8 comments

[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 32.4 ms ] thread
I feel like everyone's attacking a straw man version of Jordan Peterson in a case of mass virtue signaling.
Yep. If this guy had anything legit to pin on JP, this long-ass drawn-out story would have been much shorter.
He does.

1. He's more of a preacher than a teacher, even in the classroom.

2. He uses the language of fear, a lot.

3. His follower tend to be outright dismissive of opposing views.

Ps. I'm also a fan. He helped me clean my room.
Those points describe a large number of public intellectuals from across the political spectrum, most of whom I would not consider dangerous.
Having one's followers be dismissive of opposing views is not necessarily bad. Darwin shares that distinction.
You've just described almost every humanities professor I've ever had. I didn't need an article that long to hear a pot call a kettle black.
I really can't stand JP, I'm glad to see more people coming with articles opposing him. I feel like in a lot of cases in interviews he rambles off and touches on so many different points that people have a hard time responding to him. I think the author of this article tries to touch on this somewhat.