Ask HN: Paid PhD or Silicon Valley?

15 years is a long time. You're giving up a large amount of freedom right there. The DoE will still be there in 12 months if SV doesn't work out. I'd do it that way round.

try something cool, start your own

Don't sign up for 15 year commitment with anyone! Who knows if the DoE will be doing work that interests you in 2035. If you don't like the work, you won't be able to leave.

You should be able to make enough between tuition waivers, being a teaching assistant, and summer internships to live cheaply through grad school. Then when you're done you'll be free, with your new PhD, to pick the awesomest job you can find.

Doing PhD in midwest is like living in jail.

15 year commitment? No thanks. I think the PhD route is better than the SV route in the long term, but you need to find a PhD route with fewer strings attached. You say you're in the Midwest, you shouldn't need anywhere near $90K/yr to cover basic living expenses. If you can't make that happen then look for the job most interesting to you - regardless of where it's located. If you're willing to relocate then you're willing to relocate anywhere. Enjoy it while you're still young!

If I were you, signing a service commitment with the Department of Energy for ~15 years after the PhD is completed is a deal breaker.

15 years! that's a big portion of life.

Also, it really depends on what will be the area of focus of the PhD program, for which we have no information.

May I know how you got job in SV self driving cars startup. I am trying but not getting job.

What many inside the SV bubble may forget is how miserable day-to-day life can be in SV, as compared to flyover country.

How's $3600 a month in rent grab you? $500k for a down payment on a teardown? An added 30 minutes of commute time on a dingy BART train or averaging 6mph on the 101? Homeless camps and stale urine smells next to multi-millionnaire's homes and offices?

Finding, making, and keeping friends in the valley is double-difficult, because everyone's under such pressure to work extra hours, and the area isn't exactly renowned for its people skills.

If you're looking to settle down and raise a family, you might find the odds are pretty good in SV, though (in terms of single people in that age range that are family-minded and also worth marrying). At least until your kids need daycare.

As someone who's dipped a toe in both, I'd actually recommend giving further thought to the DOE deal. You might even be more fundable (and hirable!) after 15 years' DOE experience, moving to SV, than after 15 years' startup experience in SV.

As some of the commentators mentioned, 15 years is a long time.

When I was 18, I wanted to be a fighter pilot more than anything in the world. The 11 year commitment to do so seemed like a no brainer.

I went to college, got commissioned and made my way through flight school. I spent 8 of those 11 years in the cockpit doing pretty awesome things. But I was ready to leave and try something else around year 8. My civilian peers were trying out a whole bunch of cool work with the freedom to move at will.

Now that I'm 35, I don't regret my decision, but I realize how much time 11 years really is. I did something I loved, and reflect fondly upon, but am thrilled to be doing something else.

A lot will change between 25 and 40. You have a very small window to get in earlyish on an emerging tech. If it fails, the government will still be around - and with experience in the Valley, an immense number of opportunities around the country will be at your beck and call.

I agree many of my mates would kill for a $90k fellowship, 15 years is too long to commit to anything though.

I assume your PhD would be scientific or technical? If so, doing a regular PhD you would be paid tuition plus $25-45k/year (with research/TA/etc). With this in mind, assuming a five-year PhD:

1. Choosing the first option, you are essentially being paid $225-325K extra during the PhD, in exchange for a 15-year commitment to the DOE. Certainly, you would easily be able to make up this amount doing a regular PhD then going into industry for 15 years (with a higher salary than government can pay).

2. Choosing the second option, you are deciding to give up ~$1M in exchange for a PhD. It is unlikely the PhD (versus 5 years experience) will grant you much higher of a salary as an engineer, unless you are an extraordinary researcher or you hope to become a research director or executive with it.

Keep in mind that a PhD is ultimately training for becoming a researcher. So, I would recommend a PhD only if you really enjoy the field, most importantly enjoy doing research, and are okay with a lower salary for the duration. Also consider what ultimate job you want to have and if a PhD can better help you attain it. After all, it seems you already have a desirable skillset.

Both imply working for someone. The PhD seems better.

Wow, that's a crazy commitment. What happens if you break it?