Not searchable by name. There's a description like "video game developer says he won't take down had reviews but does" but you'd presumably have to watch the linked-to video to find out who.
I guess this is for legal reasons. "Hey, we didn't mention anyone". Means that the page needs to be monitored for dead links when the videos/articles get taken down.
They could link to the censored object in question in the articles. For example, in this [1] report they mention that the tweet was reinstated, but they never link to it. After some searching, I eventually found it here [2]
My channel was given a notice from Nintendo and I appealed it agreeing to go to court. They disputed and re-filed the claim multiple times and said I lost the claim after appeal.
The video was of me downloading via Github a NES emulator that someone wrote in less than 1000 lines of C++ not even minified or anything. It worked too and had many features. I made the video to show the developer a bug with the sound. None of the sound even played correctly which was the entire premise of the video itself. You could barely make out the tune of the original Zelda game even if you knew it, let alone enjoy it with all the random static, pops and clicks.
I was actually excited to make a series of videos showing me doing emulation from the ground up so that more could enjoy the hobby and teach people how emulators aren't always complicated black boxes of magic, but upon losing the appeal over the course of 2 months on my FIRST upload I gave up since it would have taken me hours to manage this for every video when I wasn't expecting to make anything from it.
Also Nintendo attempts to essentially bribe you saying they will make it all go away is you give them 60% ownership and sign their partner agreement. I declined, and they later said I violated the partner agreement I never accepted in the YouTube dispute.
No. I had to sign an affidavit as part of the appeal after Nintendo appealed saying I was willing to go to court and that YouTube was going to end their involvement in the dispute if it continued then the next email I received was saying I had lost my dispute and I could start the process over again for a third time. At that point I started considering the reality of doing this with every video and decided to cut my losses since it would never scale.
YouTube's content takedown/appeal process is both Kafkaesque and completely rigged in favor of large businesses. Even/especially when they claim content that they don't own.
I just purchased a New 2DSXL (for Rhythm Core Alpha 2). I had to return it twice because the first two units I received were dead on arrival. Power lights but no sound and no screens.
Those look like their both from the same test card pattern, but not the same image of that test card. The paper grain/noise looks different between the two.
21 comments
[ 0.22 ms ] story [ 56.7 ms ] threadMight have this as a regular submission, for extra amplification.
Long story short, a YouTube channel got five copyright notices on a 10 hour video featuring nothing but white noise.
It was also the story that kind of influenced EFF to re-introduce Takedown Hall of Shame: https://twitter.com/EFF/status/971541783380242433
And, finally, a link to the tweet that started this whole story by the uploader of the video: https://twitter.com/littlescale/status/949032404206870528
I guess this is for legal reasons. "Hey, we didn't mention anyone". Means that the page needs to be monitored for dead links when the videos/articles get taken down.
Perhaps the listing of it here can help it get back up. ..
[1] https://www.eff.org/takedowns/critic-uses-dmca-avoid-critici...
[2] https://twitter.com/PhoxelHQ/status/991790495088173056
The video was of me downloading via Github a NES emulator that someone wrote in less than 1000 lines of C++ not even minified or anything. It worked too and had many features. I made the video to show the developer a bug with the sound. None of the sound even played correctly which was the entire premise of the video itself. You could barely make out the tune of the original Zelda game even if you knew it, let alone enjoy it with all the random static, pops and clicks.
I was actually excited to make a series of videos showing me doing emulation from the ground up so that more could enjoy the hobby and teach people how emulators aren't always complicated black boxes of magic, but upon losing the appeal over the course of 2 months on my FIRST upload I gave up since it would have taken me hours to manage this for every video when I wasn't expecting to make anything from it.
Also Nintendo attempts to essentially bribe you saying they will make it all go away is you give them 60% ownership and sign their partner agreement. I declined, and they later said I violated the partner agreement I never accepted in the YouTube dispute.
Nintendo is trash in my book now.
I just purchased a New 2DSXL (for Rhythm Core Alpha 2). I had to return it twice because the first two units I received were dead on arrival. Power lights but no sound and no screens.
Bethesda 'original': https://www.theworkprint.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/plea...
EFF 'version': https://www.eff.org/files/2017/08/01/no-downtime-1.jpg