This could be a very convenient tool! Is it an open source project? If it is, I can imagine using this to quickly create landing sites or web sites for code projects. No worries if not.
That it's a lot harder to correctly type HTML than it is to express a basic page layout in this new form. In other words, on this view HTML is not source code, it's object code, and should be produced by a program, not by humans. I would agree with that.
That's indeed a valid question. I think it's quite a bit simpler than HTML, albeit not by a huge factor. I think that that makes a difference, as the relative success of Markdown shows. But I agree I might be wrong, we'll see.
It is telling that the generated HTML for the example document ends up being almost 2x the size of the input, in terms of markup overhead the generated HTML is almost 3x worse than this TextMock (by a very crude estimate).
Very cool, thanks for the link! I've also seen extensions of Markdown (CommonMark generic directives) that I could use instead of the syntax I made up.
For possibly the first time ever, I really liked this one, and it makes great sense why it happens. It showed a clear demo in seconds, and then automatically closed itself to reveal the UI it was just showing.
The demo is so robust I probably wouldn't have figured out the tool's purpose in 10 seconds without the video.
I completely agree, I'm thinking about that. I should probably specify the grammar and make my tm->html converter open source. And probably allow to store on a personal git repo so that nobody is afraid to be locked in. So many interesting things to do, and so little time :)
Nice to see someone else working on tools like this. I think Markdown has a good level of ‘accessibility’ in that the syntax is friendly while fairly capable.
If you’re curious, here’s some of my experiments (best viewed on desktop):
hard to tell exactly what you’re doing from mobile but looos interesting and i’ll look more later - here’s mine let’s collaborate http://www.hyperfiddle.net
I'm glad someone's experimenting with this idea. The makers of CakeMail did something similar with email templates a while back (see http://cakedown.alexandredeschamps.ca/), and I always thought it was a bummer that they didn't keep going with the idea.
This is great! I'm not sure if I'm missing it somewhere, but it would be nice to be able to see the resulting HTML without having to view the page source.
29 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 68.8 ms ] threadI saw that as a useful to quickly prototype an idea. But I'm not yet sure frankly.
https://choosealicense.com/licenses/isc/
That it's a lot harder to correctly type HTML than it is to express a basic page layout in this new form. In other words, on this view HTML is not source code, it's object code, and should be produced by a program, not by humans. I would agree with that.
The demo is so robust I probably wouldn't have figured out the tool's purpose in 10 seconds without the video.
If the format is only easily usable/previewable on some proprietary site that might go away, people will be reluctant to learn/adopt the format.
If you’re curious, here’s some of my experiments (best viewed on desktop):
- https://datadown.collected.design/github/RoyalIcing/lofi-boo... - https://lofi.design/syntax/ - http://collected.design/research
Keen to collaborate with people!
It's a downloadable client and for on Windows, Linux & OS X