14 comments

[ 4.6 ms ] story [ 42.4 ms ] thread
(comment deleted)
Interesting how the New York Times is following the Taboola-like structure of clickbaity headlines. Maybe it's where the money is after all.
I'd love to read this page, but my subconscious won't allow me to follow a link with that title.
Like all articles about space, the headlines was 1000 x more exciting than the contents.
"The model astronomers had about where things should be had to be updated"
Wasn't this on HN a few days ago?
I've often wondered: is it possible for a grouping of asteroids to have a highly elliptical orbit and pass Earth's distance to the sun very infrequently, say every X million years?

Is it possible that there is some very regular chance that the Earth would get pummelled, but only on extremely long time spans? How would we know or not know?

Isn't that pretty much the orbit of a comet?
I think many that we know about have orbits in the thousands of years or less, with some known in the millions. But would it be possible for a huge grouping or sequence of them to maintain such an orbit together?
Meteorite showers are pretty much that, aren't they?