For you, if you have a high paying job at a FANG company and had prestigious positions in other companies then you are a pretty competent person. You are going to be able to find a job that pays you well enough to live a good lifestyle, even if you take some time on a failed venture, and even if you move to a different part of the country. You don't need to be afraid of a negative outcome.

You only have one life to live. Are you going to spend the rest of it in a well-paying job that you hate? Knowing that it might have worked out better if you had been willing to take a little risk?

TLDR Do it!

Wrong advice. First live the life before doing it. Going to move somewhere? Rent first. Going to live a life with a lower living standard? Start living on a budget first. So when you are forced to do this, you and your family will be able to accept and adapt properly.
Good news on the living standard - I grew up in relative poverty, so that won't be as much of a problem. I still don't spend a lot these days...
Oh, I get you now. I grew up super poor and the thought of falling back into it keeps me up at night to this day.

That's what's making this decision hard.

>>I grew up in relative poverty

Not sure what you are trying to say here. Do you want to go back to those days?

I'm okay with that, yes.
I agree with the buying/renting thing (I don't see a reason to buy except as investment anyway)

However it is very easy to simply start from a lower standard and increase as you feel you need to than to start at the top and decrease to a lower standard gradually.

Overly cautious approach. The guy has a very nice cushion as it is. He doesn't need to live off a budget before switching to a startup. And obv he would rent something in a new place before straight up buying a place in a town he's not familiar with.
The problem you face is pretty simple, your opportunity costs are just too high:

The probability that you create a company as a first-time founder that generates $500k/yr or $42k/month is...

- in 12 months ultra low

- in 24 months super low

- in 36 months low

And being a founder lacking success over a period of many months or years might be much worse than what you experience now. You would learn a lot though. But I doubt that your mental health would be better.

> My question is: has anyone here, in a similar situation, done something like this? And if your company failed, have you been able to come back to the market in a good situation?

Not first hand but I know two folks who were in senior positions in a high paying job (one product head and one VP of marketing) who quit their high paying jobs to start their own companies. One of them failed and the person is now the CEO of another well funded company. The other one is doing fine and got an investment from a good investor.

My personal opinion is that if you are able to get a gig that pays 500k at one of the FANG companies you should have no problem getting a job back if your company fails.

I am considering it right now for exactly the same reason. I'm almost your age, but I don't have a family. I don't have anywhere near your savings but I've done this once before with almost nothing, and I didn't have any problem coming back to the job market after my multi-year "hiatus" when I ran my own company. I even took a multi-month "sabbatical" before returning to the job market to travel and party and be a slob and pursue my own interests (with basically no money), so there's a big hole in my work history. But nobody seemed to care except for a couple of companies which I wouldn't have enjoyed working at anyway. But I'll tell you the one thing: yolo.
I live in a small town in New Mexico. My ~1200 sq. ft. house cost $95k. My wife and I lived comfortably here, the two of us, on essentially $70k/year for the first four years of our marriage. Since then, the money has gone up, we have two kids and raising two kids here has been fairly inexpensive too.

Across most of the country, you could take an 80% pay cut and still be considered rich by 90% of the people around you.

Life is different out here but I think you have enough money, and you know it, and it isn't making you happy or you wouldn't be contemplating your move. So fuck it, what have you got to lose? You'll probably find that the abundance of time and massive reduction in stress is adequate compensation.

Since a game typically doesn't have a first mover advantage nor suffer from a "time is of the essence" problem, and given your opportunity cost of income, you should consider outsourcing the development of your game to a cheaper labor market. With your technical know how, you can supervise your team to your liking, launch the game, and see how it goes. While you still might be unhappy at work, this will preserve more of your savings than quitting, and give you a more viable option to quit in the future.
Not sure why you are getting downvoted, as this is the best solution that I have seen so far. Even in the Bay Area, 500k salary is an outlier, and the op can easily afford to hire a part time local developer or full time in a lower cost of living area.

Another similar option would be to look for a co-founder, and 'self-finance' the company initially. I am sure there are some folks out there who would happily take a lower % of equity in exchange for a small salary. And the added advantage is you essentially have unlimited runway.

Translation gradually if you can! See if you can work a day less, maybe via contracting at your current firm, or for different ones. Make sure that you have at least 1 real workday to crank out a MVP (and if you can, add evenings and/or weekends sometimes). As soon as you have real customer/investor interest, you can dial down your contracting as you dial up your business. This is not without risk but it’s way less risky than a Big Bang approach, and this worked well for me personally (founded Transloadit exactly like this which I’ve been doing 5 years fulltime now, with 4 years of gradually ramping up engagement while contracting for my old employer and a few others). I do realize all situations are different and I was rather lucky/privileged to be able to pull it off like this. But given your position & savings you are in a better spot than I was. But maybe also more to lose, so I won’t pretend it will be easier for you!
/Translation/Transition/

sorry for the typos I was on mobile, a dutch keyboard, and in a hurry :)

You can absolutely return to the job market and get a good job again after failing at a startup. This happens all the time. You are still just as qualified after failing as before – probably more so – and employers know this. I say this both as someone who has done this myself (and seen friends/colleagues do it), and as a hiring manager who is more than happy to talk to candidates like this.

Relocating outside the Bay Area will make it harder to find that job. But there are lots of remote opportunities today, and in the worst case you might be able to relo back here.

Life is short. If you are excited about this prospect, and you can afford to spend the money if it doesn't work out, then go for it.

I doubt you'll find a consensus on this question. My opinion, for what it's worth, is that this also follows the dictum of "asking if you should fire someone means you've already made your decision", and prevaricating only prolongs the pain.

I made a similar decision with much less of a financial cushion (and without moving away from the west coast) and it worked out OK. I'm happy now and don't regret giving up the millions. YMMV, of course. One tip: make it your goal to get to ramen profitability ASAP, not in 2-3 years -- it has a wonderful way of focusing your work.

Good luck whatever you choose, and keep in mind that either decision will remain reversible for at least a few years. If you go out on your own, I don't think having "I tried to run my own startup, failed, and learned a lot" will be a negative when seeking another tech job, and you can always move back.

Move to Western Europe, enjoy the 7 weeks of vacation ?
There are no engineering jobs in Europe that would pay anything close to the poster's current $500k/year salary. He'd be looking at a 80-90% pay cut.
If you are panicking do not do it. It’s really that simple. Work with a therapist to understand first why you are incapable of being comfortable with your life choices. Let me just say when I made the choice to accept a lower living standard I had first spent several months living that life first, so when it was forced on me there was no difficulty adapting.