Poll: Open up or be closed about business data?
Hello HN,
I was planning on following patio11's example of opening up the books on ww.com, what it's like to run a membership site from the inside, how much it costs to run a site like that, to serve as a living example of what to do (and not to do!) but I'm having a hard time weighing the pros and the cons.
Competition in the field where I'm active is absolutely murderous, there must be a few hundred sites active in this segment.
What would you do, and more importantly, why?
(see also: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1717556)
12 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 41.6 ms ] threadIf you don't wanna do that. I would like to see you white-label your service to others with an eye for eye-candy, and you stick to the engineering side of things, delivering kickass, high-quality multimedia in realtime.
Seriously. White-label that fucker and give people APIs and widgets. You will get everyone from porn to security industry to Zoos to e-learning to conferencing.
Cheers! :-)
It's like 'github' for businesses, I hope not to lose anything but help others to gain.
I may in fact gain in terms of feedback and ideas.
http://www.balsamiq.com/blog
Being public about your success matters to customers. Business numbers are social proof as well as demonstrating you are reliable because you won't be going out of business soon.
If your competitors are an active threat who are likely to raise money, don't divulge real numbers because you make it easy for them to prove the business model to others without having to invest their own capital and time learning that information themselves.
Finally, being too transparent actually can confuse and annoy customers. Most customers don't understand economics, so if they see you are making 90% operational margin they'll think you're charging too much because they can't account for marketing and capital investments like R&D.
(Former public navel gazer. Mostly personal stuff, though.)
Good luck.