If money is your sole motivator, I don't think you'll get very far, at least in the startup world.
You should do what you love. Make peoples' lives easier. Financial gain is just a by-product.
Go out and change the world, with a passion to change the world (rather than financial gain), and the rewards (whatever they may be, money or otherwise) will come.
Did I miss how Python fits in here? Seems to be a rather large cognitive gap between the premise and the supporting argument.
The commentary about the "true entrepreneur" has some interesting insights, although it seems a bit religious. We are all organic variable individuals, not Platonic types.
It wasn't there for linkbait purposes, it was there because the startup my friend was considering which initiated this post is crazy about python, another startup in progress is all python-based, and python is always coming up in the discussion. If I wanted to linkbait I would have used a more popular language like Java.
12 comments
[ 13.7 ms ] story [ 500 ms ] threadA steady job just can't give you that. And to top it all off, it can't give you the possibility of a big reward either. lose-lose
edit: that is to say, a big reward that somebody gives you, isn't a reward at all, you're supposed to go get it yourself
It's not work, it's a hobby that (sometimes) pays. It's exactly the same as playing WoW, only more socially acceptable.
So when there isn't money in the bank you go out and you MAKE SOME DAMN MONEY.
If all else fails get an out-of-focus purely-for-money project. There's usually a lot of those lying about if you're willing to work on them.
full disclosure: my startup has yet to pay bills, but we have a knack for getting government grants
You should do what you love. Make peoples' lives easier. Financial gain is just a by-product.
Go out and change the world, with a passion to change the world (rather than financial gain), and the rewards (whatever they may be, money or otherwise) will come.
The commentary about the "true entrepreneur" has some interesting insights, although it seems a bit religious. We are all organic variable individuals, not Platonic types.