Ask HN: Are cryptocurrencies good or bad for America?

2 points by bbimbop ↗ HN

12 comments

[ 145 ms ] story [ 317 ms ] thread
Crypto currencies are agnostic to geography.
While I agree with your basic premise, I think there is some room for debate.

Firstly, regions/geography with cheap power and/or natural cooling are at a clear advantage with respect to payment for proof of work.

Secondly, regions where black markets thrive are at a clear advantage with respect to use and potential liquidity.

(imho)

Their users aren't agnostic to laws, and laws are determined by geography.
If by "America" one is referring to the USA, then I personally think that there are no legitimate benefits.
If startups can raise money with security tokens then accredited investors who aren't connected (i.e. Angels and VC's) can get in on the action. AngelList left everyone hanging and gave syndicate leads all the power.
If you're talking about the US today, it's hard to say for sure. We don't know what people are using them for with much accuracy or precision.

A major use seems to be to commit fraud or as a risky speculation vehicle. We also know they've replaced cash in a tiny portion of the black-market economy.

Like everyone else, I have almost no data, but my guess is that it's net "bad" right now.

As for the future, anyone who says they know for sure is very naive. We just don't know what could happen. Perhaps crypto will save us all from a corrupt government.

There are quite a few local businesses near me that prefer to take cash. They say it's because of the credit card fees. Maybe it's because they don't want records that the IRS can subpoena at some point?

A distributed ledger is hardly anonymous.

Crypto is good for money laundry and fraud. Not good for America.
> Crypto is good for money laundry

What about cash? Is cash good for America?

> and fraud

What kind of fraud?

(comment deleted)
So far money laundering has been done with dollars and cash.